|
This is the 10th installment of Reggie Middleton on the Asset Securitization
Crisis - a comparison of today's credit crisis to the S&L debacle.
The Asset Securitization Crisis Analysis roadmap to date:
- Intro:
The great housing bull run - creation of asset bubble, Declining lending
standards, lax underwriting activities increased the bubble - A comparison
with the same during the S&L crisis
- Securitization
- dissimilarity between the S&L and the Subprime Mortgage crises, The
bursting of housing bubble - declining home prices and rising foreclosure
- Counterparty
risk analyses - counterparty failure will open up another Pandora's box
- The
consumer finance sector risk is woefully unrecognized, and the US Federal
reserve to the rescue
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part I
- An
overview of my personal Regional Bank short prospects Part I: PNC Bank
- risky loans skating on razor thin capital, PNC addendum Posts One and Two
- Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure
redux
- More
on the banking backdrop, we've never had so many loans!
- As
I see it, these 32 banks and thrfts are in deep doo-doo!
- A
little more on HELOCs, 2nd lien loans and rose colored glasses
Will Countrywide be the next shoe to drop?
We have started on Countrywide counterparty research and are looking carefully
into both BAC and CFC's latest financial statements trying to find details
on the CDS agreements which could throw some light on the counterparties and
the ones who have significant credit exposure to CFC.
From BAC's perspective, many market participants are now expecting it to renegotiate
the proposed $4 billion deal for CFC acquisition at $0-$2 per share. In the
first quarter of 2008, BAC's first quarter profit declined 77% to $1.21 billion,
or 23 cents a share against the market expectations of 41 cents per share.
In 1Q 08, the bank has written down $1.47 billion of collateralized debt obligations
(CDOs) and $439 million of loans. Furthermore, the bank increased its provision
for credit losses to $6.01 billion in 1Q 08 from $1.24 billion as credit costs
increased in the home-equity, small-business and homebuilder portfolios. The
bank's net charge offs almost doubled to $2.72 billion in 1Q 08 as compared
to $1.43 billion in 1Q 07. These delinquincies and charge offs are understated
for many banks. Those who are feeling too much heat are doing things such as
purposely under-reporting delinquincies and charge offs, preferring instead
to let people live in their houses without paying rather than take the accounting
hit of reporting the bad news, exstending the period in which accounts are
qualified as charge offs, knowingly allowing servicing companies to operating
at a decided lag in reporting delinquincies, etc. So far, BAC has written
down $14.8 billion in credit losses and is working to replenish the capital
base. In the month of April and May 2008, the bank sold almost $6.7 billion
in perpetual preferred stocks which includes $2.7 billion of preferred stocks
in May 2008 at a coupon rate 8.2%, and $4.0 billion in April 2008 at a coupon
rate of 8.125%. The bank had also sold $6.0 billion of preferred stock in January
2008 at a coupon rate of 8.0%.

On the other hand, CFC has credit risk on its balance sheet in the form of
loan portfolio, subprime securities, home equity line of credit (HELOC) securities,
warranties on loans sold, and loans held outside of banking operations. At
the end of 1Q 2008, CFC had a $95 billion loan portfolio comprising $28 billion
of option Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), $14 billion in Home equity line
of credit (HELOC), $20 billion in second liens, and $19 billion of hybrid ARMs

BAC, in a recent filing with the SEC mentioned that there was no assurance
that any of CFC's outstanding debt would be redeemed, assumed or guaranteed..
Paul Miler, an analyst with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, in a recent note said
that BAC is likely to renegotiate the purchase price the deal in the range
of $0-$2 per share, as CFC's loan portfolio continues to deteriorate so
much that it currently has negative equity. Considering that BAC is already
having enough trouble to handle on its own books, it is highly likely that
it may renegotiate or walk out of the proposed deal. (http://www.housingwire.com/2008/05/05/bofa-countrywide-deal/)

If the deal does not go through, a number of market players will suffer -
such as the monoline insurer I analyzed a few months back (see Reggie
Middleton on Assured Guaranty) as well as MBIA and AMBAC, both of whom
I have performed extensive analysis and shorts on last year and the beginning
of this year. See:
- A
Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by Reggie
Middleton.
- Ambac
is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More than $8 Billion of Losses
with Just a $2.26 Billion Market Cap
- Follow
up to the Ambac Analysis
- Bill
Ackman of Pershing Square - How to save the Monolines
for more info. The
additional writedowns of the investment banks and their excessive leverage
puts them at risk to suspect counterparties. This was illustrated using hedgefunds
(Banks, Brokers, & Bullsh1+
part 2) and monolines. I actually used the list of Ambac clients to (successfully)
look for short candidates. Assured Guaranty is highly exposed to Countrywide
through HELOCs. AGO, in its 1Q 2008 report mentioned that it has a net par
outstanding of $2.0 billion for transactions with CFC of which $1.4 billion
were written in the financial guaranty direct segment. AGO, in its earnings
call said it has underwritten some BBB rated HELOCs, the largest of which were
the two Countrywide transactions in the direct segment which comprised 90%
of AGO's direct HELOC exposure.

AGO believe the possible range of losses from its countrywide exposure is
$0-$100 million, after tax. Considering that a decent proportion of thee HELOCs
represent the potential for 100% losses with no recoveries due to their geographic
location and high LTVs, I really believe AGO is understating their exposure
to loss a tad bit.
As for the other two insurers who I have alleged to be effectively insolvent
last year, let's take a glance at their CDS exposure (this excludes all municipal
exposue which is on the rise for risk of loss, see Municipal
Credit Risk and the Asset Securitization Crisis, part 2).

The Partial Cost of Monoline ABS Failure |
| |
Par |
Equity |
Exposure
Ratio |
|
| Bear Stearns |
$15,673,088,703 |
$11,793,000,000 |
132.90% |
BSC
ABS inventory |
| Morgan Stanley |
$22,956,101,796 |
$31,269,000,000 |
73.41% |
MS
ABS Inventory |
| Lehman Brothers |
$3,151,328,632 |
$22,490,000,000 |
14.01% |
LEH
ABS Inventory |
| Citigroup |
$8,100,028,623 |
$127,113,000,000 |
6.37% |
C
ABS Inventory |
| Countrywide |
$12,639,385,566 |
$15,252,230,000 |
82.87% |
CFC
ABS Inventory |
| Wells Fargo |
$4,700,835,231 |
$47,738,000,000 |
9.85% |
Wells
Fargo ABS Inventory |
| Goldman Sachs |
$18,673,869,328 |
$42,800,000,000 |
43.63% |
GS
ABS Inventory |
| WaMu |
$7,658,982,498 |
$23,941,000,000 |
31.99% |
WaMu
ABS Inventory |
| Merrill Lynch |
$10,224,387,634 |
$38,626,000,000 |
26.47% |
ML
ABS Inventory |
| Centex |
$511,740,636 |
$3,197,130,000 |
16.01% |
CTX
ABS Inventory |
| Wachovia |
$5,328,228,928 |
$76,872,000,000 |
6.93% |
Wachovia
ABS Inventory |
| Totals |
$118,950,151,688 |
$477,918,010,000 |
24.89% |
|
I believe that if Countrywide were to go bankrupt, it would probably drag
a monoline of two down the tubes with it. Since these guys are so incestuous,
in that they have a tight knit ring that reinsures each other in lieu of sending
the risk outside of the circle - adverse selection and risk concentration is
rampant - that is in my humble opinion of course. If a big monoline or two
go down, they may drag a big bank or two down with them. We have already lost
Bear Stearns, just as I predicted in October and January (see Is
this the Breaking of the Bear?). Looking at the equity exposure chart above,
the Riskiest Bank on the Street is next in line (see Reggie
Middleton on the Street's Riskiest Bank - Update).

For those that don't know, AGO, MBIA and Ambac use credit default swaps to
guarantee these deals. I have posted and entire background analysis on the
CDS market and believe that this may be the the next shoe to drop in this Asset
Securitization Crisis (see my list of posts on the crisis here,
and the CDS market here).
This is a huge, unregulated market rife with cowboy style counterparty credit
risk management, if any at all. The market dwarfs the markets of US stocks,
mortgage securities and US treasuries by a multiple of at least 2. The Fed
does not want this to come tumbling down.

As you can see, this is a huge market and Bank of America has the 3rd largest
exposure in the WORLD (that's right, the WHOLE WIDE WORLD).

In addition, they have the 3rd highest concentration of subinvestment grade
risk. The company in the front of this list was paid at leat $50 billion by
the government to take in an insolvent bank. I really wonder what deal BAC
will be able to cut, or is the CDS risk posed from a Countrywide collapse not
great enough??? Exactly how many banks does the Fed plan on bailing out? If
you have been following my series and blog and are willing to read everything
in detail until the end of the series, you should come to the conclusion that
there is going to be a lot of bailing out needed.
To make a long story short, if BAC does go forward with this Countrywide deal
with no back stop and concessions from the guys with the green ink powered
helicopter, I am going to rocket them to the top of my short list and will
probably go to them for a HELOC to fund the short on a more reliabe basis than
brokerage margin accounts! We are looking out for more information on who could
be the other players to suffer the most if BAC-CFC deal doesn't go through.
I'll keep you updated through intermittent posts as time permits.
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|