|
Tue, 04/29/2008 - 12:49
The Wall Street Journal - the mouthpiece of Business itself - had some stingingly
harsh criticism of the Fed on its Monday Opinion page. An editorial titled "The
Fed's Bender" begins:
So Federal Reserve officials are whispering to reporters that they will
consider a "pause" after another interest-rate cut this week. Perhaps we
should be more respectful, but this sounds like the alcoholic who tells his
wife he'll quit drinking next weekend, after one more bender. What Chairman
Ben Bernanke needs isn't a gradual withdrawal from easy money but membership
in Central Bankers Anonymous.
The Street wants a rate cut, and it is being pushed heavily in the Media.
Bloomberg tells us: Bernanke
May Have to Follow Volcker to Avoid Being Tagged Burns. Today MarketWatch
has a story which lists the many
compelling reasons for the Fed to halt its interest rate cuts. And the
sooner the better! The story ends thusly: "Finally, a pause could even be taken
as a sign that the worst is over for the economy. Wouldn't that be a nice surprise?" This
calls to mind recent analysis by Dr.
Marc Faber, who has proven himself to be one of the most thoughtful and
level-headed analysts around. In this particular piece, he demonstrates convincingly
that inflation and deflation can and do occur in different markets and in different
parts of the world simultaneously. Over the past 25 years, as a bubble has
inflated in one market, a corresponding deflation has occured elsewhere. His
conclusion:
The point that I cannot stress sufficiently is that when a bubble bursts,
it is a signal that the economics of a region or sector have changed, or
are about to change for a very long time, if not permanently. I am, therefore,
surprised by how complacent and optimistic economists and strategist have
remained in the wake of the total collapse of the CDO market and the widespread
damage caused to financial stocks. Over the last 12 months or so, one sector
of the financial industry after another has been hit, with the latest casualties
being credit card companies such as American Express.
This short paragraph should put tomorrow's Fed announcement into better perspective
than the hours of MSM (mainstream media) speculation on the minutia of whether
the Fed cut a quarter point or not. What Dr. Faber is saying is that whatever
they decide is irrelevant. The late, great American bubble economy was
built on cheap and easy credit, and regardless of what the Fed does tomorrow
- a quarter point or whatever - that era is over.
Inflation has no doubt been bad, thanks to a falling dollar and rising oil
and food prices. But let's take a look at what the market is saying via some
visual inspection of commodity charts. Data is as of midday, Tuesday:
Crude oil, one of the recent inflationary all-stars, is still in an
undeniable uptrend, though it is pulling back a bit today:

Likewise, corn remains near its recent high. The recent ethanol craze
makes corn a quasi-oil subsitute:

And rice, the subject of global panic, looks like it might be
cresting. (On the other hand, it may just be consolidating for a further push
higher.) The important thing to note is that the rise has become parabolic,
and we know what happens to all parabolic rises.

But remember just a few short weeks ago? It was wheat that was the
subject of global panic. As I heard it, a form of wheat rust was threatening the
entire global wheat crop! Friends prone to panic (of which I have many)
were calling me up - how to I buy wheat!? That was right near the second peak
of a possible double top on the wheat chart. Important point: Markets are emotional
and at times irrational.

Soybeans also are well off their highs, and this chart is starting
to get "that look:"

What "look" is that, you ask? That toppy, crashy kind of look. A new high,
a failure to reach the old high, then a collapse, as seen below in sugar. Don't
forget that sugar is also a quasi-oil substitute. Nearly all of Brazil's cars
are powered by ethanol made from sugar. This leads me to believe that oil may
have put its top in, at least temporarily.

What else has got that "look?" Sad to say it to the gold bugs, but gold has
got the look too, and is down nearly $20 today. Am I bearish gold? I have been
short since the last Fed meeting via futures contracts. But I am not bearish
long term on gold - never long term. Gold is money, end of story. Buy the bullion
- physical gold and keep it forever. But if you're trading shares or futures,
beware of excess leverage, as you can be wiped out completely if you're long
and fully leveraged. Read Jim Sinclair's
site for good advice.

We see prices continue to rise in a few areas: oil, rice, corn and copper
(not shown). Dr. Copper is near its high, but appears to be having second thoughts
about it. Elsewhere, we see corrections in beans, wheat, sugar and gold. More
commodities are correcting than are rising. In my opinion, this is the effect
of the global deleveraging that we hear so much about. Commodity speculators
speculate with borrowed money. Borrowed money is getting harder to come by,
so the number of commodities still rising is shrinking.
The global deleveraging is also starting to be reflected in the US Dollar,
the currency in which all the above are priced. Yes, the chart is ugly, but
it may just be starting to turn up. Keep your eye on the buck, which
everyone has given up for dead.

Its pattern mirrors the 10-year Treasury yield. The Fed does not set interest
rates. The market sets rates - the Fed simply follows along. And whatever the
Fed decides tomorrow, the market has already decided that it is time for interest
rates to rise.

A global credit bust means - recession or not - less business activity overall.
Rising interest rates lead to a rising dollar, which in turn leads to lower
prices for anything priced in dollars. This includes US stocks. The SPX has
been unable to break through 1400 on the upside. Currently it is sporting what
appears to be an inverted head and shoulders pattern that projects an upside
target of around 1550. But patterns are not certainties - they merely represent probabilities of
what might happen next. A failed head and shoulders is an excellent contrary
indicator. Keep your eye on the 1400 level on the SPX in the coming days. Sign
up here for updates.

A couple shorts in my portfolio:
The Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG). Do you like spending $7.25 on a rice and
bean burrito? I don't. I don't like overpaying to feel like a peasant. I can
do that for free. This chain is a fad, beans and rice are expensive (even though
they may have seen their highs), people are eating out less, and when they
do, I don't think they want to pay $7.25 for a rice and bean burrito. And at
least in my area, there are several mom & pop burrito places that are both
better and cheaper. And the chart also has "that look."

Whirlpool. Housing bust means Whirlpool should continue down the drain:

One to keep an eye on as an indicator that stocks really are in the tank:
Apple (AAPL). I got a newsletter this week that just put Apple on their buy
list. I read an article by Jim Cramer about how he loves Apple. Everyone loves
Apple. And their products are affordable. Anyone can go to the Apple Store
and buy a new laptop for $1,200, or an iPod for $250. Affordable? Yeah, just
put it on your credit card and the payments work out to about $25 - $30 per
month. Easy. But what if you don't have a card, or any more room on your card?
Then Apple's shiny products cross into the realm of "I wish I could afford
one of those."
How long will it take the average worker, making $12 per hour, to save up
for Apple's cool gadgets, after paying his rent, gas, food, other living expenses
- and don't forget, taxes? The time is not yet right to short AAPL, but keep
your eye on it. As one of the leading stocks of the past decade, this stock's
direction should act as a leading indicator for the economy. Apple is not yet
ripe as a short. Sign
up here to stay updated on when (or if) to short AAPL.

If the credit bubble has indeed burst, and Dr. Faber is correct that the economics
are now changed for good, we are in for a massive deflation that will be reflected
across all sectors of the economy for a long time.
The Fed will announce its interest rate decision tomorrow at 2:15PM ET. The
WSJ article that I quoted above states:
The Fed's problem has been both political and intellectual. Politically,
Mr. Bernanke has been unwilling to say no to Wall Street and the Beltway
political class, which reflexively demand easier money in a crisis. This
demand has become almost Pavlovian since Wall Street came to believe during
the late 1990s in what was known, fairly or not, as the "Greenspan put." It
takes character to resist this political pressure, but that is what Fed chairmen
are supposed to have.
Will Bernanke show character tomorrow? Not that it matters, I predict that
he will. No rate cut. Markets will react in shock. Stay
tuned for followup analysis.
|