|
In recent posts I have taken a look at various conspiracy theories on the
rise of the dollar, the shortage of silver, and the manipulation of gold. Here
is a synopsis. (Warning, some of these are very lengthy)
I discussed US dollar manipulation claims in
In The
Great Gold, Silver Conspiracy Explained I took a look at many manipulation
claims in the gold and silver market, notably the COT report, large short
activity, trader concentration, and other so called "Smoking Guns".
In Jon
Nadler, Senior Analyst Kitco, Chimes In On The Precious Metals Conspiracy I
noted that one conspiracy theory about gold lease rates that blew sky high
when the alleged manipulation was actually a bad data feed on lease rates.
Occam's Razor
I am a big fan of Occam's
Razor which states "All other things being equal, the simplest solution
is the best." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal
in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces
the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities.
Competing Theories
Theory 1: The US government, foreign governments, central banks, various broker-dealers,
and a consortium of 10 large US banks are all acting together in some massive
conspiracy to suppress the price of precious metals for 15 years running, and
not a single insider has stepped up to expose the fraud even though housing
fraud stories from insiders are being disclosed at a rapid pace, and government,
CIA, and other intelligence leaks have been running rampant throughout that
entire timeframe.
Theory 2: There was huge selling by over-leveraged hedge funds in response
to fundamental changes in regards to the US dollar vs. the Euro.
Silver Monthly Chart

Simple logic would dictate that nothing ever goes straight up or straight
down. There are always pullbacks in any bull market. Interestingly, one of
the arguments for manipulation was based on how fast silver fell compared to
the moving averages. On a monthly chart one can see that silver was miles above
the monthly moving averages and did no more than fall back to it.
Conspiracy Theory Psychology
This post is not about rebutting theory number one (it has been adequately
trounced already). Rather, this post about why someone might be inclined to
believe Theory #1 vs. Theory number 2 when simple logic and Occam's Razor would
suggest otherwise. Let's start with the question "Who benefits from conspiracy
theories?"
Who Benefits From Conspiracy Theories?
The answer is those promoting the conspiracy theory as well as the faithful
follows. In this case, those promoting the idea that gold or silver is never
over-priced and is therefore the best investment in the world no matter how
far or how fast the investment had run are the primary beneficiaries.
We saw the similar thinking in the dot-com bubble in 2000. Back then it was
called "The
Gorilla Game". No price was too high to be paid for a "gorilla".
Those fervently holding beliefs that no price is too high have a psychological
need to rationalize losses and/or explain pullbacks. No logical argument about
dollars, interest rates, or even consolidations can possibly be sufficient
to explain to a "true believer" how or why whatever it is he is promoting is
falling in price.
Disciples need to address the faithful flock whenever price action does not
go their way. The best way to achieve this is to scream manipulation as loud
as one can whenever anything goes wrong. This gives rise to various Plunge
Protection Team (PPT) theories where every tick of data is argued over. It
also spawns rationalizations such as theory number 1 above.
Anyone holding an alternate theory (no matter how rational) is shouted down,
sent nasty emails, publicly ridiculed and the like.
The faithful followers benefit as well. They listened to the disciples and
they want to know what is happening and why. They do not want to hear they
made a mistake or they chose the wrong person to follow, or they were over-leveraged.
Instead they want to hear they were right. This is particularly true for the
relatively new faithful such as those who bought silver at $20 when it's now
at $13.
The way to convince oneself that one is right is simple: Blame the boogeyman.
Doing so relieves all psychological pressure associated with admitting one
is simply wrong.
Conspiracy Theories Are Sexy
Also note that conspiracy theories are sexy. People like the mysterious. It
gives creative minds something to think about and discuss at parties. "I made
a mistake" is so boring compared to discussions of who and how and just what
is behind the PPT attempting to rally stocks and suppress the price of gold
and silver. One can discuss the latter for hours on end while the former is
over in 15 seconds to 2 minutes flat.
Who needs the latter at a party? In this case a "party" can be a perpetual
discussion in cyberspace on the internet. Fun stuff indeed.
Are There Conspiracies And Manipulations?
Of course there are conspiracies and manipulations. I have listed many of
them.
Blatant Manipulations
- Term Auction Facility TAF
- Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PFCF)
- Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF)
- SEC rule changes options expiration week
- Selective enforcement of naked shorting rules
- Discount window changes in options expiration week
- Shotgun marriages arranged by the Fed
- The bailout of JPMorgan / Bear Stearns
If people want to rant about something they should be ranting about those.
However, support for the above actions is overwhelming because people view
the above as supportive of the stock market up. When it comes to conspiracy
theory psychology, no one sees the manipulation or conspiracy when the manipulation
is done on their behalf.
Planned Conspiracy To Prop Up The Dollar
No doubt conspiracy theorists will be all over this headline in the Guardian: US,
Europe, Japan planned March dollar rescue.
The United States, Europe and Japan had planned to intervene and rescue
a weak U.S. dollar in March, business newspaper Nikkei reported on Wednesday.
Officials from the U.S. Treasury Department, Japan's Finance Ministry, and
the European Central Bank reportedly drew up a currency contingency plan
to be undertaken over the March 15-16 weekend, Nikkei reported, citing sources
familiar with the situation. The monetary officials also agreed on a framework
for coordinating dollar-buying intervention, the report said.
No coordinated intervention took place, however, as the dollar began recovering
shortly after U.S. authorities brokered the buyout of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan
Chase & Co.
Is that a conspiracy? Of course it is. And I do not doubt it for a second.
But also notice how quickly it came to light! More importantly, had the plan
actually been executed people would have been convinced the government manipulated
the dollar higher. Ha!
We now can clearly see just how shortsighted that theory would have been.
The simple truth is that history now shows the dollar was ready to rally on
its own accord.
Such is the nature of why it sometimes appears that manipulations work. The
reality is manipulations never work, except in the extreme short term. They
only appear to work if the government manipulators are lucky enough to get
their timing exactly right, by accident, just as the event they wanted to cause
was going to happen anyway!
Following is another conspiracy story that came quickly into light.
Bear Stearns Case Study
Bear Stearns is an interesting vase study in Conspiracy Theory Psychology.
There are still all sorts of rumors still flying around about options manipulations,
naked shorting, and rumor mongering that did in Bear Stearns. It's ridiculous.
What did in Bear Stearns was massive over-leverage in highly illiquid real
estate securities that came to matter at exactly the wrong time.
Ironically there was a Bear Stearns conspiracy, but that conspiracy was not
to sink Bear Stearns as everyone believes, but rather to blatantly interfere
in the free markets to prop it up. The Fed, the Treasury, and various banks
were all openly involved in the conspiracy, and the Fed was willing to break
all sorts of rules to get a deal done.
If one looks close enough the shotgun marriage between Bear Stearns and JPMorhan,
the proper conclusion is that the marriage was arranged not to bail out Bear
Stearns but rather JPMorgan. The reason is that JPMorgan was the counterparty
of much of Bear Stearns' debt. JPMorgan was also a counterparty to credit default
swaps bet on the demise of the Bear.
Thus, Bear Stearns is an example of an outright conspiracy, with public perception
twisted a complete 180 degrees from reality! The Bears Stearns manipulation
happened in plain sight and people still got it wrong as to what happened and
why.
Indeed, most conspiracies and manipulations, including every item in the list
above, happen in broad daylight in full view of the public, and with public
support. They are not even viewed as conspiracies. On the other hand, the most
talked about conspiracies, notably the manipulation of gold and silver, are
nothing but self-serving hype.
In summation, when things are going well people have a psychological need
to take credit for their own ingeniousness. And when things are going poorly,
people have a psychological need to blame manipulators, conspiracies, naked
shorts, or in simple terms, the boogeyman.
So, people take credit for everything that goes right, regardless of how lucky
they might have been, while absolving themselves of blame for everything that
goes wrong, no matter how convoluted a theory it takes to do so.
Such is the nature of Conspiracy Theory Psychology.
|