Dear David,
Thank you very much for your hard work and excellent research. Your level
approach to the metals has long been a beacon to follow.
Thank you.
I am writing to inquire about your opinion of the coming need for companies
to follow the FASB-157 accounting rules. There has been some speculation
on Web forums (such as PrudentBear Chat) that there could be some fall out
in the coming months as companies which have been calling derivatives and
other "mark
to model" assets cash and short-term cash on their balance sheets.
What level of risk is there that the junior mining companies might be bitten
by this bug-bear? I would imagine that any producing mines could simply point
to their ounces in production as an offset to any suddenly weakened assets
that come to light via FASB-157, but wonder what impact this might have on
the junior sector as a whole. Kind regards,
Chris
Comment: Thank you for the kind words. A lot of what makes my work
so enjoyable is hearing from subscribers such as you. Soon after the initial
fallout of the derivatives mess last fall, which several prominent resource
sector writers such as Jim Sinclair and Greg McCoach (and I) have been railing
against for some time, a number of the mining companies we follow were quick
to assure shareholders that they did not have exposure to these financial
time bombs.
You are correct to wonder if, as the new accounting rules take effect,
this might be a cause for concern. My studied response is as follows: First,
I don't believe that our sector has seen the level of participation in these
investment vehicles that has been taking place in, say, financial houses,
pension plans, and banks. Second, there is a simple way to find out ... go
to their Web site and see if they mention their involvement, or lack thereof,
in these derivatives. If they don't have a statement, call the IR of the
company in question and ask them point-blank. I think you will find them
to be upfront about it. (And if they aren't, that tells you something too,
doesn't it?)
Actually I am much less worried that the sector will be tarred with this
brush than I am about the ability of many of these "blue sky" explorers to
raise the cash they need to keep drilling. Money is going to be harder to
come by, it will cost more to get it, and shareholders will expect to see
tangible results for the expenditures. If a company is not looking to either
start production by themselves, JV with a major on a project, or at least
have some very good-looking property to prove up over the next 12-18 months,
they could be in real trouble.
My longer term view is as expressed in the past columns, we will see higher
precious metals prices by year end, but may see the summer doldrums again
this year. Four known metals personalities were recently on a "Metals Roundtable" sponsored
by Financial Sense
News Hour. Each of us were asked to forecast the gold and silver price
by the end of the year, and without exception all of us saw gold over the
recent high of $1000 per ounce, and silver over $21 per ounce.
|