|
Global stock markets topped out on the back of the sub-prime/credit debacle
in October 2007. Prices subsequently moved lower until reaching climatic bottoms
in January/March this year, triggering rallies throughout the world until a
few days ago. The big question investors are grappling with at this stage is
whether the rise in prices has simply been a bear market rally, or whether
we are back in a primary bull market.
I have previously said: "Whereas I am doubtful about the longevity of the
rally, I am also not in the Armageddon school. Is the answer perhaps a 'muddle-through'
market, characterized by below-average returns? That is my hunch, for what
it's worth." (See post entitled "Poll
of the Week: Stock Markets - Which Way Jose?" of 25 April 2008.)
In searching for answers, it is appropriate trying to get a grip on the direction
of banking stocks as these are usually a good indicator of the market as a
whole, especially given the large proportion of financial services of many
major stock markets.
The following is a long-term chart of the S&P Banking Index relative to
the S&P 500 Index, showing clearly the massive underperformance of banking
stocks since the middle of 2002:

Sources: Bloomberg; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
I have pulled out a few fundamental graphs pertaining to the US situation
in order to assist in gauging the lie of the land.
Firstly, as far as lending standards are concerned, US banks are still in
tightening mode.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
But it would appear that the lending standards could start easing during the
current or next quarter, at least when considering the historical relationship
with the Fed funds rate.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
Interestingly, banking stocks have historically started outperforming the
S&P 500 Index around two to three quarters before lending standards ease.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; Bloomberg; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
The relative performance of banking stocks is largely driven by the "mortgage
margin". The latter has been defined for this purpose as the difference between
the 30-year mortgage yield and the 30-year government bond yield, serving as
a measure of risk in the housing market. The most recent numbers (not shown
on the graph) indicate a significant swing in the mortgage margin as the long
bond yield rose while the contract rate on 30-year, fixed-rate conventional
home mortgages fell.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; Bloomberg; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
Taking the analysis one step further, the mortgage margin in turn leads the
lending standards by about two quarters.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
The next graph shows the relationship between the mortgage margin and the
Fed funds rate.

Sources: Federal Reserve Board; I-Net; Plexus Asset Management.
Putting all this together, it would appear that the underperformance of US
banking stocks relative to the S&P 500 Index could be on its last legs.
This conclusion is based on the mortgage margin appearing to be peaking, the
Fed funds rate leading the lending standards by approximately three quarters,
as well as the relationship between the mortgage margin and the Fed funds rate.
Caveat emptor: This is a relative analysis and does not provide a tool for
short-term timing decisions. It does, however, alert one to the factors at
play regarding the performance of banking stocks - factors beginning to point
to the possible initial stages of the long-term bottoming out in the relative
performance of banking stocks and, ultimately, to better prospects for stock
markets as a whole.
Did you enjoy this posting? If so, click here to
subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.
|