|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
7th September, 2008.
In late 2002, when deflation fears were running rampant through the financial
markets, a little known Fed governor by the name of Ben Bernanke thrust himself
into the glare of publicity by giving a speech in
which he explained what the Fed could do to ensure that deflation didn't happen
in the US. Like most people, when Bernanke talks about deflation he is referring
to falling prices; that is, he is talking about one of the effects of deflation
as opposed to actual deflation (money supply contraction). His speech, therefore,
discussed the actions that could -- and probably would -- be taken by the Fed
and the US government to prevent a sustained fall in the general price level.
During this speech he referred to the Fed's unlimited ability to create new
dollars* and to Milton Friedman's famous quip about the government dropping
money from helicopters. As a result of this speech he came to be known as "Helicopter
Ben" and to be viewed by government policy-makers as a likely candidate to
succeed Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Fed.
When the problems in the world of sub-prime mortgage debt threatened to evolve
into a broad-based financial crisis in August of 2007, the Fed, now with Bernanke
at the helm, quickly began slashing the price paid by banks for short-term
credit. The way the Bernanke-led Fed initially reacted to the crisis lent support
to the existing perception that when 'push came to shove' "Helicopter Ben" would
live up to his moniker, even if it meant trashing the US dollar. The markets
therefore began to anticipate monetary profligacy on a grand scale, accordingly
pushing the foreign exchange value of the US$ downward and the prices of most
commodities upward. However, what we now know is that this anticipation was
off the mark, or at least premature.
Perhaps sensitive to his nickname, Bernanke did not flood the economy with
new money. Instead, he attempted to shore up the banking system's collective
balance sheet in ways that did not involve net additions to the money supply.
As evidenced by the Fed's
weekly H.4.1 Report, there has been a net increase of only $37B in reserve
bank credit during the most recent 12-month period (the 12 months ending 5th
September 2008). This amounts to a gain of about 4.3%, which is similar to
the year-over-year percentage increase in True
Money Supply.
However, the modest $37B year-over-year increase in reserve bank credit masks
dramatic activity beneath the surface. The Fed has, for instance, provided
the banking industry with an additional $150B of money via a scheme called
the "Term Auction Facility" (TAF). Also, under another scheme called the "Term
Securities Lending Facility" (TSLF) it has helped banks and other financial
corporations by offering pristine Treasury securities in exchange for the private
corporations' toxic waste (illiquid securities of indeterminable value). All
told the Fed has, in effect, provided $337B of assistance to the financial
establishment over the past year via the TAF, the TSLF, and a few other methods,
but has "sterilised" this assistance by disposing of about $300B of its own
Treasury securities, leaving a net change in reserve bank credit of only $37B
and avoiding a sharp increase in the money supply. To paraphrase Edmund
Blackadder, it was a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call
it a weasel.
Understand, though, that the Fed's ability to continue along its current path
will be restricted by the fact that its holdings of US Treasuries have already
dwindled from $780B to $480B. The Fed will almost certainly want to retain
at least a few hundred billion dollars of Treasuries on its balance sheet,
so if the financial sector requires additional large-scale assistance in the
future then it is reasonable to assume that the Fed will be forced to resort
to methods that involve creating a lot of new money 'out of thin air'. Bernanke
and Co. appear to be making a high-risk bet that the situation is now under
control and that such assistance will NOT be required.
It's very unlikely, in our opinion, that the efforts made to date by the Fed
to shore up the financial system will be the end of it. In any case, aside
from any additional aid it may or may not provide to banks the Fed will be
intimately involved in rescue operations cobbled together by the US Treasury,
beginning with the takeovers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A realistic appraisal
of the balance sheets of Fannie and Freddie would probably reveal that the
combined liabilities of these companies are hundreds of billions of dollars
greater than their combined assets, and since the government doesn't have any
spare money of its own (the government is already heavily in debt and running
a huge deficit) it will have to borrow the money needed to fill this liability-asset
gap. In all likelihood, borrowing the money will entail issuing bonds to the
Fed in exchange for newly created dollars.
*Here is the actual quote: "U.S. dollars have value only to the extent
that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology,
called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows
it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By
increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly
threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a
dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the
prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a
paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending
and hence positive inflation."
We aren't offering a free trial subscription at this time, but
free samples of our work (excerpts from our regular commentaries) can be viewed
at: http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/freesamples.html.
|