|
Wall Street's recent mantra -- emblematic of its support for bailouts, especially
of financial firms -- is that Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:
FRE) are too big to fail. I've written
before about the potential problems associated with the G.S.E.s, but it
is now quite clear how much trouble these companies are in, so I thought it
was time to write a follow-up.
We have all heard the expression "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." At
no time has that statement been more apropos than with the creation of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae was created in 1938 as part of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt's New Deal, while Freddie Mac got its start in 1968. Like most government
sponsored programs, the idea sounded ok to most people. The concept was to
help expand home ownership by facilitating bank securitization, i.e. offering
government-backed insurance to bond holders in the case of a principal or interest
default. The business of the Fannie Mae later expanded to raising funds with
an implicit government backing, and hence lower interest rate, to purchase
mortgages outright and hold them as an investment.
So far so good, right? I mean, shouldn't the public sector strive to put as
many people in the role of home ownership as they can? Wrong! That's where
I find myself wondering how the Republicans have gone so far astray from embracing
capitalism. I don't expect Democrats to rail against a program that they themselves
enacted but why we have Hank Paulson, George Bush and Ben Bernanke doing back
flips to keep these institutions alive is beyond me. Those republicans, folks
who are supposed to espouse free market concepts, should be asking why the
government was meddling in the mortgage business to begin with.
This administration doesn't seem daunted at the fact that FNM and FRE have
reported a loss of nearly $15 billion in the last 12 months alone. Instead,
it finds itself in lock step with Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) who wishes
to expand G.S.E. powers in order to rescue the real estate market. In
my view we have already crossed the Rubicon in regard to the G.S.E.'s. These
monsters now are responsible for 80% of all new mortgages created in 2008 and
own or guarantee a total of 42% of the $12 trillion dollar mortgages outstanding.
The time to shut down the expansion of the G.S.E.s' is now. We may already
have reached the point where the entire real estate market and consequently
the economy are beholden to the government's continued involvement in the mortgage
market. Their role now should be to allow FNM & FRE to exist only to the
point that they can pay off existing debt holders while making sure they cease
writing new business.
When government decides to meddle with free markets, imbalances occur which
causes capital to be deployed in ways that are economically unviable and unsustainable.
A continuation of such behavior--especially to the degree that FNM & FRE
have reached--can lead to massive increases in inflation and a painful economic
unwinding.
We Americans have come to believe that suffering the consequences of our loose
lending and monetary policies can be avoided by escalating those same practices,
but we cannot succeed in reconciling an economic imbalance by fostering its
continuation. The truth is we have allowed these G.S.E.s' to become too big
to survive and our government must seek to eliminate them rather than continue
to pursue the idea that through these entities, politicians can effectively
divine what percentage of the population should own a home.
*Please check out my podcast, The
Mid-Week Reality Check
|