|
An Occasional Letter From The Collection Agency
It is time for a short update to the series of artices that started with The
Future Actions of The Federal Reserve And US Govt Are Known
Many people have been wondering what the cost of all this intervention may
be. I firmly believe that Bernanke, Paulson and the US Government are following
the ideas laid out in Eggertsson's work "An interpretation of The Deflation
Bias and Committing to Being Irresponsible".
The following is from the work that Eggertsson did
and I interpreted. It shows that the plan to buy assets was long in place before
the current problems. One of those credited in the paperby Eggertsson is Ben
Bernanke:

What Eggertsson means is if tax cuts are so large as to cut govt spending
by 10% (tax breaks forever?) then to keep an inflationary bias as a credible
outcome (keep inflation expectations in the mind of Institutions, Business
and Joe Public) would require the use of a sum equivalent to 70% of US GDP
to buy "real assets".
Or, as I said in April:
-
"If Bernanke and Co keep with the blueprint (it would be difficult to
see how they could deviate now without destroying carefully implanted expectations)
we can expect to see continuous and expanding intervention in what was
previously thought to be off limit areas.
Treasury bond issuance should rise and does not have to have a defining
limit. Tax rebates will continue and grow, expanding beyond traditional
areas. Use of current GSEs to expand government debt will be encouraged
and may well lead to the formation of "Super GSE's" that could take on
second lien loans on property, for example.
The Fed will expand its facilities, including more market participants
and widening the range of assets that can be used, including stocks. The
facilities will become permanent but will be allowed to run down in use
as circumstances dictate. It will be imperative to remove any stigma associated
with the use of such facilities, possibly by converting the facilities
to a type of GSE, or more likely, a Fed Sponsored Enterprise.
Concerted and possibly international intervention in Forex markets should
be given a high level of probability. This will allow a slow and orderly
re-pricing lower of the dollar and a continued bias toward inflation."
In that light remarks such as these now make sense:
-
Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke signaled
that the government should buy devalued assets at above-market values to
make its proposed $700 billion rescue package most effective in combating
the financial crisis.
"Accounting rules require banks to value many assets at something close
to a very low fire-sale price rather than the hold-to-maturity price," Bernanke
said in testimony to the Senate Banking Committee today.
"If the Treasury bids for and then buys assets at a price close to the
hold-to-maturity price, there will be substantial benefits."
and this:
- Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said
the U.S. economy will shrink if markets don't begin functioning normally,
joining Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in urging skeptical lawmakers to
quickly pass a $700 billion rescue for financial institutions.
"I believe if the credit markets are not functioning, that jobs will be
lost, the unemployment rate will rise, more houses will be foreclosed upon,
GDP will contract, that the economy will just not be able to recover,"
Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee today. "My interest is solely
for the strength and recovery of the U.S. economy."
The last line is a white lie. His sole interest is to avoid deflation, at
all costs.
So, what are the possible ranges of increase in deficit spending/asset buying
that may be required?

Read it and weep oh humble taxpayer, the benefit goes once again to the Bankers
and the corrupt financial system. You have just had your money used to "buy
high".
|
Mick P (Collection Agency)
About
Collection Agency
An Occasional Letter From The Collection Agency In association with Live
Charts UK.
For some years now I have written an ongoing letter, using macro-economics,
to try and peer into the economic future 6 to 18 months ahead. The letter was
posted on a financial bulletin board to allow others discuss its topic.The
letter contains no recommendations to buy or sell, indeed I leave that to all
the other letters out there and to the readers own judgement. The letter is
designed to make us all think about what may be coming, what macro trends are
occurring and how that will affect future trends and how those trends will
filter down to everyday life and help spot weak or strong areas to focus on
for trading or investing.
To contact Michael or discuss the letters topic E Mail mickp@livecharts.co.uk.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Mick P
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|