|
The following is an excerpt from commentary that originally appeared
at Treasure Chests for
the benefit of subscribers on Thursday, January 15th, 2009.
Like the
others, it appears what was formerly reliable sentiment related analysis
associated with the study of open
interest put / call ratios has now succumb to an increasingly mature
market(s) condition. Of course, technically, such a conclusion could be viewed
as incorrect in that the reason stocks did not go up this week was not because
of selling, but because of a buyers strike. This is why in spite of such devastatingly
bad news associated with the economy, and there was a multitude of it
this week, stocks did not fall more. It should be noted this has caught the
attention of a great many market participants, which is the dynamic that
will eventually set up the next round of 'unwarranted complacency' we expect
to grip investor psychology in spring, allowing for far stepper losses in
stocks than is being witnessed at present.
Before this happens however, and assuming investors find a reason to come
back into the stock market prior to this, it makes sense to hypothecate that
to some degree prices should rise at least one more time into a seasonal high
within the anticipated post crash March / April timing window, which as you
may know would be consistent with the 1929
/ 1930 experience. And as you will see below, such an outcome would also
be consistent with the post crash patterns witnessed in the 1937 / 1938 sequence,
as well as the Nikki crash of the 90's. So, in total then, it appears it might
be a bit early to write off our sentiment related studies entirely, especially
if sentiment remains bearish, and a squeeze is engineered into spring.
What's more, and as you will see below, if history is a good guide, the next
squeeze should be even more vicious than the one that peaked out just last
week, so whatever you do, don't short the stock market here, even if new precedents
are about to be established. Heaven knows the fundamentals are
pointing to lower prices, and this should become a reality later this year,
however as pointed out in our opening remarks, by and large investors are on
a 'buyers strike' right now, not panicking out the market, which is suggestive
that when buying reappears, it could be 'elevator up' in a big way.
So, although we may need to go down and 'test the lows', which in itself will
bring buying back into the market from those looking for such a test, again,
if history is a good guide, this not the time to be bearish, but cautiously
optimistic better shorting opportunities lie ahead. That is to say although
higher prices may be in the cards moving forward, this doesn't mean that you
should be attempting to pick this bottom. No, such a conclusion would be an
error for fundamentally conservative investors. As mentioned a few weeks back
now, all the easy money in this counter-trend rally off the November lows has
already been made, and that most market participants should wait for oversold
conditions to return.
Of course in the larger sense this may take until the fall again, where in
the meantime, some juicy shorting opportunities maybe presented, again, in
the March / April post crash bounce topping window, mentioned above. This will
be the next 'easy money' made in my opinion, where opportunity would be aligned
with the fundamentals once
again. Further to this, I do like prospects for another squeeze higher in crude
oil coming up as well, where as mentioned earlier
in the week, after options expire tomorrow, perhaps we will witness a change
in sentiment. If this were to occur, coupled with the fact oil has seen no
appreciable bounce with the rest of the equity complex, the condition set would
be 'prime' in my opinion, where long positions in appropriate ETF's would be
contemplated once again.
And of course strength in the broads would also be requisite for a 'high confidence
move' in this regard, so why don't we take a look at a few historical comparisons
in sizing up prospects moving forward. In this first panel below we are looking
at the post crash Dow from the 1937 / 1938 sequence overlaid with the post
bubble in the Nasdaq to set the larger picture, which is an exact match as
you can see. (See Figure 1)
Figure 1

The understanding here, as you may remember from previous discussions on the
subject, is that psychologically people do not change during periods of mass
mania / stress, and that crowd behavior will repeat from generation to generation
as circumstances dictate. And the fact we have such tight pattern repeats on
the overlays is of course indisputable proof this is the case, highly suggestive
future outcome should be anticipated to mirror previous patterns closely, to
say the least. Here is a close-up view a Dow / S&P 500 (SPX) overlay measuring
the same time periods to drive this point home. (See Figure 2)
Figure 2

Apparently even if there is a divergence in post bubble behavior one should
expect such differences to be closed at some point, which is the lesson learned
in viewing this next panel, that of the 'modern day' post bubble patterns in
the Nasdaq and Nikki. Notice how a delusional US bureaucracy / investing population
attempted to push prices back into bubble territory without a thought of the
consequences, which we are now facing. (See Figure 3)
Figure 3

This divergence was closed however. And now, because so much more credit was
issued in attempting to rebubblize the system, the aftermath of the US experience
may in fact be worse than the Japanese experience pattern wise, where in 'whipsaw'
fashion, the Nasdaq might begin under-performing the Nikki. How do we know
this other than by deduction associated with simple market / physical dynamics?
Well, for one thing US broads still have a long way to fall if they are to
come close to mirroring the Japanese experience. And for another thing, despite
the fact US stocks were essentially 'halved' in just over a year at the bottom
in November, margin debt levels remained divergently elevated, and they are
still elevated today. (See Figure 4)
Figure 4

Charts provided by The
Chart Store
In taking a lesson from what we learned about divergences from above then,
this means that at some point the percentage of margin debt currently being
utilized in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) will need to be brought back
down to 'mean levels', at a minimum, with overshoot on the downside very possible
once the ball gets rolling. That's what tends to happen when 'wave amplitude'
goes too far one way you know. The reaction also tends to overshoot the mean
going the other way too. What's scary about this realization, where this is
the 'scary chart' I was referring to earlier in the week, is that if prices
contract proportionally to margin debt as per the logarithmic scale presented
in Figure 4, then it's not inconceivable to see them down some 90%, just like
what has happened to all the other bubble markets throughout history.
Unfortunately we cannot carry on past this point, as the remainder of this
analysis is reserved for our subscribers. Of course if the above is the kind
of analysis you are looking for this is easily remedied by visiting our continually
improved web site to
discover more about how our service can help you in not only this regard, but
also in achieving your financial goals. For your information, our newly reconstructed
site includes such improvements as automated subscriptions, improvements to
trend identifying / professionally annotated charts, to the more detailed
quote pages exclusively designed for independent investors who like to
stay on top of things. Here, in addition to improving our advisory service,
our aim is to also provide a resource center, one where you have access to
well presented 'key' information concerning the markets we cover.
And if you have any questions, comments, or criticisms regarding the above,
please feel free to drop
us a line. We very much enjoy hearing from you on these matters.
Good investing all.
|
Captain Hook
TreasureChests.info
Treasure Chests is a market timing service specializing
in value-based position trading in the precious metals and equity markets with
an orientation geared to identifying intermediate-term swing trading opportunities.
Specific opportunities are identified utilizing a combination of fundamental,
technical, and inter-market analysis. This style of investing has proven very
successful for wealthy and sophisticated investors, as it reduces risk and
enhances returns when the methodology is applied effectively. Those interested
in discovering more about how the strategies described above can enhance your
wealth should visit our web site at Treasure
Chests.
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion and
is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived
from sources and utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept
responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Comments within the text should not be construed as specific recommendations
to buy or sell securities. Individuals should consult with their broker and
personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities. We are
not registered brokers or advisors. Certain statements included herein may
constitute "forward-looking statements" with the meaning of certain securities
legislative measures. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance
or achievements of the above mentioned companies, and / or industry results,
to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Do your own due diligence.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages
are copyrighted by treasurechests.info Inc. No part of these pages, either
text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore,
reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons
other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Copyright © 2003-2010 treasurechests.info
Inc. All rights reserved.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2010
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|