|
FCNBC is reporting Fed May Ease
Rules on Private Equity Bank Stakes.
The U.S. Federal Reserve is considering steps to make it easier for private-equity
firms and others to invest in banks, the Wall Street Journal reported on
Thursday, a move that could open the door to more capital for cash-starved
banks.
Fed officials recently have met with big buyout firms, including J.C. Flowers,
Carlyle Group, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Warburg Pincus, and banking lawyers
to discuss the obstacles, according to people familiar with the matter.
Under federal law, to own more than 24.9 percent of a bank, an entity must
register as a bank holding company, which is subject to heavy regulation
and can be forced to serve as a "source of strength" for the bank, the Journal
said.
Ownership of more than 9.9 percent of a bank also subjects the entity to
regulatory scrutiny to ensure that it isn't controlling -- or even influencing
-- the bank's operations.
The Fed can't change those laws, but it has room to maneuver in how it interprets
them.
This announcement today is not unexpected. It is in strict accordance with the Fed
Uncertainty Principle.
Uncertainty Principle Corollary Number Four: The Fed simply does not care
whether its actions are illegal or not. The Fed is operating under the principle
that it's easier to get forgiveness than permission. And forgiveness is just
another means to the desired power grab it is seeking.
When it comes to new rules or bending the rules, if the Fed does not like
an interpretation, it will simply make the one it wants. The key point now,however,
is the Fed feels a personal need to intervene directly in the markets to help
line up sources for capital.
If the worst was over as Bernanke suggested (See Things
That Have Not Yet Happened) then why is there a need for these kind of
actions?
Have the Sovereign Wealth Funds in Singapore, China, etc. had enough? It's
looking more like that every day. Yet the writeoffs continue.
Citigroup Writeoff Hit Parade Continues
The Citigroup (C) writeoff hit parade chalked up another score today. Goldman
says, Citigroup
May Write Down $8.9 Billion.
Citigroup Inc., the bank that's posted the biggest losses from the collapse
of the U.S. mortgage market, may take an additional $8.9 billion in net writedowns
in the second quarter, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said.
"We see multiple headwinds for Citigroup," such as risks of further writedowns,
higher consumer provisions, and the potential need for additional capital
raisings, dividend cuts or asset sales, Goldman said.
Headwinds?
These aren't headwinds, this is a series of hurricanes one after another.
There are Many
Hurricanes, Many Eyes and most have still not hit shore.
Yahoo!Finance is reporting Citigroup
sinks to 10-year low, Goldman urges short sale.
Citigroup Inc (C) shares fell to their lowest level in nearly a decade after
a Goldman Sachs & Co analyst said investors should sell the largest U.S.
bank's stock short as losses mount from troubled debt.
William Tanona, the Goldman analyst, added Citigroup to Goldman's "Americas
conviction sell" list and cut his price target on the stock to $16 from $20.
Where were all these downgrade and sell recommendations when they were needed?
These problems were visible $30 ago.
Regardless, someone needs to step up to the plate with a realistic number
that won't be increased every other week. It's time to stop playing these piecemeal
games. There is no trust anymore because no one can possibly believe "this
is the last one".
There are more hurricanes approaching: credit cards, commercial real estate,
Pay Option Arms, home equity loans, etc., etc. I am quite sure that $8.9 billion
will not be enough to cover the upcoming hurricane damage.
But don't take my word for it. Bernanke's actions prove it.
|