|
One of my ten predictions for 2009 is that Bank of America goes to single
digit, which is happening today (1/15) and trading below $8 while I am typing
this. I didn't expect it happens so fast, especially it traded as high as $18
in December while I wrote my ten predictions for 2009. Here is the excerpt
of what I predicted in 2009:
"Bank of America (BOA) falls into single digits (less than $10)......... The
trouble for BOA is of its own making with their decisions to purchase Countrywide
and Merrill Lynch, both of which have heavy amounts of toxic home mortgages,
associated derivative "assets", and OTC credit default swaps. BOA, wanting
to be a banking powerhouse like Citigroup, didn't realize that the balance
sheet risk from those purchases can wipe out their $70 billion market cap many
times over. They want to be the brave guy surfing in a tsunami, instead of
retreating far away to the shore, which will overwhelm them and put their going
business concern and survivability into a big question mark in 2009."
Yesterday Citi has announced to abandon their previous business model of financial
supermarket as the company finally gave up after too long a period of indecision
and resistance. Citi now realizes that they will never survive with the highly
risky assets in some divisions if bundled together as a whole company.
For over several months, I have suspected that BOA's problem was worse than
people realized. Besides their risky and toxic assets inherited from Countrywide
and Merrill, I also felt that their large commercial loan portfolio would be
in big trouble in 2009. In addition, many people forgot they also purchased
MBNA in 2006, how does their credit card loan portfolio look now? For the last
2 years, every acquisition has only added more troubles for BOA one after another,
not even considering overpaying Merrill by 3 times.
The biggest surprise I have and never really understand is that in order to
pursue their financial powerhouse dream as to compete with Citi, BOA brushed
aside the balance sheet risk and didn't take it seriously at all, quite ignorant
and irresponsible to run a business in a credit crunch time. Of course, who
would really care and safeguard its common shareholders? In a credit crisis,
assets are always in a downward spiral, worth less and less through time, while
liabilities remain unchanged, wiping out shareholder equity faster than anyone
can ever imagine. With all the time bombers in BOA's portfolio exploding at
the same time like fireworks this year, I just don't know how BOA can survive?
Of course, they will survive, just like Citi, since BOA is in the government
category of too big to fail. Probably in a few months, under government pressure,
BOA will do the same thing as Citi, spinning off divisions with toxic assets
such as MBNA, Countrywide and Merrill, the infamous "non-core" assets as called
by Citi, at one tenth of their original purchase prices. This way, with government's
bailout capital, BOA will be back to its original business model of 3 years
ago, from financial supermarket back to only retail banking. The problem is
that government bailout funding always has a higher hierarchy in bank's capital
structure, in debts or at least in preferreds by getting paid at 10% interest
to further erode common equities through all future years. What will be left
for the Bank of America common shareholders? The answer is probably nothing.
|
Thomas Tan, CFA, MBA
www.investorwalk.com
Disclaimer: The contents of this article represent
the opinion and analysis of Thomas Tan, who cannot accept responsibility for
any trading losses you may incur as a result of your reliance on this opinion
and analysis and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon
any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Individuals should
consult with their broker and personal financial advisors before engaging in
any trading activities. Do your own due diligence regarding personal investment
decisions.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Thomas Z. Tan
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2010
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|