|
The face of today's mainstream financial media has gone from meaningful analysis
and commentary to constant tub-thumping between undisciplined Main Streeters,
overambitious Wall Streeters, and ignorant bureaucrats. It has turned into
a showcase of the blame game, everyone looking for a scapegoat to shoulder
the iniquities of the masses.
Though these recent financial-market shenanigans are of historic proportion
and have scared stiff nearly every investor on the planet, folks seem to be
growing complacent. And it has been easy to fall into this trap and lose sight
of investment strategy considering the indiscriminant selloff of virtually
every asset class. Everything has been hit so hard that even the anti-commodity
CNBC commentators have toned down their bubble-bursting rhetoric.
But now more than ever investors need to step back and revisit their strategies.
The markets have changed, and for better or worse we need to know if what has
worked in the past will continue to work going forward. And what has worked
in the past is commodities.
Hands down, commodities have been the top-performing asset class of the 21st
century. This powerful
commodities bull was driven by strong global fundamentals that saw skyrocketing
demand far outpace supply. Based on simple economic principles this imbalance
prompted commodities prices to launch stratospheric.
Regardless of the mainstream financial media's continual disdain for this
commodities bull, which has run parallel with a
secular bear for their precious stock markets, legendary gains were won
for those prudent investors and speculators who saw the writing on the wall.
Now there is certainly a valid argument to be made that exuberant speculators
caused many commodities prices to reach overbought territories and perhaps
even launch into bubble-type parabolas. But there is no denying that it was
the fundamentals that provided a solid foundation for the run on commodities.
Well with the crumbling financial markets taking their toll on the global
economy and launching what is expected to be a recession of historic proportions,
is the commodities bull over? Over the course of the last several years the
financial media has proclaimed the end of the commodities bull on countless
occasions. And much to their chagrin they have been wrong every time.
But is it different this time? Is the commodities bull really over? In the
past it has been easy to defend this bull market using anecdotal evidence of
real-time hunger for scarce raw materials. But this time there seems to be
little defense for commodities. And over the last several months there has
been a massive selloff in the commodities realm. Nothing has been immune to
the carnage.
While the dust may not have fully settled yet, fundamental changes in the
global marketplace are already beginning to unfold. And I believe it is prudent
to catch our breath and see if and how these interim fundamentals are changing
the secular nature of the commodities bull. But first we need to assess the
damage. To place the commodities bull in strategic context I put together a
table that captures its essence.

Since there is no official date that marks the beginning of the commodities
bull, as individual commodities began their bulls at different times, for reference
sake I used a date that I believe marked the end of the secular
stock bull. March 24, 2000 was when the flagship S&P 500 (SPX) index
reached its apex, and this is as good a point as any to mark the beginning
of the commodities bull.
The first column shows the price of each component at the beginning of the
commodities bull. In the preceding 17 or so years that molded these starting
values the flow of capital poured into the stock markets and left commodities
with reckless abandon. After years of a grueling bear that ravaged the commodities
industry, many of these March 2000 prices neared historic lows.
But after years of neglect in which investment in commodities exploration
and infrastructure all but dried up, suppliers would get a rude awakening when
there was resurgence in demand. The supply side of the commodities trade was
unprepared for the rapid demand growth that was soon to come.
From these March 2000 lows, commodities prices would soar as suppliers scrambled
to meet demand as well as take advantage of the new higher prices. But unlike
a widget factory that can increase supply with the turn of a dial, it is much
more difficult to ramp up commodities production.
At the turn of the century much of the commodities supply chains consisted
of aging and depleting resources within shoddy and rundown infrastructures.
A lot of work needed to be done in order to materially increase the capacity
of natural resources production. But especially for those resources that are
finite, hidden in the bowels of the earth, fresh new operations would only
come about after intense exploration, discovery, and development. And this
process is neither quick, easy, nor cheap!
Petroleum and mineral production offer fine examples of this tedious process.
The first phase involves establishing the economic feasibility of a mineral
deposit or oilfield, which takes years of intense exploration. If a project
is actually revealed to be economically viable, only then do the directors
of the producing company hammer out the details and make the decision to develop
operations.
After a positive development decision the project owners must then procure
financing for what are usually sizeable capital expenditures. The development/construction
phase then takes several more years, and if all goes well the project will
eventually be ready for commercial production. Ultimately it can take between
5 to 10 years and hundreds of millions of dollars just to commission a medium-size
mining or drilling operation.
As a result of this slow response time on the supply side, supply growth was
nowhere near meeting demand growth. And when supply can't meet demand, the
only thing capable of quelling demand is rising prices. As you can see in the
second column, prices responded with sharp ascents.
These bull highs returned the massive gains we see in the third column. And
keep in mind these gains are measured from a common point of reference. Many
of these commodities launched into their respective bulls from prices that
were even lower than those in March 2000.
For example the HUI gold-stock index didn't achieve its low of 35.99 until
later in 2000, giving it a trough-to-peak gain of 1331%. Many of the base metals
didn't hit their lows until years later. From trough to peak aluminum, copper,
nickel, zinc, and lead had respective gains of 165%, 581%, 1124%, 537%, and
896%. And oil's low of $10.73 was actually achieved in late 1998, giving it
a trough-to-peak gain of 1259%.
Regardless of their exact lows, these bulls were secular in nature. And as
you can see in the fourth column most commodities achieved their interim tops
at some point in 2008. And with oil being the largest and most influential
commodity, when its bull ran out of steam in summer 2008 so marked the top
of the venerable
CCI.
As you can see in the next two columns the recent global selloff of anything
and everything has hit commodities hard. Prices are vastly lower than their
highs achieved not too long ago. And these price declines are massive. Many
of these commodities have seen their prices lopped in half, or more, in short
order.
Oil is off by a whopping 53% since its July high. Measured by global consumption
this translates into a staggering $6.5b swing to the downside in daily capital
flows in just three short months. Copper, which is the highest-profile base
metal, is down 49% off its July high. And the grains are also suffering, with
corn and wheat off 41% and 61% from their 2008 highs.
So with this across-the-board slaughter does it mean that the commodities
bull is over? I don't think so! And I know this stance is of extreme contrarian
nature right now but hear me out. The commodities bull is not over for one
simple reason, and this is Asia.
I understand that many folks are getting tired of the constant beating of
the Asian drums, but these drums have been loud for a reason. And while the
thumping sound may not be as audible in these chaotic markets, it is not going
away. Led by China, Asia's developing economies will continue to thrive for
decades to come.
One way to look at Asia's growth prospects is through the eyes of its massive
population. Using China as an example, we know that its government is hell-bent
on growing its economy to become the decisive world powerhouse. And as part
of this growth its people will prosper.
The 1.3b+ people in China and even the 2.7b+ people in the rest of Asia combine
for a massive consumer base that has never been party to past commodities bulls
or economic prosperity. The Western economies, US and Europe, have long been
the sole drivers of market cycles until now.
With an infrastructure build-out that is still in its early stages mixed with
wealth and discretionary capital in the hands of folks that long to live the
Western lifestyle, commodities consumption should continue to rise in the years
to come. Measured by per-capita commodities consumption the Westerners have
been through a growth cycle that has likely seen its peak. But in Asia per-capita
commodities consumption is expected to rapidly rise as people improve their
lifestyles.
And this per-capita commodities consumption growth should not be too affected
by the stock market travails. A lot of the funds pulling out of the Asian markets
are sovereign and speculative, and were held by a limited number of hands with
large positions. I don't expect these losses will impact the average Asian
citizen in the same way they will the average Westerner.
Now I'm not saying that we aren't experiencing a period of contraction on
the commodities front, even in Asia. A global recession will reach far and
wide. In fact we are likely in the midst of an extended cyclical bear on the
commodities front. But I don't believe this bearish cycle has the moxie to
put an end to the secular bull. And neither does China.
Just recently the Chinese government commented that while economic growth
will slow a bit during this turmoil, the unfavorable international factors
and even serious natural disasters at home won't change its core economic growth
strategy. China made it emphatically clear that its economic growth machine
has the ability to repel whatever external risks are thrown at it.
And when you consider that China hosts well over 50% of the world's construction,
that coal-fired power plants are going up at a rate of one per week, and that
oil demand is expected to increase by 50% in the next 10 or so years, it is
apparent that China has some clout in the global commodities markets.
But regardless of this China rhetoric, many still ask how I can possibly believe
that this commodities bull is still alive in the face of such rapidly declining
commodities prices. For many folks "correction" is an understatement. As you
are likely aware analysts of all walks of faith are using "crash" with impunity.
And depending on whose definition you go by some commodities prices may have
indeed experienced a crash from their tops.
Ultimately however you define the shellacking that commodities have endured,
I don't believe this activity is bull-ending. This extraordinary selling pressure
is likely a combination of commodities prices perhaps getting too high for
their own good mixed with extreme and unprecedented market fear.
Looking at the last column on this table we can see that even though commodities
prices have seemingly fallen off a cliff, most are still way above their lows.
And I included the SPX in this table to offer some perspective. If there is
any challenge to the ironclad reality of the secular bear in the general stock
markets and the secular bull in commodities this table ought to clear things
up.
Investors who've had their money in the SPX since 2000 have had a tumultuous
and unrewarding journey. A brutal 2000 to 2002 cyclical bear that shed 49%
was followed by an impressive 2003 to 2007 cyclical bull that doubled-down,
bringing investors just back to par. But when you throw inflation in the mix, flat
performance after 7+ years is devastating to one's portfolio.
After the SPX peaked nearly a year ago, which was only 2% higher than its
March 2000 high, it has spiraled down by 41%. Investors in commodities over
this 8-year span have fared much better. As you can see even after the commodities
carnage of late, the gains are excellent.
From March 2000 to current most commodities and the stocks involved in their
trade are still sporting impressive gains. The ride has certainly been wild,
and traders have had to befriend volatility, but it has been very rewarding
for those who got in early.
As for calling a bottom my inner contrarian tells me it is here now. I believe
commodities and commodities stocks are vastly oversold and represent incredible
bargains. But it is also prudent to consider how much farther the trepidation
that is driving these markets mixed with a broken financial system can drag
prices to the downside.
Right now we are going through a period where leveraged speculative positions
are being unwound and the economic landscape is being rebalanced. Commodities
demand has definitely slowed, but it has not disappeared. Unfortunately the
financial media is currently using the careless phrase "demand destruction" far
too loosely when describing the commodities markets.
In reality the only thing being destroyed is commodities prices. Demand is not being
destroyed. My business partner Adam Hamilton has an alternate view of this
demand-destruction paradox. In the 10/21/08 issue of our Zeal
Speculator weekly newsletter he wrote:
"...traders are acting as if a recession means demand Armageddon, but that
is silly and irrational. If a normal year is given a baseline of 100, a recession
with 2% economic shrinkage still comes in at 98. An unthinkable 5% annual decline
in US GDP is 95% of the normal baseline year. Oil demand will contract modestly
in a recession, but not implode totally. We Americans will still eagerly consume
vast quantities of raw materials."
"Similarly, Chinese and Indian demand aren't going to fall off a cliff either.
Growth may slow, but demand will still be immense from an absolute perspective.
China just reported that its Q3 GDP came in at 9.0% growth, which hammered
commodities. Yet this wasn't down from 30%, just 10.6% in Q1 and 10.1% in Q2.
Chinese demand for oil and most key commodities is still growing rapidly..."
Adam goes on to explain that even in slow economic times there is still a
lot of demand for raw materials. Recessions don't wipe out demand, they are slight reductions
in overall aggregate consumption levels. It is fear and panic that is driving
this massive commodities selloff. And these price levels are unsustainable
over the long run.
In fact, these depressed prices are likely to snowball into yet another severe
supply pinch. We are already seeing widespread production cuts not only in
the oil industry but the mining industry. Many operating mines cannot profitably
produce their metals at today's prices, causing production stoppages. And many
development projects are being put on hold not only due to these low commodities
prices but the dried-up credit markets and lack of investor interest in equity
offerings.
Shifting gears, while weakness may persist for a spell as most commodities
prices seek to stabilize and find their balances, especially the industrials,
the precious metals should really thrive in today's environment. In the table
above you can see that gold has not given up its ghost, and has retained most
of its gains.
This strength is a result of rock-solid and unchanging fundamentals. Gold's
commoditized nature is unique in that it acts as a safe haven and store of
wealth. And in these uncertain times when even cash is risky, gold offers investors
true value. The economic balance of gold is also unique compared to other commodities.
Gold mine production continues to
fall in the face of rising demand.
These are just a handful of gold's
stellar fundamentals. And this global financial crisis should be a great
boon to gold's desirability. When these gargantuan government bailouts start
to filter through the system the world will experience a huge inflationary
period as the printing presses are stressed to their limits. And this is
where the demand for gold will really flourish as investors diversify out
of the fiat mess.
Overall I believe the greater commodities bull market is not over. Throughout
history commodities bulls have run for an average
of about 17 years, and I have no reason to believe this one will be any
different. As you can see in the table above commodities have been the strongest
asset class over the last 8 years, and I believe they will continue to be the
strongest for at least the next 8 years.
At Zeal we are students of the markets and constantly seek to better understand
and trade them. We've been performing cutting-edge market analysis and research
since this commodities bull began in 2000 and have been using this knowledge
to execute high-potential trades in our acclaimed Zeal
Intelligence monthly newsletter.
We also put this research to work in the form of supplemental reports on
a variety of sectors in the commodities realm. Our most recent report profiles
the most promising commodities ETFs and ETNs, which are all dirt-cheap today.
To purchase this report and/or join our many subscribers who seek guidance,
experience, and fortitude in these wild markets, visit
Zeal today!
The bottom line is it is fundamentals that ultimately drive the secular nature
of any bull market. And the long-term prospects for commodities remain very
strong. China will continue to be the stalwart of the world's developing countries,
and it is these countries that have and will continue to drive this commodities
bull.
The interim growth trends may recede for a while, but they will not grind
to a halt. And we may even find that the chain reactions caused by today's
extreme fear will quickly pinch supply and cause an even sharper run on commodities
as soon as this recession runs its course. Investors who haven't given up on
the commodities bull should again be in line for legendary gains.
|