|
"...'What is economics?' an economics professor asks. 'Scarcity' comes
the school-children's answer..."
SO WE'RE LIVING through the end of something. Something important and
ugly. Everyone seems agreed on that.
But what is it...this big, slippery something, harder to nail down than twelve
tonnes of jelly?
"It's the end of an era in the global capitalist economy," says antediluvian
historian Eric Hobsbawm. Or the end of "the prevailing economic model" according
to London's left-leaning Guardian. Or rather, the end of "American capitalism" in
the Washington Post's words.
Just call it "the end of Wall Street" says Michael Lewis, author of Liar's
Poker. Better still, let's call it the end of "US domination" chips in
Russia's puppet-president, Dmitri Medvedev. Either way, the 50 states are
to blame - and with half-a-million Americans losing their job in one month,
it's "the end of the world as we know it" wails German weekly Spiegel.
So many nails, so much jelly! But seeing how what's really at stake - first
through its surfeit, now through its absence - is money and all that
flows from it, we can't resist pitching in our ha'penneth here at BullionVault.
Not because we believe we might have the answer, but because we should at least
bore you with our opinion. We are, after all, now caring for 12 tonnes of gold
on behalf of private investors worldwide, all seeking to defend their wealth.
That's as much as the central banks of Canada, Mexico and Ireland combined.
And yes, the last 18 months do indeed mark the end of an era; the op-ed columnists
have got that much right, living through their own end-of-times in the fast-fading
newspaper business. But the next year-and-a-half will only mark it still further,
we think. And given how government the world over is trying to revive the patient
with fresh gobfuls of money, his death may yet be made worse by stuffing cash
into his throat as he struggles for breath.
First, though, the story so far.
"What is economics?" asks a professor priming first-year university students. "Scarcity" comes
his own answer. "Resources are scarce, but human wants are unlimited," a school-children's
textbook goes on, clipping their dreams before they're out of short trousers.
If only we could all have everything we all wished for! But there's never
enough time, stuff or effort for that. And money was supposed to make vivid
this problem.
Above all other things, money is a claim on resources. My Dollar, your Euro...in
law they can't be refused when we use them to buy things. But just like the
resources cash buys, money also needs to be tightly supplied. Too much of the
stuff would force the price of things higher, as those limitless claims crashed
into still-limited nature. Either that, or the flood of unlimited claims would
imply we'd all got way more resources to use. And that would skew the picture
so badly, we'd risk using tomorrow's resources today...burning our way through
our children's fair share and smacking their legs with text-books bought for
a penny from the stacks of unsold, unwanted remainders.
Hence the trouble with gold - both when it really was money (c.3,000 B.C.
to A.D. 1933) and also today (scarcely one life-time later). Gold makes real
that scarcity the world faces each day. Limited in its supply, and useless
for pretty much everything else, gold-as-money works wonderfully well. Provided,
of course, that the fact of scarce resources is politically possible.
For those who owned the resources gold bought and sold, the metal's power
reached its zenith with the late-19th century Gold Standard - "the rule of
law applied to money" as James Grant of Grant's Interest Rate Observer once
noted. Under this law (both natural and legal), scarcity always won over demand,
ownership always beat credit. "The civilized world had a single money - gold
- of which the paper moneys of individual states represented fixed and timeless
sums," relays James Buchan in his history of money, resources and wants, Frozen
Desire. "Its chief effect was a slight but continuous depression in the
price of goods in money, thus accelerating the use of technique in manufacturing,
ruining farmers and other debtors and entrenching the lending class, the rentiers.
Gold became, in Keynes' phrase, 'part of the apparatus of conservatism'."
So lightly supplied, however, gold capped humanity's aims, foiling ambition
and curbing expansion to the limits of progress. If science, agricultural or
mineral yields and factory efficiency couldn't deliver fresh growth, then neither
would money. But what of the opposite problem? What if humanity's unlimited
wants ever got ahead of themselves, supplying tomorrow's desires with production
today?
"Even as a child, Ben Bernanke was intrigued by the Depression," wrote Greg
Ip, the Fed's inside man (or so rumor had it) at the Wall Street Journal back
in 2007. "His maternal grandmother described life as a young mother during
the 1930s...[when] many neighborhood children had to go to school in tattered
shoes or barefoot."
"Why didn't their parents just buy them new shoes?" the young Maestro asked. "Because
their fathers had lost their jobs when the shoe factories closed," answered
his nan. "Why did the factories close down?" asked the enquiring young mind. "Because
nobody had any money to buy shoes."
"The circularity of her logic bothered him yet illustrated a key puzzle of
the Depression," Ip says of the prodigal wonk. "Why was there so much idle
capacity when there were so many unmet needs?" Hence the childish solution
today, conceived when "Young Ben [was only] six or seven years old"...
More money for more shoes than more people could ever have wished for!
"My government's overriding priority is to ensure the stability of the British
economy during the global economic downturn," said HM Queen Elizabeth II this
week at the state opening of Britain's parliament. To that end, "My government
is committed to helping families and businesses through difficult times," she
went on, reading her government's script. The help, like the aim, is simply
to steal from tomorrow to refinance yesterday's errors. And where theft or
debt can't be managed, government will simply print new money instead. Because
everyone else running competing economies with competing currencies also stands
ready to throw fresh claims at the world...claims in cash-form to keep families
in housing, workers in jobs, shoppers out shopping, bankers in banking.
The alternative course just can't be allowed. Even if it can't now be avoided.
Third and final part (promise!) to follow...
|