|
This is another installment of my series on the US banking system and the
Asset Securitization Crisis. As a recap, let's draw a map to where we are currently.
Sections 1 through 5 are background material that is probably known to the
professional in this arena, but will make good reading for the lay person.
I used it to make sure I made judgments based on observable facts vs. media
representation and/or personal bias. I feel the section on counterparty risk
should be required reading for everybody, though. The report on PNC basically
outlines, in full detail, why I chose that bank out of 329 others, to initiate
my short foray into the regionals. Part 2 of the municpal report will be coming
soon.
- Intro:
The great housing bull run - creation of asset bubble, Declining lending
standards, lax underwriting activities increased the bubble - A comparison
with the same during the S&L crisis
- Securitization
- dissimilarity between the S&L and the Subprime Mortgage crises, The
bursting of housing bubble - declining home prices and rising foreclosure
- Counterparty
risk analyses - counterparty failure will open up another Pandora's box
- The
consumer finance sector risk is woefully unrecognized, and the US Federal
reserve to the rescue
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part I
- An
overview of my personal Regional Bank short prospects Part I: PNC Bank
- risky loans skating on razor thin capital, PNC addendum Posts One and Two
- Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure redux
In the graph below, you will see that commercial banks have gorged themselves
on consumer finance risk over the last 20 years. It is not just the investment
banks that took chances with leverage and concentration.
The primary benefit of securitization was the virtualization of the bank's
balance sheet. Through securitization, banks were able to underwrite a vast
amount of risk relative to their balance sheet capacity, by selling off the
risk to the open markets. Despite this, banks have steadily increased the amount
of risk kept on (and off, through SPEs) their books over the last 20 years,
with a forced increase of this concentration in 2007 when the securitization
market simply shut down - cutting off the liquidity spigot for these assets.
Starting at about 2004 near the height of the securitization bubble , banks
increased the pace of securitized asset retention.

At the same time the banks increased the pace of asset retention, the debt
service ratio of the lending products backing the securities started climbing
very quickly. Thus, not only were the banks increasing risk from a concentration
perspective, they were increasing risk from a credit quality perspective simultaneously.
This was all occurring during the near peak of a bubble. Unfortunately, for
most of those involved in bubbles, it is nigh impossible to see the bubble
until after it is too late! With debt service ratios so high, levels will trend
down to the mean, either through increased income or decreased debts (charge
offs).

My bet is on charge offs leading to the way. Charge offs have more than tripled
in the last 7 quarters. The last two recessions have seen charge offs average
1-2% of total loans outstanding. I believe that that macro environment, fundamentals
and general weakness of the consumer will cause an even higher level of charge
offs this time around.

What most pundits who don't follow the Boombustblog.com fail
to realize is that despite all of the fear, loathing and hoopla regarding mortgages,
foreclosures and declining home values (most of which is quite justified, may
I add), consumer loans have higher charge off rates than mortgages. That means
those credit cards and auto loans are to cause the banks more stress, at least
for now. In addition, the recoveries for these products are bound to be lower.
Real estate charge offs are increasing faster, and will probably catch up,
but if they do the combination is bound to put pressure on the businesses through
slowed consumer spending in combination with the lax debt that was consumed
by those very same businesses and cause the business loans delinquencies to
spike as well. I have been predicting a spike in business delinquincies for
the last two quarters to take effect right about now.

Loan charge offs, in aggregate, have spiked significantly during the last
two recessions and I expect them to spike even higher this time around.

Now, what do yout think all of this adds up to? Well, looking at these top
commercial banks and thrifts against the backdrop of the info just gleaned...
Delinquincies are spiking, just as I anticipated, in the risky 2nd lien product
class where high LTVs and decreasing home values portend 100% losses and zero
recoveries in many cases. In order for this to happen, though, the delinquincies
must become actual charge offs.

Well, guess what... Delinquincies are quickly becoming net charge offs!

As part of the next few posts, I will be offering part of my 2nd lien concentration
studies that I used to find even more shorts in the banking sector. I will
also review how muni losses will put the I banks at even more risk and potentially
kick off a meltdown in the CDS markets. Stay tuned...
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|