|
As I sit back and look at the market go through its bear rally, performing
a myriad of what if scenarios on my various bearish positions and generating
cash where feasible by selling off profits, I revisited the Doo Doo 32 and
a few big name banks. I say to myself, "This year will not be as easy as last
year, now that nearly everybody should be aware of the extent of the problem,
and the violent bear market rally/option spreads that makes shorting and put
buying very expensive." Then I listen to talking heads in the media and the "everbull",
long only professionals. I ponder, "Hmm, maybe there is a little low hanging
fruit to be had after all". To be sure, we will have to sit through this bear
market rally which has to hurt anybody not in all cash or hedged, and there
seems to be a willingness of traders to push this one relatively far. The FACTS
still remain though, if the stocks of the BoomBustBlog bear targets move much
farther, this could very well be another repeat of last year's triple digit
performance. Yes, it's risky, but risk is the price of reward, isn't it.
With that disclaimer espoused, let's look at how accurate my longer term thesis
have fared. The graph below was taken from the Doo
Doo 32 article.
In order to determine how likely the aforementioned event is, let's create
a metric by which Reggie Middleton measures risk. This metric will be units
of risky or non-performing assets as a percentage of statutory equity.
This, of course, can be refined by removing goodwill, Bullsh1t, and the
various accounting pollutants to plain old economic earnings, but less
just start with this. When applying Reggie's Risk Metric to the graphs
above, we can identify more banks.

Larger
Image
Looking at risk from this perspective, we not only see who has no clothes
on when the tide goes out, but also how well (un)endowed they are in addition.
Now, compare the companies from the Doo
Doo 32 article and the allocation of the TARP program below (sans the
companies that have already failed or have been driven into other firms),
and you will see that I am on to something. After all, the Doo Doo 32 article
was penned on May 22, 2008, about 7 months ago. This was despite the fact
that Treasury Secretary Paulson assured all of us that the worst was behind
us (see The
credit crisis is (not) waning and then Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure redux).
| Allocation of TARP Capital Injections
($ billions) 100% = $250 bn |
| Others (201 in total count) |
$ 48 |
| Citigroup |
$ 45 |
| AIG |
$ 40 |
| Bank of America/Merrill Lynch/CountryWide |
$ 25 |
| JP Morgan Chase/Bear Stearns/WaMu |
$ 25 |
| Wells Fargo |
$ 25 |
| Godlman Sachs |
$ 10 |
| Morgan Stanley |
$ 10 |
| PNC |
$ 8 |
| US Bancorp |
$ 7 |
| Sun Trust |
$ 5 |
| Unallocated |
$ 3 |
Now "the worst is behind us" Secretary Paulson wants to claim the balance
of the TARP that is not already spent. WHY??? Well let's look at it visually.

Big on this list are the recipients of much of my research from early last
year. Never let it be said that I don't have a clue about what's going on.
Well, I have some other thoughts on certain financial institutions, the first
of which is available below (with at least one other following). Subscribers
can view my opinion here. I trust you will find the inconsistencies that I
have found to be quite interesting. You will also be wise to beware of those "name
brands" that are "too big to fail"! Keep the recent post, "The
banking backdrop for 2009 " in mind as you read the following:
JP
Morgan Forensic Highlights 2009-01-06 19:18:08 133.34 Kb
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|