|
Editor's Note: This article has been excerpted from a free issue of Robert
Prechter's monthly market letter, The Elliott Wave Theorist.
The full 10-page market letter, Be
One of the Few The Government Hasn't Fooled, can be downloaded
free from Elliott Wave International.
"Who Will Benefit From The Housing Act?"
This question is an actual headline from a national daily paper. The real
answer is: mortgage lending corporations, developers, real estate agents, speculators
and politicians. The government is also pledging tax money to providers of "financial
counseling" and grants for speculators who want to "buy and renovate foreclosed
housing"; in other words, it will hand tax money to charlatans and unfunded
wheeler-dealers. But a far better headline would have been, "Whom Will the
Housing Act Hurt?" The answer to that question is: (1) prudent people, i.e.
savers, earners, renters and people who have waited to buy a house at a reasonable
price; and (2) innocent people, i.e. taxpayers.
Government action (unless it is aimed at destruction) always causes the opposite
of its stated effect. If taxpayers ultimately have to shoulder the burden for
all the bad mortgage debt, those who are on the edge of being able to make
their mortgage payments will be forced over the edge, causing more missed mortgage
payments and more foreclosures.
There is never any need for a law granting privilege except when the goal
is to reward the undeserving and to punish the innocent. If the goal were otherwise,
there would be no need for a statutory law, because the natural laws of economics,
when unencumbered, serve to reward the deserving and punish the imprudent and
the guilty. Populists loudly challenge this idea, but they are wrong.
I thought the Fed was created to "help manage the economy."
After a secret meeting on Jekyll Island (GA), Congress and a handful of bankers
created the Federal Reserve System for two purposes. The first one was to allow
the government to counterfeit money, thereby letting it steal value from savers
through inflation. The second was to allow bankers to make profits through
debt creation, also at the expense of savers. Any other claim is a smokescreen.
So shouldn't we blame the Fed for the country's financial problems?
That's like blaming the collapse of your house on the biggest termite. The
Fed is only one of the monsters that Congress has created. In the financial
realm, others include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, Sallie Mae, the
FDIC, the FHA, the FHLBs and the income tax. But there are also a hundred other
havoc-wreaking agencies of the federal government. Congress is to blame for
ruining America. The Fed is only one of the mechanisms it created along the
way. It's a big one, and it's fine to campaign against it, but to blame it
for everything is to give its creator a free pass.
This is an important distinction, because many people seem to think that abolishing
the Fed will cure America's money woes. They seem to think that once the Fed
is abolished, Congress will behave responsibly. One website even calls for
abolishing the Fed in favor of giving money-printing power directly to the
federal government! Abolishing the Fed is a worthy goal, but Congress will
work tirelessly to create one disastrous institution after another, because
that's what campaign donors pay for.
For more information on the government's role in the financial crisis, download
Robert Prechter's free 10-page market letter, Be
One of the Few the Government Hasn't Fooled.
|