|
This article is part of a syndicated series about deflation from
market analyst Robert Prechter, the world's foremost expert on and proponent
of the deflationary scenario. For more on deflation and how you can survive
it, download
Prechter's FREE 60-page Deflation Survival eBook, part of Prechter's NEW
Deflation Survival Guide.
The following article was adapted from Robert Prechter's NEW Deflation
Survival eBook, a 60-page compilation of Prechter's most important teachings
and warnings about deflation.
Myth 1: "War Will Bail Out the Economy"
Many people argue that war will bring both inflation and economic boom. Wars
have not been fought in order to inflate money supplies. You might recall that
Germany went utterly broke in 1923 via hyperinflation yet managed to start
a world war 16 years later, which was surely not engaged in order to inflate
the country's money supply. Nor are wars and inflated money supplies guarantors
of economic boom. The American colonies and the Confederate states each hyperinflated
their currencies during wartime, but doing so did not help their economies;
quite the opposite. With respect to war, the standard procedure today would
be for the government to borrow to finance a war, which would not necessarily
guarantee inflation. If new credit at current prices were unavailable, either
the new debt could not be sold or it would "crowd out" other new debt. The
U.S. could decide to inflate its currency as opposed to the credit supply.
As explained in Conquer the Crash, doing so would be seen today as a
highly imprudent course, so it is unlikely, to say the least. If it were to
occur anyway, the collapse of bond prices in response would neutralize the
currency inflation until the credit markets were wiped out. Despite these arguments,
I concede that war can be so disruptive, involving the destruction of goods
and the curtailment of commercial services, that the environment from the standpoint
of prices could end up appearing inflationary. To summarize my view, the monetary
result may not be certain, but an inflationary result is hardly inevitable.
There is in fact a reliable relationship between monetary trends and war.
A downturn in social mood towards defensiveness, anger and fear causes people
to (1) withdraw credit from the marketplace, which reduces the credit supply
and (2) get angry with one another, which eventually leads to a fight. That's
why The Elliott Wave Theorist has been predicting both deflation and
war. You cannot cure one with the other; they are results of the same cause.
Myth 2: "Deflation Will Cause a Run on the Dollar, Which Will Make Prices
Rise"
This is an argument that deflation will cause inflation, which is untenable.
In terms of domestic purchasing power, the dollar's value should rise in deflation.
You will then be able to buy more of most goods and services.
It is unknown how the dollar will fare against other currencies, and
there is no way to answer that question other than following Elliott wave patterns
as they develop. From the standpoint of predicting deflation, the dollar's
convertibility ratios are irrelevant. There may well be a "run on the dollar" against
foreign currencies, but it would not be because of deflation. I think the impulse
to predict a run on the dollar comes from people who own a lot of gold, silver
or Swiss francs. They feel the '70s returning, and so they envision the dollar
falling against all of these alternatives. If deflation occurs, a concurrent
drop in the dollar relative to other currencies would be for other reasons.
Perhaps the dollar is overvalued because it has enjoyed reserve status for
so long, which might make it fall relative to other currencies. If this is
what you expect, what are you going to buy in the currency arena? The yen?
Japan has been leading the way into the abyss. The Euro? Depression will wrack
the European Union. Maybe the Swiss franc or the Singapore dollar. But these
are technical questions, not challenges to deflation or domestic price behavior.
Myth 3: "Consumers Remain the Engine Driving the U.S. Economy"
Only producers can afford to buy things. A consumer qua consumer has
no economic value or power.
The only way that consumers who are not (adequate) producers can buy things
is to borrow the money. So when economists tell you that the consumer
is holding up the economy, they mean that expanding credit is holding
up the economy. This is a description of the problem, not the solution!
The more the consumer goes into hock, the worse the problem gets, which is
precisely the opposite of what economists are telling us. The more you hear
that the consumer is propping up the economy, the more you know that the debt
bubble is growing, and with it the risk of deflation.
For more on deflation, download
Prechter's FREE 60-page Deflation Survival eBook or browse various
deflation topics like those below at www.elliottwave.com/deflation.
|