|
Along with its "final" estimate of first-quarter GDP, the BEA also reported
its revised estimate of first-quarter corporate profits. Compared with the
fourth quarter of 2007, corporate profits from current operations were estimated
to have declined 0.3% in the first quarter of 2008 rather than the 0.3% increase
originally reported. Looking at total profits on a year-over-year basis, they
were up 1.0% in the first quarter. But, as shown in Chart 1, profits generated
from domestic operations contracted 4.8% -- the third consecutive
quarter in which year-over-year domestically-generated corporate profits contracted.
If total profits are increasing year-over-year, but domestically-generated
profits are contracting, then it must be that profits generated from overseas
operations are increasing. And that is what is shown in Chart 2. Economic growth
in the rest of the world has held up better than it has in the U.S. So, some
of these profit increases from overseas operations are volume driven. But a
depreciating U.S. dollar also plays a role. As the dollar depreciates, profits
earned abroad in terms of foreign currencies translate into higher dollar profits
when repatriated. On a year-over-year basis, the dollar was down 9.2% vs. other
major currencies. So, the weaker dollar is inflating U.S. corporate profits.
Chart 1

Chart 2

As Merrill Lynch's North American chief economist, David Rosenberg, reminds
us, it is profits generated from domestic operations that influence
domestic hiring. As Chart 3 shows, in recent quarters both financial sector
as well as nonfinancial sector domestically-generated profits have been contracting.
We bet the contraction in nonfinancial profits would be even more severe if
energy corporation profits were excluded. One takeaway here is look for more
firing rather than hiring over the remainder of the year as a result of weak
domestically-generated profits. I believe that domestically-generated profits
going forward will be adversely affected by slower growth in physical volumes
and squeezed margins due to the inability to pass on to the final purchaser
very much of the higher commodity-input price increases.
Chart 3

First-Quarter GDP - "Final" Estimate
The table below traces the revisions to first-quarter GDP. In real terms,
growth in real GDP went from 0.6% annualized in the advance estimate, to 0.9%
in the preliminary estimate, to 1.0% in the final estimate. These are insignificant
revisions. You can be the judge by perusing the revisions at your leisure in
the table below.

One of my readers' questions generated an hypothesis that real GDP growth
could be biased upward if nonfarm payrolls also are biased upward. Nonfarm
payrolls are an important input into the calculation of other variables, which,
in turn, are inputs into the calculation of real GDP. I believe that nonfarm
payroll growth is being overstated because of the birth/death adjustment. As
Chart 4 shows, in the 12 months ended May, total nonfarm payrolls increased
104 thousand. But excluding the birth/death adjustment, total nonfarm payrolls contracted by
726 thousand. If the contribution of the birth/death adjustment to the change
in nonfarm payrolls were relatively constant, I would not be suspicious of
the establishment employment data. But the contribution started moving up in
2007 as economic growth slowed and skyrocketed to 798% in the 12 months ended
May 2008 (see Chart 5). If nonfarm payrolls have been significantly overstated
of late because of a flawed birth/death adjustment, then it is a good bet that
real GDP also has been overstated.
Chart 4

Chart 5

|
Paul L. Kasriel, Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
The information herein is based on sources which The Northern Trust Company
believes to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness.
Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your
investment decisions.
Copyright © 2005-2009 The Northern
Trust Company
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|