|
In the midst of highly unpopular bailouts of Wall Street, many justifications
have been given about why Washington feels the need to act. Some claim that
capitalism and the free market are to blame, but we have not had capitalism.
If you compare our financial capital to our aggregate debt, this would be obvious.
In the same way, we have not had a truly free market. The monetary manipulations
of the Federal Reserve, a complex tax code, the many "oversight" agencies and
their mountains of regulations show that we are far removed from a free market
economy.
Another unsatisfying argument is that certain entities have to be bailed out
because of their economic importance. Supposedly, some entities can be so big,
so important, that no matter what they do, citizens must perpetually sustain
them.
Even limited government has a basic duty to defend against force and fraud.
Some argue that force is somehow permissible just because the entity engaging
in it is "economically significant." But one could use this reasoning to prop
up slavery. It could be deemed unfortunate but economically beneficial, and
indeed these arguments have been used historically to deprive people of their
liberty. But slavery should never be tolerated regardless of any economic benefit,
just as systemic fraud should not be tolerated. Some banks on Wall Street should
fail. Fannie and Freddie should fail. They are perpetrating fraud against the
people. Yet, government insists on rewarding behavior which should instead
be investigated, prosecuted, and punished.
There has been much evidence of fraud at Fannie and Freddie, but when one
man, Franklin Raines, defrauded the organization out of millions of dollars
through illegal accounting tricks, and ends up agreeing to pay back just a
fraction, one could argue that it was well worth it to him. Fannie went on
to only get more deeply involved in subprime mortgages after this investigation.
Several organizations are suffering right now precisely because the free market
is trying to work and punish mismanagement, if only the government would get
out of the way and let it. Perhaps banks are not lending to each other because
they know that complicated accounting standards, created in part to defend
against confiscatory tax policy, enables false fiscal pictures to be presented,
which erodes trust. But this is not a time for the government to step in with
more burdensome and complicated regulations, or more foolish liquidity injections.
This is a time for some banks to fail, and remaining banks to deal honestly
and transparently once again. More regulations will only result in more lies.
Just as economies that turned away from slave labor had a transition period,
our economy would transition as well, but in the end, if we turned to honest,
sound money and a truly free market, we would end up with a more just society,
founded on truthfulness and decency, not subject to the violence of force or
the whims of fraudulent institutions. Unfortunately, it seems we are headed
into a new era of slavery, however, where all taxpayers will be forced to render
to the Fed and big banking interests the bulk of the fruits of their labor,
possibly through higher taxes but definitely through the eroding force of inflation.
|
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation
as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading
spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free
markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed
currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents
for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul
never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized
by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon,
Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Dr. Ron Paul
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|