|
As it stands now, the US Federal government is the only significant buy of
risky assets in this country. Not only is it the only buyer of these hyper-inflated
and hasteningly depreciated assets (read as wealth reducing), it is now trying
to force bubbled assets up in price. This is absolutely absurd. Who's in charge
up there. The housing market was on an unsustainable and destructive bubbliciously
unrealistic tear. The bubble popped, and prices are correcting. Let me say
it again - prices are CORRECTING. They are returning to where they should be,
the are not dropping from where they should have been.
With the very strong possibility of a US auto industry bankruptcy (pre-packaged
or not, somebody is going to get stiffed), combined with what will most likely
be a $70 billion plus bailout - don't believe that $25 billion number any more
than you can believe Treasury Secretary Paulson in public - this country is
going to be a little strapped for cash. We still have the commercial real estate
crash to deal with, the insurance industry will have their hands out, and the
municipalities are bleeding badly. For those not familiar with my stance on
Paulson, see "Is
Paulson to be trusted, or is this Bush Administration Shock and Awe, 2.0?", Reggie
Middleton asks, "Do you guys know who you're messin' with?", and "Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure redux" -
Yeah, I think the man "stretches the truth" to congress and the public every
now and then, but to give him a little credit, no more so than Bush, Rumsfeld
and those WMDs.
Take a cursory scan of Bloomberg.com's home page and you will see nothing
but good news to lighten your weekend:
• European
Stocks, U.S. Futures Drop as Metals Fall, Economy Concern Widens
• Payrolls
in U.S. Probably Fell by Most in 26 Years as Recession Deepened
• General
Motors Chief Says He'd Accept Strict Conditions on Federal Bailout
• Trichet
Under Pressure to Give Deflation Plan as Rates Get Closer to Zero
• Merrill
May Be Toughest Test for Bank of America's Serial Dealmaker Lewis
• Pimco
Sees Pound Bottom as BOE Cuts Rate to Lowest Level Since Churchill
• Kerviel
Loses Bid to Question SocGen Chairman Bouton in Trading Loss Probe
• India
Broadens Security Alert to Include Government Buildings, Refineries
• Cisco,
Dell Risk Losing Sales as Bankruptcies Flood Technology Gray Market
• Galaxy,
Olam Buy Back Debt as Collapse in Asia Bonds Drives Yields to 28%
• Murders
Rise in Obama's Backyard as Recession Crimps Chicago Police Hiring
• Canada
Economy Sheds 70,600 Jobs, Most Since 1982, on Manufacturing Slump
So, what happens when you try to artificially manipulate this correction,
through administrative or legislative means? You make a big, fat, hot mess
that is much worse than what you started with, that's what happens. See Paulson
Considering Plan to Revive Housing by Driving Down Mortgage Rates:
Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson is considering a new plan to reduce mortgage rates in another
bid to revive the U.S. housing market, a government official said.
The Treasury, which already has a program to buy mortgage- backed securities
issued by Fannie
Mae and Freddie
Mac, could step up those purchases to drive down interest rates on some
loans to 4.5 percent, the official said on condition of anonymity. The plan
is preliminary and could change. Now, I'm not an expert or anything, but wasn't
this the impetus of the calamity in the first place? There used to be this
urban myth circulating when I was in college. If you had a real bad hangover
from partying the night before, just throw down a couple of shots of over proof
rum and you will totally forget about the hangover the night before. It appears
as if Paulson is a believer. Don't get me wrong. I make my money from unwise
central banker decisions, worldwide (see "My
Investment Style"). If Paulson keeps it up, I might as well start test
driving that new convertible Maserati
Gran Turismo S. Since I am a humble man from working class roots, I'd be
quite satisfied with my Chrysler mini-van, in exchange for some fiscal prudence
and practical foresight from my government. Unfortunately, I don't think it
will happen, at least not in the short term and in the vein that I think is
most practical. Then again, what the hell do I know? I just called this malaise
with 100% accuracy from the very beginning (see performance).
If the followers of my blog think my performance has been impressive over
the last year and a half, just wait until this Global Macro Experiment really
starts to kick in. You ain't seen nuthin' yet! In an attempt
to avoid taking the proper medicine for the last two bubbles blown, the central
bankers around the globe are huffing and puffing, inhaling and exhaling (quite
hard, may I add) in a concerted attempt to blow the MOTHER OF ALL BUBBLES).
My team and I road the last bubble up, we're riding it down (and documenting
it meticulously in real time through this blog via 20 page research reports)
and trust me, we will take full advantage of the mess the central banker made
(is making, won't stop making). The revolution will not be televised. No need
to fret or worry. I will continue to manipulate this new media and medium to
blast the truth to all who want to, or wish to hear it.
Asset prices must be allowed to correct, and the insolvent must be allowed
to fail so the solvent can continue and investors can have confidence in the
market pricing mechanism. Thus far we have no investor confidence, and as for
the insolvents -well the walking dead are all over the place, and I'm talking
some pretty big bodies.
It is not as if asset prices are not going to fall anyway. You cannot legislate,
or administrate high risky prices in a market based economy (that is, if we
still have a market based economy - the socialism is creeping). Yes, the government
buys everything risky from everybody else, but what about the 2nd transaction?
In order for prices to maintain that level or rise higher, someone must make
a purchase at an equal or higher price. It ain't gonna happen for at least
a decade, and that may be optimistic.
The deliberations come as President-elect Barack Obama pledges fresh action
to help American homeowners, and follow a $600 billion initiative announced
by the Federal Reserve last week to buy mortgage debt. Mortgage applications
surged by a record last week and the average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan
dropped to 5.47 percent, the lowest level since June 2005, the Mortgage Bankers
Association said yesterday.
"Lower mortgage rates will allow households to fortify their balance sheets,
and we will likely see consumer spending come back a little quicker than it
would otherwise," said Mark Vitner, a senior economist at Wachovia Corp. in
Charlotte, North Carolina. At the same time, "it's not going to be an instant
panacea for what ails the economy," he said. Maybe, and maybe not. Lower money
rates also spur imprudent speculation when taken to the extreme, and this can
be considered extreme. Mortgage rates are ALREADY flirting with historical
lows, so I really don't think rates are the problem. Imprudent financial behavior
and low savings and real investment rates coupled with sparse real income is
the problem. Hey, instead of dropping rates to a 100 year low, let's keep them
at a 98 year low and try to spur employment and productivity. That way people
can actually pay their debt service and buy assets the old fashioned way, work
for it.
While lowering mortgage rates to 4.5 percent would allow most homeowners to
refinance into a cheaper loan, far fewer will actually qualify, said Rajiv
Setia and Nicholas
Strand at Barclays Capital in New York.
|