|
With news this week that Congress is poised to consider a new stimulus package,
I am forced to again ask a question that seems silly in Washington: How will
we pay for this?
While a few Members of Congress have raised the issue, it certainly was not
the primary concern of the House Budget Committee when they interviewed Ben
Bernanke on Monday. And, when they did direct this question to the Chairman
of the Federal Reserve, his answer was the standard rhetoric about how Congress
needed to make tough choices. Needless to say, not many specifics were discussed.
One of the most liberal members of the House, Barney Frank, has at least volunteered
something of a suggestion: "We can let Iraq take care of itself." This, of
course, goes in the right direction, but hardly far enough.
We need to declare the facts and their obvious consequences. The deficit of
the United States is now spiraling out of control, and the recent bailout package
has only made it worse. Our crushing federal debt is one key reason behind
our current economic turbulence.
As Congress begins to consider the third "stimulus package" of the year, we
need to realize it is time to start setting priorities. Priority number one
should be cutting spending in foreign countries. This does not simply mean
Iraq, but everywhere.
The next stimulus package is likely to include money for infrastructure. While
these investments are, constitutionally speaking, supposed to be made by state
and local governments, it is not likely that Congress will suddenly begin to
pay heed to the document we are all sworn to uphold. Still, we need to acknowledge
the fact that the current Congress and Administration are rushing the nation
toward bankruptcy.
This being the case, we could hope they would at least come to their senses
regarding our debt and foreign spending sprees. Our nation's foreign-held debt
is at record highs and moving ever higher. Continuing to borrow money from
Red China and others in order to pay "dues" to the United Nations and run "Plan
Colombia" makes no sense at all.
Our whole carrot-and-stick approach to foreign policy makes no sense. The
US government simultaneously gives money to Israel, and to Egypt. We send AIDS
money to Africa while AIDS clinics in America shut down. "Millennium challenge" funding
goes to countries which enact "market based reforms" as we push our own country
further and further into a centrally planned economy.
Economic recovery will only come through financial prudence, savings and getting
back to producing things of value again. But it seems to be a foregone conclusion
that we are about to enact another government initiative to "stimulate the
economy." Instead, there should be some serious talk about cutting all of
these foreign giveaway programs. But, alas and again, we should not hold our
breath. Congress is still not close to being serious about ending its addiction
to debt and spending, and is again faced with the deadly temptation to attempt
to spend us out of a recession. We should not forget that in the 1930's those
types of efforts gave us the Great Depression.
|