|
Recent price action in the foreign exchange market in our estimation is a
function of a short-term rebalancing in expectations of global growth and demand
for commodities. When combined with the pause in the rate hike campaign at
the European Central Bank and growing uncertainty regarding the prospects for
economic growth in the United States dollar bulls that have been lurking in
the shadows for the past several years have re-emerged with gusto over the
past two weeks. Although, the late summer rally in the dollar that has seen
its value increase roughly 8% against the Euro, the case for a sustainable
reversal in the fortunes of the greenback is neither persuasive nor compelling.
The trend in the value of the dollar since mid summer of 2002 has been downward.
The accommodative monetary policy at the Fed and benign neglect of the greenback
of the Bush administration has been the primary culprits behind the debasing
of the dollar. Yet, the rapid decline in the value of the US currency over
the past year has been driven just as equally due to lingering problems in
the financial system and what at best can be described as a sluggish economy.
The economy in the second quarter of 2008 has reached the middle apex in our "W" growth
scenario, with the revisions to overall output currently poised to see growth
at or above 2.5%. Yet, once one looks out over the next few quarters there
is very little to support growth. Our estimate of personal consumption in the
second half of the year will do well to see any positive growth whatsoever.
External demand, which has been the major source of output over the first half
of the year looks to moderate and the fiscal stimulus has already begun to
fade.
After long hard slog in the markets over the past year, market actors deserve
a healthy bout of sunny optimism and a temporary era of good feelings during
the waning days of a the light summer trading season. Perhaps, that is not
cause for a dismissal of fundamentals. A consumer on the ropes, the expected
decline in demand from abroad, and more trouble from the financial sector,
which we expect to be the overarching conditions that will define the next
few quarters, are not conducive to dollar strength. We are a little uncertain
how softening demand abroad for US goods and services, which will kick out
the remaining pillar of support for the domestic economy, is a dollar positive
event. As long as these conditions continue to provide a framework for the
domestic economy the medium to long term prospects for the dollar will remain
weak at best.
So, if the troubles that lie at the heart of the US economy will continue
to persist why the sudden outbreak of optimism on the dollar?
First, the moderation of aggregate demand in the Euro zone and in Japan has
buoyed the spirits of market actors that the cost of commodities in general
and oil in particular have seen their peak. The sharp increase in the price
of oil was accompanied by a precipitous decline in the value of the dollar.
Hence, once cracks in the growth prospects abroad begin to appear, traders
took this as a cure to begin dumping Euros, Yen and British pounds for US dollars.
Second, after hiding in witness protection programs for the better part of
the past decade, the perma-dollar bulls have reappeared on the scene with a
vengeance. The transitory shift in the global monetary bias from that of inflation
to that organized around growth among the major central banks have produced
claims that the six-year trend down in the value of the dollar has ended and
that a new day has dawned in the forex markets: one of dollar supremacy.
A systematic examination of both the macroeconomic environment and the rolling
crises in the domestic system of finance tells a very different tale. Regardless
of transitory changes in the expectations of market players, the global tectonic
plates have shifted. Even with the current account deficit having fallen to
-5.30%, the international economy still faces a global imbalance between US
savings and international consumption that will take years to correct. Given
that the it will be at best a decade or more until demand from emerging markets
can facilitate a rebalancing of the global economy, the primary mechanism through
which that phenomenon will occur will be through a decline in the value of
the dollar.
Claims that the prices of commodities have reached their peak are questionable
at best. There has been a profound structural shift in the composition of demand
for basic commodities and energy. The price of oil has seen a temporary correction,
but the economic conditions are still in place on an international basis, even
with a modest reduction in the rate of Chinese growth to just below 10.0% to
maintain commodity prices at elevated or higher levels for some time to come.
The shift in overall demand for goods and services by emerging market countries
is a permanent feature of the international economy that does not support claims
a decisive long-term change in the direction of the dollar.
A simple look at the breakout of sunshine in the markets bears witness to
what is occurring. The negative narrative in the international economy is located
in Japan and the EU. Neither have been exactly, the star players in the global
economy over the past decade. The real story in the global economy has been
China, India, Brazil and the remainder of the emerging world that last I looked
was responsible for over 47.55% of global growth according to the IMF. China
and India alone, based on the revised purchasing power parity data was responsible
for a combined 15.50% of total growth in 2007. These countries will not see
economic contraction, but rather slightly modest rates of growth. This does
not support the type of a fall in the cost of commodities that too many market
analysts and financial media commentators have been foreshadowing recently.
The problems in domestic system of finance are on the road to reaching their
dénouement. But, they are far from over. There are at least two major
banks still limping along and subject to further financial pressure due to
the rate of defaults in the mortgage market, not to mention the 300 smaller
banks that our friends at the Royal Bank of Canada believe will be declared
insolvent over the coming year.
In the span of just under three weeks Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac saw more
than 60% of their market capitalization evaporate. It was only the joint intervention
of the Fed and the Treasury that prevented a meltdown. At this juncture our
discussion with market players does not support the idea that the market is
ready or willing to support the twin GSE's should they seek capital through
the floating of equities. The possibility that the market may choose to reject
funding of Freddie Mac in particular may be the next big financial event and
could require the Fed to design and implement other unorthodox programs to
meet the liquidity needs of the twin GSE's. Whether the Fed intervenes comprehensively
or the Congress essentially writes a blank check to fund its own mistakes,
it would be a profoundly dollar negative event, not to mention inflationary.
In our estimation, the recent moves it the foreign exchange markets represent
a transitory shift in expectations among market players of global economic
output and the price of oil. The volatility in the markets over the past few
weeks, however, does not alter the long-term prospects for the dollar. The
fragility of the financial system and the now clear difficulties ahead for
the domestic economy does not provide the environment in which the Fed will
be raising rates anytime soon. In fact, chatter on Wall Street has turned to
considering the possibility of rate cuts at the end of the year or early next
year. At the publishing deadline of this article, the options market is pricing
in a 27.7% probability of a reduction in the Federal Funds rate to 1.75% at
the December 16 meeting. While, because of our deep philosophical preference
for sound money, we would be less than enthusiastic about such a move, it cannot
be entirely discounted. Nor are we changing our Fed call to expect that it
will. But, we would not be surprised if the economic and political conditions
between now and the December meeting have changed in such a material way that
market expectations will have moved just as sharply in the direction of further
dovish action out of the Fed and a resumption of weakness in the dollar.
|