|
For gold bugs, the past few years have been kind of peaceful, intellectually
speaking. Because they understood the dynamic of fiat currency leading to excessive
borrowing leading to financial crisis, they were neither confused about what
was happening nor swayed by the gibberish that passed for expert opinion. Alan
Greenspan could ramble and Larry Kudlow could rant, but who cared? In the end
the laws of economics would prevail; housing would tank, inflation would surge,
and gold would soar. Today's world looks pretty much the way Doug Casey or
James Turk would have predicted, had you asked them a decade ago. So while
the talking heads talked, the gold bugs calmly accumulated precious metals
and shorted the financials, and won big. They didn't have to change anyone's
mind or win any arguments. All they had to do was see clearly and invest accordingly.
But that's about to change, because the next stage of the process will be
a real debate. When the fiat currency/welfare state/military industrial complex
system finally implodes, Americans will have to figure out what kind of society
to rebuild from the rubble. Barring a coup, the majority will decide, which
means people who value the rule of law and sound money will have to have to
argue effectively in favor of those ideals. And they'll face an uphill battle,
because, as in the 1930s, the loudest voices will be those blaming capitalism
and freedom, and calling for an enlightened state to save us from ourselves.
Those arguments will strike a chord because, after decades of wealth-without-effort,
most Americans lack a clear understanding of this stuff. Most won't immediately
grasp concepts like Constitutional limits on government power, and many will
buy the "bankers and rich people bad, government good" arguments of populists
hoping to use the crisis to consolidate power in Washington.
So just when the gold bugs could be kicking back and enjoying the fruits of
their prescience, they'll be pulled back into the stream of history. They'll
have to debate, argue, and maybe fight to avoid living out their lives in a
dictatorship.
In Saturday's
Wall Street Journal, James Grant, editor of Grant's Interest Rate Observer,
published a long piece that offers some ammunition for the good guys. Here
are a few excerpts:
Why No Outrage?
The American people are famously slow to anger, but they are outdoing themselves
in long suffering today. In the wake of the "greatest failure of ratings
and risk management ever," to quote the considered judgment of the mortgage-research
department of UBS, Wall Street wears a political bullseye. Yet the politicians
take no pot shots.
Wall Street is off the political agenda in 2008 for reasons we may only
guess about. Possibly, in this time of widespread public participation in
the stock market, "Wall Street" is really "Main Street." Or maybe Wall Street,
its old self, owns both major political parties and their candidates. Or,
possibly, the $4.50 gasoline price has absorbed every available erg of populist
anger, or -- yet another possibility -- today's financial failures are too
complex to stick in everyman's craw.
I have another theory, and that is that the old populists actually won.
This is their financial system. They had demanded paper money, federally
insured bank deposits and a heavy governmental hand in the distribution of
credit, and now they have them. The Populist Party might have lost the elections
in the hard times of the 1890s. But it won the future.
They got their government-controlled money (the Federal Reserve opened for
business in 1914), and their government-directed credit (Fannie Mae and the
Federal Home Loan Banks were creatures of Great Depression No. 2; Freddie
Mac came along in 1970). In 1971, they got their pure paper dollar. So today,
the Fed can print all the dollars it deems expedient and the unwell federal
mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, combine for $1.5 trillion in
on-balance sheet mortgage assets and dominate the business of mortgage origination
(in the fourth quarter of last year, private lenders garnered all of a 19%
market share). Thus, the Wall Street of the Morgans and the Astors and the
bloated bondholders is today an institution of the mixed economy.
In other words, it wasn't private property and freedom that brought down the
American Empire, but their opposite: an expanding government armed with a printing
press. Seen this way, the fix is simple: A return to Constitutional ideals
of limited government and sound money. Convincing a voting majority of this
will be a long, sometimes depressing process. But considering the alternative,
there's not much choice. So start honing your message; you're going to need
it.
BUY
GOLD AND SILVER ONLINE AT GOLDMONEY
|
John
Rubino
DollarCollapse.com
John Rubino is author of Clean Money: Picking Winners
in the Green Tech Boom (Wiley, December 2008), co-author, with GoldMoney's
James Turk, of The Collapse of the Dollar and How to Profit From It (Doubleday,
January 2008), and author of How to Profit from the Coming Real Estate
Bust (Rodale, 2003). After earning a Finance MBA from New York University,
he spent the 1980s on Wall Street, as a currency trader, equity analyst and
junk bond analyst. During the 1990s he was a featured columnist with TheStreet.com and
a frequent contributor to Individual Investor, Online Investor,
and Consumers Digest, among many other publications. He now writes
for CFA Magazine and edits DollarCollapse.com and GreenStockInvesting.com.
Copyright © 2006-2009 John Rubino
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|