|
It amazes me how many investors are now concerned about a deflationary spiral
occurring in commodity prices. They site oil prices that are slightly off all
time highs or a falling CRB index as their examples. While it is true many
commodities are off historic highs, it is hardly reasonable to project a continuation
of falling asset prices given the state of the banking sector and the consumer.
I know that sounds counterintuitive given the current state of the credit
crisis, but it is exactly that crisis and the Fed's response to it, which will
soon forge the path to inflation rates the likes of which have never before
been experienced in this country's history. The most important question investors
must ask themselves is how inflationary is the current 2% Fed Funds rate?
In a real economy, low interest rates are the product of a high savings rates.
When consumers defer consumption, banks find themselves flush with cash, they
then lower rates to attract consumers to take on new debt. Likewise, when banks
are short on funds they raise rates in order to preserve capital. This is the
natural flow of interest rate cycles. But under a fiat currency system, as
we made the mistake of embracing in 1971, all logic leaves the system. To give
you a historical perspective, look at the chart below of the Fed Funds rate
since 1958.

Source: TradersNarrative.com
We see from the above chart that the key overnight lending rate is at its
lowest point since the years immediately after 9/11. And before that emergency
rate was achieved, you have to go back to 1962 to find a commensurate level.
It is important to remember that 46 years ago we did not have a 100% fiat currency
system, so the 2% rate was a much more realistic and natural level of interest
to charge. Notice most importantly, the long term trend of falling interest
rates after Paul Volker took rates above 18% in the early 80's. His mission
was clear, to absorb the excess liquidity in the banking system and economy.
The next chart below shows our love affair with consumption and debt rather
than savings. Keep in mind the government seems to want to promote more of
this behavior at any cost. For example, this summer's stimulus checks were
unpaid for and temporary in nature. Since producers don't change long term
production plans, these temporary gimmicks only promote inflation and increase
deficits. In fact, recent official projections are that the deficit will reach
$490 billion in 2009.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
The key metric here is that total debt as a percentage of disposable income
was a mere 60% back in 1962. Today, we have debt levels at an all time high
of 135% of disposable income and growing at unprecedented rates. The Fed must
be very careful not to have rates rise too high and choke off the ability of
consumers to service their debt.
The last two charts below show the decline in the personal savings rate. The
first shows the decline from 1950-2005 and the second is a close up view of
the last 8 years. This illustrates just how artificial and inflationary a 2%
Fed Funds rate is.

Source: US Department of Commerce

Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
According to the National Income Product Accounts (NIPA), we find that back
in the early 1960's consumers saved about 8% of their disposable income. During
the early 1970's it averaged about 9.5% and in the early 1980s it averaged
close to 10.5%. Today we save about zero % of our after tax income. The savings
trend of the American consumer is in a free fall yet we find that interest
rates have followed that downtrend lower!
These statistics hammer home the point of how unrealistically low a 2% funds
rate is today. It can only be achieved by massive injections of fiat money
printing from the Federal Reserve. Since consumers are mired in record debt
and are not adding to their savings, the Fed has been the sole provider of
banking liquidity.
We have seen this play before. After the bursting of the equity bubble in
2000, the economy entered a slowdown that was combated by the Fed with a 1%
Funds rate. A short and shallow recession ensued but was followed by the biggest
bubble in our history -- the real estate frenzy. While it is possible commodities
may experience a continued pullback after their record advance, I believe it
should be welcomed as an opportunity to purchase them at bargain prices. These
ersatz interest rates have always led to inflation and will continue to do
so to an even greater degree in the future.
Those that are in charge of our economy have come to the conclusion that the
only way out of the collapse of this latest asset bubble is to create another
one. This time however, the consumer is completely without any added savings.
Therefore, the ridiculously low rate of 2% is more inflationary than at any
time in our history. The Fed has come to believe that the economy cannot tolerate
a real interest rate because debt on the private and public level has become
intractable. Knowing this, can you really start believing in a 1930's style
deflation? Protect yourself by owning something the government can't devalue
by decree. Unless the government perfects alchemy, buy gold.
|