|
United States Senate, 23 May 2008
Findings of the Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
"Trading Commodities - a Very Bad Thing"
AFTER DOZING OFF through the expert testimony of five young visitors
from the financial and farming communities this week, the Senate Committee
on Homeland Security & Anything Else That Takes Our Fancy was today persuaded
by the opinions it had already formed in the cab on the way over.
Speculating in the commodity markets is a bad thing, a very bad thing indeed.
Congress ought to do all it can to protect the public interest - starting with
its own re-election.
The Committee therefore recommends closing the US commodity futures market,
and imposing sanctions on any foreign state that doesn't do the same, to prevent
speculative funds simply moving elsewhere.
This policy - undertaken for the good of the international community - will
thereby force speculators back into more socially beneficial activities, such
as trading those subprime-mortgage backed bonds now stuck on the balance sheets
of New York investment banks.
Fixing that crisis is what both the economic stimulus package and the Federal
Reserve's cash-for-crap liquidity injections are intended to achieve. Sub-zero
real rates of interest should in no way be allowed to encourage or fund trading
outside socially "good" speculations like residential real estate.
Thanks to their funds fleeing the securitized debt markets, one in 33 current
homeowners in the United States may now be heading for foreclosure, according
to the Pew Charitable Trusts' latest research. This ratio rises to one in every
18 homeowners in Arizona; in Nevada, it stands nearer one in eleven. So herding
financial speculators back into the housing market ought to become the No.1
priority for any politician seeking another term in office.
As for the matter in hand, and despite what Jeffrey Harris - chief economist
of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) - claimed in his testimony
on Wednesday, the surging price of energy and key foodstuffs has nothing whatsoever
to do with a "weak Dollar, strong demand from the emerging world economies,
geopolitical tensions in oil-producing regions, supply disruptions, unfavorable
weather, and [Congressionally-mandated] production of ethanol."
Mr. Harris's detailed refutation of our knee-jerk conclusion also fails to
stack up. Because he appeals to the "evidence" while there are clearly votes
to be won by horse-whipping speculators live on PBS.
"Prices have risen sharply for many commodities that have neither developed
futures markets (e.g. durham wheat, steel, iron ore, coal, etc.) nor institutional
fund investments (Minneapolis wheat and Chicago rice)," claimed Mr. Harris. "Markets
where [big fund] index trading is greatest as a percentage of total open interest
(live cattle and hog futures) have actually suffered from falling prices during
the past year.
"The level of speculation in the agriculture commodity and the crude oil markets
has remained relatively constant in percentage terms as prices have risen...[while
in agriculture and crude oil markets] speculators such as managed money traders
are both buyers and sellers."
Moreover, futures-market participants in general would have us believe that
for every bullish speculation pushing prices skywards, there's another trader
taking the other side of the deal, betting that prices will go down! But that
preposterous idea would undermine the bar-room logic of the Committee's pre-hearing
decision. And the fact is that speculators trading wheat, pork bellies and
crude oil are as good as stealing bread, bacon and a nice drive to the coast
this weekend from hard-working American families. The fact that one trader
sells a futures contract every time a speculator buys one is entirely irrelevant.
The Committee found it constructive, therefore, to have its conclusion humored
by Michael W. Masters of Masters Capital Management, who told us that "what
we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of participant
in the commodities futures markets - institutional investors.
"Specifically, these are corporate and government pension funds, sovereign
wealth funds, university endowments and other institutional investors," he
explained - naming pretty much everyone if you follow the money all along the
chain! But with the key figures of "mom and pop" investors being absent from
Masters' list - and with the players who do appear depriving Wall Street investment
banks of much-needed capital every time they go long bananas or whatever -
it's highly dangerous that "these investors now account on average for a larger
share of outstanding commodities futures contracts than any other market participant."
Ha! That made a nice retort to the assertion by Thomas Erickson, chairman
of the Commodity Markets Council (CMC), that the extra volume brought into
the raw materials markets by hedge funds and institutional investors "boosts
liquidity, aids in price discovery, and enhances market efficiency.
"Futures markets today reflect global economics and trends," he went on, forgetting
that there's no votes in macro-economic trends, least of all in the downward
trend of the US Dollar's purchasing power as dictated by the currency markets
- another bolt-hole for speculative wrong-doers that the Committee should like
to investigate and shut down in due course.
"Speculative activity in futures markets may influence day-to-day prices,
but it is powerless in the face of larger, fundamental forces," Mr. Erickson
continued as if anyone cared. "If prices begin to retreat tomorrow, speculative
activity will follow that retreat, not cause it."
Erickson then made the scandalous and thoroughly anti-social claim that "markets
are generally the most efficient filters of information." But how does the
wider community benefit from information? What communal good is achieved by
seeing the Dollar shrink against virtually every essential asset other than
housing and common stocks?
Amid these difficult economic times, therefore, the Committee hereby proposes
a new Bill. Once passed, it shall:
i) Identify & shutdown all speculative trading (other than that
required by producers and processors needing a counterparty to hedge their
commercial positions);
ii) Enforce the immediate closure of all overseas commodity futures
markets, thereby killing all speculation worldwide and in no way driving it
straight onto supermarket shelves instead;
iii) Establish a new committee to replace the open market, agreeing
and setting price limits for oil, corn, wheat and whatever else takes our fancy;
iii) Imprison any private individual - including but not limited to
hedge fund managers, foreign government agents and private US citizens - found
hoarding key resources in their kitchen cupboards at home.
What with the Memorial Day weekend now upon us, the Committee has yet to finalize
a name for this Bill to promote such social, communal controls and planning.
But suggestions will be gratefully received c/o the Senate from Tuesday.
Something using the words "social...community...control...planning" will do
fine.
|