|
"...Seven-hundred billion here, $560 billion there, and pretty soon you're
talking deposit-bank warfare in the battle to recapitalize financial firms..."
WELL, IT SURE BEATS trying to secure an inter-bank loan or raising
cash from the stock market right now.
"After one of the worst days of trading on the Irish stock market, Ireland's
Government granted a sweeping unlimited guarantee on all bank deposits at its
six main banks for the next two years," reports The Times here in London.
"Brian Lenihan, Ireland's finance minister, said he had taken the unprecedented
action, which starts immediately, to maintain financial stability after Irish
banks' shares collapsed."
Think of this €400 billion insurance ($560bn) as a "competitive re-capitalization",
more akin than you might guess to those "competitive devaluations" that swept
the world when global finance last suffered a Great
Depression during the early 1930s.
Back then, national governments fought to squash the exchange-rate value of
their own citizen's money, bidding to grab export share and revive their home
manufacturing.
Today, and not quite in contrast, national governments are fighting to squish
the risk of collapse amongst their domestic savings and loans - the industry
that now matters most - by pumping money into local banks and guaranteeing
the security of cash savers.
The competitive bit? It comes in the cross-border flows that tax-funded bail-outs
invite.
"The Irish pledge to underwrite the country's banking system triggered a flood
of cash from British businesses to Irish banks," a senior Irish stockbroker
told The Irish Times in Dublin on Wednesday.
"A spokeswoman for the [UK] Post Office - where savings products are backed
by the Bank of Ireland - said there had been an increase in customers since
the Irish government's announcement" that it now guarantees all €400 billion
($560bn) of Ireland's bank deposits, reports the BBC.
Smart move, you'll agree. Monday saw the Irish Stock Exchange drop a massive
12.7% of its value in the market's worst ever one-session plunge. Since guaranteed
by the Taoiseach, the capital value of Anglo Irish Bank sank by almost one-half.
But then, in poured the savings...and up went the ISEQ, jumping by 8% the next
day.
"We just want the Irish government to look quite closely at the arrangements
they are putting in place to make sure they comply with EU competition law," said
a British government spokesman on Wednesday. He picked his words as carefully
as any man should before throwing stones inside his own glass-house.
The UK administration was the first to leap in and seize a failed bank when
this global crisis first hit in September last year. Saving Northern
Rock from itself, finance minister and Westminster-village idiot Alistair
Darling also guaranteed the cash savings of every man, woman and child in the
nation during what he laughably called the then "current instability in the
financial markets."
Not that the British nation has a great deal on deposit, of course. As BullionVault has
noted before, private-sector debts now outweigh the sum total of all cash,
bank savings and short-term near-money bonds in the UK economy (the M4 money
supply) by a massive 43%. All too literally, the UK
Cannot Pay What It Owes; there simply aren't enough pounds in the world,
neither as paper or photons.
But no matter; because in the new global race to bail out biggest and better,
government-backed banks provide just the security which frightened cash savers
need. Hence the headlines in London.
"Banks protest at Northern Rock's unfair advantage," reported the Evening
Standard in February. "Northern Rock rivals complain of unfair competition," said The
Times one month later. Now "Northern Rock cuts mortgage rates as rivals
go up," reports the Daily Mail. But why ever not? Cheap mortgages
have been government policy since the Tech Stock Crash on both sides of the
Anglo-Atlantic. Higher home-ownership rates became a target and tenet of
faith just as much in Whitehall as it did in the White House.
And with interbank lending once again ground to a halt - but with the full
weight of tax-payers' funds stood behind them - what's to stop Fannie, Freddie,
Northern Rock and all the other government-owned lenders from dominating their
markets...pumping out tax-funded loans at politically-friendly rates of interest?
Never mind the preferred stock owners in Asia and Arabia, now cursing their
part in the $200 billion cash raising somehow pulled off by the world's major
banks between July 2007 and June '08. Citigroup alone managed to raise $41.7bn
amid the frenzy of rights issues, so-called "hybrid" debt (it comes with equity-like
rights and thus losses), and sovereign wealth fund injections. Its stock lost
two-thirds of its value in the year to mid-summer.
But even after selling $130bn of its assets over that time, Lehmans Bros still
collapsed eight weeks later, taking a big chunk of the $8bn in fresh capital
it also raised from investors with it. Once bitten, and no doubt needing to
re-capitalize financial firms closer to home, all that Korean, Japanese and
petro-fund money will now steer clear of Western banking investments for as
long as it takes bankruptcy, bail-outs and state nationalization to stop trumping
risk capital.
In the absence of new financing, then, let's apply this week's Irish Sea cash-flows
to the very big picture. For isn't that movement of depositors' cash the best
Hank Paulson can hope for with his $700 billion bail-out of Wall Street...assuring
foreign capital that it's safe to return to the States, if only as cash-on-deposit
rather than equity, because Uncle Sam is underwriting the banks? Doesn't that
risk setting the whole world alight with Irish-style promises, all chasing
the same depositors' funds?
"Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number," as
former St.Louis Fed president William Poole said in a speech of late 2006. Calamity
Poole, however, was only thinking this moral hazard applied inside the
domestic United States.
"Every [US] company, financial or otherwise, knows that if it gets into trouble
it is at least worth a major effort to attempt to secure a bailout because
there is always a significant probability of success," he explained, as if
looking ahead (without seeing) to the $25bn bail-out of Chrysler, Ford and
GM.
The race to rescue, however, has spread far beyond Detroit. Competitive bail-outs
are now a globalized game, with tax-payers and savers both set to keep paying.
|