|
Once again, real estate market watchers have pounced on a shred of seemingly
positive news to proclaim that the long sought "bottom" is in sight. The routine
is becoming extremely stale, but somehow the media never seems to tire of it.
This time the "good" news was that the percentage declines in national home
prices (according to Case Shiller) in July where not as large as they were
in June. Although the report contained many other negative data points, including
increased inventories and a spike in foreclosure sales, it was the slowing
declines that got spotlight. Talk about grasping at straws. The truth is that
real estate has been grossly overvalued for years, and the adjustment process
back to realistic pricing has only just begun. The problem is few among us
seem to appreciate the magnitude of this adjustment and its implication for
an economy dependant on inflated assets values.
By most accounts, the decade long housing boom began in 1996 and finally went
poof in mid-2006. In January 1996, the Case Shiller 10 city composite home
price index stood at 76. By June 2006 it had tripled to 226, by far the largest
increase in U.S. history. Since then, the index has pulled back by 20% to 180.
For those who believed that home prices could never retreat nationally, this
20% correction is more than enough. In reality, it's just the down payment.
When real estate prices were expected to rise in perpetuity, the price of
a house had two components, one representing shelter and the other investment.
The shelter component was the actual utility and desirability of the house
and the investment component was the expected future appreciation. My guess
is that at the peak of the real estate mania, a $500,000 house might have been
comprised of $250,000 for the shelter component and $250,000 for the investment
component.
In effect, the appreciation potential, and the ability of the homeowner to
tap into it though refinancing and home equity loans, offset the real costs
of home ownership, such as mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and maintenance.
So the main reason a buyer would commit to a mortgage that would soak up 50%
of his disposable income was that he expected to recover most of that outlay
through future appreciation. Absent the expectation of that windfall, buyers
would not have been willing to pay such staggering prices for houses or commit
to burdensome mortgage payments.
Lenders were caught in the same delusion. Since they too believed prices could
only rise, lending standards were thrown out the window. If the collateral
(the house) were to always rise in value, what difference would it make if
the buyer made the payments? In effect, instead of relying on the borrower's
ability to pay to mitigate its risk, lenders merely relied on the house's ability
to appreciate.
However, now that real estate prices are falling, lenders are beginning to
rely solely on the borrower's ability to pay. As this trend continues, lending
standards will tighten and mortgages will be brought back into line with the
incomes of borrowers. In addition, down payments will be larger to reflect
the greater likelihood of losses should loans end up in foreclosure. When prices
were rising the foreclosure risk was negligible. However, now that foreclosures
are soaring and recovery rates are less than 50 cents on the dollar, those
risks are enormous.
So with falling real estate prices, mortgages are much less appealing to both
borrowers and lenders. The only solution is for home prices to fall to where
they are cheap enough for buyers to afford the mortgage payments (both interest
and principal) without relying on appreciation, teaser rates, or negative amortization,
and save enough for a down payment that would protect a lender in the event
of default. In addition, the collapse of the mortgage securitization market
means houses must be cheap enough for our limited pool of domestic savings
to supply the funding, as we will likely lose access to much of the foreign
funding that fueled the bubble.
Of course we need to be honest about the winners and losers of this credit
crunch. Just because mortgage money becomes scarce and lending standards tighten
does not mean people will not be able to buy houses --it simply means they
will pay a lot less for them and that fewer new houses will be built. Therefore
it is sellers, builders and those holding or insuring existing mortgages who
lose, while buyers win big. That is because despite higher interest rates and
larger down payments, they end up borrowing a lot less money. In the end they
will become true homeowners rather than indentured servants. If home ownership
is truly is the American dream that so many realtors profess, then the ongoing
collapse in home prices will be a dream come true.
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read
Peter Schiff's book "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic
Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and
preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best way
to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download our free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to our free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|
Peter Schiff C.E.O. and Chief Global
Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
Mr.
Schiff is one of the few non-biased investment advisors (not committed solely
to the short side of the market) to have correctly called the current bear
market before it began and to have positioned his clients accordingly. As a
result of his accurate forecasts on the U.S. stock market, commodities, gold
and the dollar, he is becoming increasingly more renowned. He has been quoted
in many of the nations leading newspapers, including The Wall Street Journal,
Barron's, Investor's Business Daily, The Financial Times, The New York Times,
The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Dallas
Morning News, The Miami Herald, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
The Arizona Republic, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Christian Science
Monitor, and has appeared on CNBC, CNNfn., and Bloomberg. In addition,
his views are frequently quoted locally in the Orange County Register.
Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant
with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and
accounting from U.C. Berkley in 1987. A financial professional for seventeen
years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since
January 2000. An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing,
he is a highly recommended broker by many of the nation's financial newsletters
and advisory services.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Euro Pacific
Capital, Inc.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|