|
While Elton John made us think of Norma Jean as a candle in the wind, the
financial markets in 2008 bring to mind a stick of lit dynamite in a hurricane.
Does an explosion loom before the unpredictable gusts finally dissipate? If
so, gold may be the only answer...
The Misnomer
The top misnomer being perpetuated by personalities like Jim Cramer and policy
makers like Henry Paulson today is that financial problems are lingering because
there is a 'crisis of confidence' in the marketplace. This misnomer continues
that confidence can only be restored via radical bailout actions by policy
makers. To note: we are not being told that Bear Stearns, the GSEs, and others
necessarily deserve to exist, only that they must be bailed out because there
existence is essential to the system (how confident are you in the 'system'
after hearing this?)
To begin with, the contention that unprecedented bailout efforts are required
to restore investor confidence is patently wrong. If a company is reliant upon
the credit markets for its day-to-day survival and/or can not function if its
reckless trading book no longer fetches top dollar, investors were wrong to
have confidence in this enterprise in the first place. In this regard confidence
restoration in the U.S. is akin to trying to bring back the grainy luster of
a table made press board.
Next, if 'confidence' in the marketplace can only be generated by making the
populace share the financial burden of bad financial choices it would be socialism,
not capitalism, which engenders the greatest confidence in financial markets.
How many bailout efforts does it take before the supposed confidence generating
payoff from socialistic activities no longer outweighs the growing burden on
the U.S. government and its citizens? Current trends suggest that we will eventually
find out.
In short, the real story is not of investors being more or less 'confident',
but of investors no longer behaving stupidly.
The Fallacy
The top fallacy making the rounds today is that inflation is the serious
threat. What few seem willing to acknowledge is that the rising inflationary
trend in 2008 has not been hurting the U.S. on a relative basis. Rather,
and after ending a multiyear stretch of sever underperformance in 2007 (compared
to other world markets), U.S. markets are holding up exceptionally well in
2008. Moreover, spiking inflation rates have helped take the once ominous threat
of emerging market dominance off the radar.
Another positive (?) inflation story is seen in the debasing of the U.S. dollar
(or the primary cause of today's 'inflation'). With trillions in U.S. assets
being destroyed, bank stocks crashing, and policy makers reacting frantically
to this deflation, dollar debasement is not only generating inflation
but also helping smooth an otherwise rocky path for the financial markets.
Given that this statement may seem controversial, consider the following: take
away the debasing of the dollar and the bailouts still to come do not get enacted,
future stimulus checks do not get printed, and wars do not get funded. In other
words, it is a massive contradiction to extol the benefits of a strong dollar
to combat inflation in one breath while calling for more unprecedented bailout
efforts with the next.
To make a potentially long story short, a weakening dollar has and can be
in the best interests of America if this weakness does not spark a 'crisis
of confidence' in the dollar, or (remembering the above misnomer) so long as
investors continue to behave stupidly.
The Lie
The biggest lie is that the Fed can always save the day. The reality is that
post-Volcker the Fed has done everything possible to avert periods of creative
destruction in the marketplace while at the same time doing little to promote
the longer-term health of the U.S. financial markets through regulatory prudence.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, this deadly dynamic is largely
the result of Alan Greenspan, a man who eulogized the supposed benefits of
self-regulation at every opportunity. Today's crisis is suggesting that the
self-regulated beast requires larger and larger bailouts in order to survive
and a super-regulator to tame it - thanks for nothing Sir Alan!
As the Fed slashes interest rates, accepts junk for treasuries, and applies
for the job of regulatory ringmaster, the recurring gravity of the situation
should be obvious: the Fed can only save the day by postponing necessary periods
of adjustment (i.e. today's 'deleveraging' is moving at a snails pace largely
because of Fed meddling!) It goes without saying that when the adjustment obstacles
become too large for even the Fed to handle the U.S. dollar and financial system
crumbles. Perhaps only then will the 'lie' in question be fully exposed.
MF&Ls Unite!
If the deflationary monsters can remain veiled behind advantageous amounts
of inflation, perhaps the U.S. bailouts can be effective over the short-term.
Perhaps also if the world feels that it has no choice but to continue along
the USD-hegemony-trail a little while longer, the system can avoid Armageddon.
Nevertheless, few trends tell us that longer-term a crisis of confidence in
the U.S. dollar can be avoided, and this suggests that one of the few safe
options for the investor remains gold.
But before arguing that gold is about to return to its safe haven throne,
remember that global policy makers, regulators, and money managers desperately
want to avoid this outcome. As for the average investor, so long as he or she
remains hooked on the misnomers, fallacies, and lies, they will continue running
down a paper dream while walking right by gold. To wit, amidst today's financial
blow-ups, foreclosures, and bank runs how many investors have been hoarding
gold because they fear holding fiat money? Not many.
In short, while gold is the answer if the explosion occurs, there is
reason to be optimistic that the paper chase can continue. Confidence in paper
money may indeed be shrinking as the inflation rate increases and the Fed tries
to throw its soothing cocoon over the financial world, but this confidence
- unlike the trillions in OTC derivatives and off-balance sheet schemes - is
nonetheless still observable.
|