|
The freedom to fail is an essential part of freedom. Government provided
financial security necessitates relinquishing the very essence of freedom.
Last week, the big 3 American automakers came back to Capitol Hill with their
hands out to the government. Congress spent this past week debating how much
money to give them and what strings should be attached. Though the bailout
plan for the auto industry has suffered what I would call a temporary setback
in the Senate, other avenues for public funding are being explored through
the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. I am afraid the American auto
industry will soon learn that having billions rain down from Washington will
not be the blessing one might expect.
The government, after it subsidizes an industry, tends to become a very demanding
benefactor. Politicians may not have any real idea about how to build a car,
run a bank, educate a child, heal the sick or build a road, but they are quite
adept at using carrots and sticks to manipulate and threaten those who do.
Most of the federal control over education, roads, healthcare, and now banking
and soon auto manufacturing, is done through money, mandates and conditions.
The bailout proposal we were considering would force automobile manufacturers
to submit their business plans for the approval of a new federal "car czar." This
bureaucrat would have the authority to approve the automakers' restructuring
plan, monitor implementation of the plan, and even stop certain transactions
he determines are inconsistent with the companies' long-term viability.
One could argue that if billions of taxpayer dollars are going to flow into
a failing industry, then representatives of those taxpayers have "bought" a
say in how that industry is run - which is precisely why bailouts are such
a bad idea for both the industry and the taxpayers. The federal government
has neither the competence nor the Constitutional authority to tell private
companies, such as automakers, how to run their businesses. I would have thought
that failed experiments with central planning and government control of business
that caused so much harm in the last century would have taught my colleagues
the folly of making businesses obey politicians and bureaucrats instead of
heeding the wishes of consumers, employees, and stockholders. But the auto
industry is in danger of learning for themselves one of the oldest lessons
in politics: he who pays the fiddler calls the tune.
It is not the job of government to sustain business. The government should
get out of the way, and instead examine excessive regulations, tax policy and
red tape that have been hostile to manufacturing in this country. We should
get back on a sustainable economic course in this country, or we are doomed
to collapse, as the Soviets did, under the crushing burden of big government
and a strangled economy that can no longer pay for it.
|
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation
as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading
spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free
markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed
currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents
for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul
never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized
by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon,
Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Dr. Ron Paul
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|