|
Civilian Unemployment Rate: 5.7% in July vs. 5.5% in June; cycle low
is 4.4% in March 2007
Payroll Employment: -51,000 in July vs. -51,000 in June, net gain of
26,000 jobs after revisions of payroll estimates for May and June.
Hourly earnings: +6 cents to $18.06, 3.4% yoy change vs. 3.4% yoy change
in June; cycle high is 4.28% yoy change in Dec. 2006.
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE JULY 2008 EMPLOYMENT REPORT

Household Survey - The civilian unemployment rate increased by two "ticks" to
5.7% in July. The cycle low unemployment rate was 4.4% (December 2006 and March
2007). The broadest measure of labor underutilization, which includes the officially
unemployed, those employed part-time but desiring full-time employment and
those who are willing and able to work but have given up hope of employment,
jumped four ticks in July to a level of 10.3% -- the highest level since September
2003 (see Chart 1). Speaking of part-time employment, the percentage of persons
employed part-time but seeking full-time employment rose to 3.9% of total household
employment in July. As Chart 2 shows, there has been a rapid increase in the
ratio in recent months, which is typical as the economy slips into recession.
Chart 1

Chart 2

Establishment Survey - Total nonfarm payrolls fell by 51,000 in July
- the seventh consecutive monthly decline. Private nonfarm payrolls
fell by 76,000 in July. Although revisions to May and June total payrolls
netted out to a plus 26,000 jobs, these revisions netted out to a minus 11,000
jobs in the private sector. There were job losses across a wide spectrum
of industries as evidenced by the July diffusion index falling a full point
to 41.2 - the lowest reading since August 2003 (see Chart 3).
Chart 3

In the past 12 months, private nonfarm payrolls have declined by a net 535,000.
In the past 12 months, the so-called birth/death adjustment has added a
net 853,000 jobs. If the birth/death adjustment is excluded, private nonfarm
payrolls declined by 1,388,000 in the 12 months ended July 2008 (see Chart
4). If the birth/death adjustment is inaccurately biasing upward private
nonfarm employment, then all of the other government economic statistics that
are derived from nonfarm payrolls also are inaccurately biased upward. Without
the birth/death adjustment, perhaps the U.S. economy might not look quite as "resilient" as
it allegedly is thought to be by The Wall Street Journal and its op-ed
contributors.
Chart 4

Production is a function of the number of workers, the hours these workers
work and the productivity of these workers. The monthly employment report gives
us two of these three variables - number of workers and hours worked by them.
The combination of these two variables is called the index of aggregate weekly
hours of production. In a less politically-correct time, this index was referred
to man-hours of production. As shown in Chart 5, this index is down 1.73% in
the 12 months ended July. I do not see any other time since the mid 1960s when
the year-over-year change in the index of aggregate hours has gone from a positive
reading to down minus 1.73% and the economy was not in a recession (the shaded
areas in Chart 5). Perhaps things are different this time, but I would bet
Ben Stein's money that they are not different.
Chart 5

Folks were probably feverishly checking their mailboxes for Treasury rebate
checks in July because their paychecks were light. The product of private nonfarm
payrolls and average weekly earnings dropped 0.03% in July after increasing
0.22% in June. This augurs for a weak reading in the wage and salary component
of the July personal income data. On a year-over-year basis, growth in this
proxy for wages and salaries is up 1.18% in July (see Chart 6). What was the
year-over-year change in the CPI in June? 5.02%. No wonder retailers are shuttering
stores.
Chart 6

Conclusion - After the November elections, the National Bureau of Economic
Research will tell us what we and the Fed already know - the U.S. economy currently
is in a recession. Industrial commodity prices appear to have peaked, which
will begin to moderate the trend in headline U.S. inflation in a couple of
months. Businesses have little pricing power at the consumer level. There is
no evidence of a wage-price spiral. The inflation-expectations' anchor does
not appear to be dragging. The dollar appears to have stabilized, in large
part because of economic growth in the rest of the world appears to be slowing
significantly. Losses continue to mount on the books of financial institutions,
which will inhibit credit creation. Is the Fed going to raise its funds rate
target over the remainder of 2008? Not bloody likely!
|