|
Yep, I said it. The monoline business model that MBIA and Ambac used relied
on the ignorance of the clients and market participants to survive. These companies
attempted to undercut the market pricing of risk - charging clients consistently
less than what Mr. Market would, and pocketing the difference, all the while
doing so with 100x plus leverage against products with sparse or unknown loss
histories. It was bound to hit the wall. In a few hours, I'm probably going
to release some research that shows how regional banks have backed themselves
up against the failure wall using 7x to 20x leverage, so just imagine 100x
plus leverage...
We
are now about to close a chapter in this book, but fear not fellow blogophytes,
there is a new chapter whose 1st page is about to be turned...
From Bloomberg : MBIA,
Ambac Signal They May Give Up Aaa Battle After Moody's Threatens Cut
MBIA Inc. and Ambac
Financial Group Inc. may give up attempts to retain Aaa credit ratings
of their bond insurance units after Moody's Investors Service put them under
review for a second time this year.
The world's largest bond insurers said they won't raise capital after New
York-based Moody's said yesterday that the most likely result of its examination
would be a downgrade of the companies' insurance financial strength rankings.
| |
1 day after Cuomo
says, "The Truth or Else", guess what happens... Expect downgrades
on more structured products as well
June 4 (Bloomberg) -- New York Attorney General Andrew
Cuomo is nearing an agreement with Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's
and Fitch Ratings that would let the credit-rating firms avoid sanctions
over their role in the subprime-mortgage crisis, people with knowledge
of the accord said.
The companies won't admit wrongdoing and will have six
months to implement policies such as a new fee structure and increased
disclosure about the deals they rate, said the people, who declined to
be identified before a public announcement that might come as early as
this week.
Cuomo would end his nine-month probe of the ratings companies,
started as part of a broader investigation into the mortgage industry.
Cuomo said in February he was focused on "the role played by the ratings
agencies in the mortgage meltdown" that caused more than $386 billion
in credit losses and asset write downs at banks. Investors had anticipated
Cuomo would force bigger changes, and Moody's
Corp. and McGraw-Hill
Cos., parent of S&P, rose in New York trading. |
I'm not going to say I told you so...
I instituted a short campaign in September of last year,
and started releasing research and opinion about that date as well. In
November, I put out some strongly opinionated stuff and got a lot of
feedback.
This is part one of a two part response to comments and
questions on the recent events concerning the Ambac and MBIA. The second
part will be a forensic marking to market of Ambac's portfolio based
upon the recent E*Trade sale. Required reading for this article includes:
- A
Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by
Reggie Middleton.
- Ambac
is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More than $8 Billion of Losses
with Just a $2.26 Billion Market Cap
- Follow
up to the Ambac Analysis
- Monolines
swoon, CDOs go boom & I really wonder why the ratings agencies
are given any credibility
- Bill
Ackman of Pershing Square - How to save the Monolines
For those interested in the history, see Insurers
and Insurance in m blog. There are literally 100's of pages of
opinion and analysis over the last 9 months.

|
The dominoes should
start to fall...
If any body believes I have an inkling of knowing my way
around these investment markets, I strongly suggest you re-read my Asset
Securitization Crisis series, in particular, "Counterparty
risk analyses - counter-party failure will open up another Pandora's
box" (must read for anyone who is not a CDS specialist). We will
be entering into the next phase of the crisis, for I believe that the
CDS market will start showing fissures that will illuminate rampant counterparty
credit risks through the global capital markets. These insurers used
CDS almost exclusively for their structured product wraps and insurance.
|
Moody's originally put Ambac and MBIA under review in January, only to affirm
the ratings of MBIA a month later and Ambac in March. The credit rating company
cited "meaningful uncertainty" about Ambac's ability to regain market share
since the first reviews, and "diminished new business prospects" for MBIA in
yesterday's announcement. This uncertainty is well grounded.
"You can't go to somebody to raise capital if you don't know what the rules
for capital raising would be," Armonk, New York-based MBIA Chief Executive
Officer Jay
Brown told reporters yesterday. "Goal posts move, targets change."
On the surface, he has a valid point here, but the truth of the matter is he
know full well that the company didn't deserve a AAA rating. They played along
with the phony, funny money rules of the credit wizard, and when it was time
for them to be "funny monied", they cry foul????
Moody's decision is "liberating" for New York-based Ambac, and may enable
it to consider options other than selling stock or debt, Doug
Renfield-Miller, an executive vice president at the company, said at an
investor conference. I've always alleged that it was a waste of resources and
a destruction of shareholder value to chase an ephemeral AAA rating that you
both never deserved and couldn't retain. IMHO, these companies are pretty much
finished as the guarantors they once were.
Wider Losses
MBIA and
Ambac raised a combined $4.1 billion in the past six months to convince Moody's,
Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings they had enough capital to justify
their top rankings. Fitch cut Ambac to AA in January and MBIA to AA in April.
Notice how Fitch is not part of this "settlement". They worked hard to save
face and regain their credibility. I actually covered my shorts on these two
insurers after booking fat profits, but reinstated
them (See "Short Seller Dreamin') after hearing that the returning MBIA
CEO who spearheaded the drive into structured products requested that Fitch
no longer review the company. That was a bone headed move for a company whose
stability is in question and whose ratings agencies credibility is already
called into serious question. Such management blunders screamed out, "SHORT
ME SOME MORE, PLEASE!!!"
MBIA Insurance Corp.'s financial strength rating likely will fall to the Aa
range, though a drop to the A category is possible, Moody's said yesterday
in a statement. Ambac Assurance Corp.'s ranking will probably be cut to Aa,
Moody's also said.
"I don't think they're going to respond in any way to keep the rating,"
said Jim
Ryan, an analyst with Morningstar Inc. in Chicago. "I don't think there's
anything they can do."
MBIA may start a new insurance business with $900 million it raised in February,
Brown said. Actually, I think the Insurance Commissioner of NY will want you
to keep that money to pay policy claims and back your liabilities... Ambac shareholders suggested
the company stop writing new business and enter a state of "run off,"
where it winds down as policies mature, Renfield-Miller said. Best idea yet.
While raising capital isn't likely, "we're not giving up with Moody's or the
other rating agencies. We're going to continue our dialogue, and try to convince
them they've erred," Renfield-Miller said. Keep hope alive. Their own asses
are on the line now (see side bar). Know more credit wizard cartoonery. See
the cartoons, credit
wizard one and two.
Market Disconnect
Ambac reported a $1.66 billion net
loss in the first quarter after $3.1 billion in charges related to subprime-
mortgage securities it insured. MBIA lost $2.4
billion as the value of derivatives it sells to guarantee debt tumbled $3.58
billion.
MBIA, which
had plunged 90 percent in the past year, dropped $1.06, or 15.8 percent, to
$5.63 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading yesterday, the lowest since
June 1988. Ambac,
down 97 percent in the past year, fell 51 cents, or 17 percent, to $2.49, a
new low.
"The disconnect between the market's perception and the rating agencies' assigned
ratings has finally become an elephant in the room too big to ignore," Kathleen
Shanley, an analyst at Chicago-based bond research firm Gimme Credit, wrote
in a report yesterday. Actually, the NYS regulators and DA got tired of the
lying bullsh1t!
The prospect of downgrades earlier this year roiled markets because of concern
that guarantees for more than $1 trillion of debt may be worthless. The problem
is no less significant now then it was then. Let's see if the media proffers
a muted reaction.
AAA Focus
Until yesterday, MBIA and Ambac executives said they were focused on keeping
Aaa ratings.
"Our goal is to rebuild confidence and to insulate our ratings from future
volatility," Ambac CEO Michael
Callen said at the company's annual meeting on June 3.
Brown told shareholders at MBIA's annual meeting in May that "we are very
comfortable that we have raised adequate capital."
Credit-default swaps tied to MBIA's insurance unit rose to a record. Sellers
of five-year contracts demanded 23.5 percent up front and 5 percent a year
yesterday, according to London- based data provider CMA Datavision. That's
up from 18.5 percent initially and 5 percent a year two days ago. Wow, I generally
don't buy CDS, but it does seem to have been a very profitable trade. You know,
the devil is in the details though. In order to monetize those paper profits,
you have to unwind the traded - you know... Brokers,
Bankers, and Bullsh1t. It will be interesting to see who gets stiffed for
those profits they thought they had, and what happens to those funds NAV calculations.
Side pockets, here we come!!!
The up front cost to protect Ambac debt jumped to 25.5 percent from 21.5 percent,
CMA prices show. The contracts pay the buyer face value in exchange for the
underlying securities should the company fail to adhere to its debt agreements
or if it can't make good on its guarantees.
"It's next to impossible" for the companies to raise capital, Andrew
Wessel, an analyst with JPMorgan Securities in New York, told Bloomberg
Television.
| The Partial Cost of Monoline ABS Failure |
| |
Par |
Equity |
Exposure
Ratio |
|
| Bear Stearns* |
$15,673,088,703 |
$11,793,000,000 |
132.90% |
BSC
ABS inventory |
| Morgan Stanley** |
$22,956,101,796 |
$31,269,000,000 |
73.41% |
MS
ABS Inventory |
| Lehman Brothers*** |
$3,151,328,632 |
$22,490,000,000 |
14.01% |
LEH
ABS Inventory |
| Citigroup |
$8,100,028,623 |
$127,113,000,000 |
6.37% |
C
ABS Inventory |
| Countrywide**** |
$12,639,385,566 |
$15,252,230,000 |
82.87% |
CFC
ABS Inventory |
| Wells Fargo**** |
$4,700,835,231 |
$47,738,000,000 |
9.85% |
Wells
Fargo
ABS Inventory |
| Goldman Sachs |
$18,673,869,328 |
$42,800,000,000 |
43.63% |
GS
ABS Inventory |
| WaMu**** |
$7,658,982,498 |
$23,941,000,000 |
31.99% |
WaMu
ABS Inventory |
| Merrill Lynch |
$10,224,387,634 |
$38,626,000,000 |
26.47% |
ML
ABS Inventory |
| Centex***** |
$511,740,636 |
$3,197,130,000 |
16.01% |
CTX
ABS Inventory |
| Wachovia**** |
$5,328,228,928 |
$76,872,000,000 |
6.93% |
Wachovia
ABS Inventory |
| Totals |
$118,950,151,688 |
$477,918,010,000 |
24.89% |
|
* collapsed two months after I warned on the blog: Is
this the Breaking of the Bear?
** the most exposed bank to counterparty credit risk on the
street: The Riskiest
Bank on the Street and Reggie
Middleton on the Street's Riskiest Bank - Update
*** at risk due to the largest proportionate MBS inventory
on the street, effectively un hedgeable at this amount and in these markets
**** card carrying members of the Doo-Doo bank 32 list. See:As
I see it, these 32 banks and thrifts are in deep doo-doo! and Doo-Doo
bank drill down, part 1 - Wells Fargo.
***** Centex and Lennar have (had) some of the largest subprime
mortgage operations in the country. They don't publicize it much, but I am
sure they are getting stuck with a lot of paper, as well as real estate on
their books. I have an update to Lennar which I will hopefully get to post
in a few days. Till then, see the older analyses: Lennar
Insolvent: Enron redux??? and Voodoo,
Zombies, Lennar�s Off Balance Sheet Accounting and Other
Things of Mystery & Myth.
For those who haven't read them, see :Banks,
Brokers, & Bullsh1+ part 1 and Banks,
Brokers, & Bullsh1+ part 2
Fall out from the municipal sector, most of whom have already
been granted monoline immunity from regulators (they knew
this was coming and actually expect ratings to fall to junk status ): Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part I and Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part 2 (should be read by
whoever is not a muni expert - this newsbyte
may be worth reading as well)
Fallout before the US trading day starts:
Asia-Pacific
Bond Risk Rises to Six-Week High on MBIA, Ambac: The cost of protecting
Asia-Pacific bonds from default increased to a six-week high, led by banks
and consumer lenders, after Moody's Investors Service threatened to cut the
ratings of MBIA
Inc. and Ambac Financial Corp.
The potential loss of the two bond insurers' top Aaa credit rankings renewed
concern that guarantees for more than $1 trillion of debt may be worthless,
leading to more losses in global credit markets. The first downgrade reviews
in January boosted Asian credit-default-swap benchmark indexes to what was
then a record.
"It just shows, you can never price in enough bad news," said Tim
Condon, head of Asia research at ING Groep NV in Singapore. "There's
a bout of credit angst."
The Markit iTraxx Japan index rose 1 basis point to 91 as of 2:23 p.m. in
Tokyo, according to Morgan Stanley. Australia's benchmark default-swap index
advanced 2.5 to 110.5, Credit Suisse Group AG prices show. Rising prices suggest
deteriorating investor perceptions of credit quality.
Contracts on Macquarie Group Ltd., Australia's biggest investment bank, posted
the largest increase among the world's financial companies, according to data
compiled by Bloomberg. Credit-default swaps on Macquarie's senior and subordinated
bonds both gained 5 basis points to 145 and 230 respectively, according to
Citigroup Inc. prices.
Japanese
Notes Advance as Stock Losses Boost Demand for Debt June ...:
June 5 (Bloomberg) -- Japanese five-year notes rose
on speculation a decline in the Nikkei
225 Stock Average boosted demand for the relative safety of government
debt.
Yields approached a two-week low on concern credit-market losses may spread
as U.S. and European financial firms release earnings. Moody's Investors Service
said yesterday it may downgrade the world's biggest bond insurers and Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. lowered its rating on the Japanese banking sector.
"While inflation is still the biggest focus of the market, some attention
is paid to credit market concerns before earnings results of financial institutions,
leading to debt buying," said Atsushi
Ito, a strategist at Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co. in Tokyo.
"Declines in stocks added support."
|