|
Billions of dollars were recently lost in the collapse of Bernie Madoff's
self-described Ponzi scheme, in which too-good-to-be-true returns on investments
were not really returns at all, but the funds of defrauded new investors. The
pyramid scheme collapsed dramatically when too many clients called in their
accounts, and not enough new victims could be found to support these withdrawals.
Bernie Madoff was running a blatant fraud operation. Fraud is already illegal,
and he will be facing criminal consequences, which is as it should be, and
should act as an appropriate deterrent to potential future criminals. But it
seems every time someone breaks the law, politicians and pundits decide we
need more laws, even though lack of laws was not the problem.
The government itself runs a fraud much bigger than Madoff's. Our Social Security
system is the very definition of a Ponzi, or pyramid scheme. If the government
truly had an interest in protecting people's savings, they would allow people
to opt out of Social Security altogether. We would cut wasteful spending, such
as our overseas empire, to honor current obligations to seniors, and eventually
phase the program out. Instead, as with Enron and Sarbanes Oxley, I expect
new, unrelated legislation to be proposed that further damages freedom in the
name of protecting us, amidst loud proclamations that they have made the world
safe.
Merely passing a law does not fix any problems, just as throwing paper at
a recession does not stop it. How can a government so complicit in mandatory
public fraud effectively pre-empt private fraud? I see no reason to believe
that any new law, or regulatory agency will solve anything. But I do see liberty
slipping away every time Congress decides to "do something". We already have
an oversight agency, the SEC, which did a poor job overseeing and preventing
this, but does a great job hamstringing honest, productive businesses and driving
them overseas.
Total trust in government solutions only creates moral hazard, and amplifies
risky behavior. Trust in government got us here. We trusted government to eliminate
risk, but it just made risk more creative and dangerous. We trusted the Federal
Reserve, a supra-governmental cabal of private banks, to know better than the
free market what interest rates should be, and how to stabilize the business
cycle, but like a spinning top that loses its balance, it has instead spun
the business cycle and the economy wildly out of control.
No governmental activity can negate market forces or nullify the cardinal
rule of caveat emptor. Government can however, use our fears against us and
promise unrealistic outcomes as a means to consolidate power and erode our
liberties. Liberty comes with risk. This is a fact of life. But life without
liberty is not much of a life at all.
The only way the American people will get through these difficult times is
through our own resilience and ingenuity. At best, the government is irrelevant
in finding prosperity again. At worst, government can present a massive obstacle
for the economy to overcome. If we do not wise up and rein government back
in to its Constitutional limitations, bloated government could be a cumbersome
unnecessary weight the economy will continually have to support to stay afloat.
|
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation
as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading
spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free
markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed
currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents
for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul
never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized
by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon,
Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Dr. Ron Paul
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|