March 12, 2009
Global Debt - A Closer Look
by Reggie Middleton
|
|
 |
|
Another BoomBustBlog reader Op-Ed piece...
Table of Contents
- Conclusions
- General - How much debt did we pile on?
- Household Debt, % of Disposable Income - OECD Nations, 1985-2005
- Private Domestic Debt - All Countries - Current
- Savings Rate Change, 1960-2006 - OECD Nations
- Honing in on Australia - 1985 was the starting point
- Honing in on the USA - 1985 was again when we *really* went out of control
Conclusions
These are the main conclusions:
- Europe really messed up. They on average have household debtloads
that are as big or bigger than ours, and they grew their debt a lot more
quickly on average.
- Germany was the only conservative OECD member. Sad.
- Japan's having low private debt is a myth. Just check the data.
They haven't raised it, for sure, but at the same time they came into their
debt deflation with a very high level of debt which has persisted.
- OECD countries have approximately doubled their debt as % of disposable
income from 1985 to 2005. This was a global debt bubble!
- 1985 seems like the hinging point where all countries went on a spending
bonanza. Check out the savings rates. Also, check out the debt charts
for Australia and the US.
- China, S. Korea, Hong Kong are no better than the EU on private domestic
debt. Well, that busts that myth.
- Brazil, India, Russia and Saudi Arabia do indeed have very little debt. Brazil
is 83%, India is 62%, Russia is 19%, Saudi Arabia is 13% - these guys are
very low.
Taken together, this supports the notion that the world as a whole has heavily
indebted itself greatly over the past 20 years. It appears the world has doubled
its collective debt to spend and speculate on housing, which is about to lose
$25-50T on them.
Required Reading:
- Debt
- Thoughts On A Global Problem (Part 1),
- Banking
out of Control (Part 2)
- Part (3) Global
Debt Stats from the BoomBustBlog Community
- Reggie
Middleton on the Irish Macro Outlook
- The
Big Bank Bust
- Continued
Deterioration in Global Lending, Government Intervention in Free Markets
- The
Butterfly is released!
- Global
Recession - an economic reality
- The
Banking Backdrop for 2009
- Reader's
Op Ed
Recommended Reading - The Asset Securitization Crisis:
- Intro:
The great housing bull run - creation of asset bubble, Declining lending
standards, lax underwriting activities increased the bubble - A comparison
with the same during the S&L crisis
- Securitization
- dissimilarity between the S&L and the Subprime Mortgage crises, The
bursting of housing bubble - declining home prices and rising foreclosure
- Counterparty
risk analyses - counter-party failure will open up another Pandora's
box (must read for anyone who is not a CDS specialist)
- The
consumer finance sector risk is woefully unrecognized, and the US Federal
reserve to the rescue
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part I
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part 2 (should be read
by whoever is not a muni expert - this newsbyte
may be worth reading as well)
- An
overview of my personal Regional Bank short prospects Part I: PNC Bank
- risky loans skating on razor thin capital, PNC addendum Posts One and Two
- Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure
redux
- More
on the banking backdrop, we've never had so many loans!
- As
I see it, these 32 banks and thrifts are in deep doo-doo!
- A
little more on HELOCs, 2nd lien loans and rose colored glasses
- Will
Countywide cause the next shoe to drop?
- Capital,
Leverage and Loss in the Banking System
- Doo-Doo
bank drill down, part 1 - Wells Fargo
- Doo-Doo
Bank 32 drill down: Part 2 - Popular
- Doo-Doo
Bank 32 drill down: Part 3 - SunTrust Bank
- The
Anatomy of a Sick Bank!
- Doo
Doo Bank 32 Drill Down 1.5: Wells Fargo Bank
- GE:
The Uber Bank???
- Sun
Trust Forensic Analysis
- Goldman
Sachs Snapshot: Risk vs. Reward vs. Reputations on the Street
- Goldman
Sachs Forensic Analysis
- American
Express: When the best of the best start with the shenanigans, what does
that mean for the rest...
- Part
one of three of my opinion of HSBC and the macro factors affecting it
- The
Big Bank Bust
- Continued
Deterioration in Global Lending, Government Intervention in Free Markets
- The
Butterfly is released!
- Global
Recession - an economic reality
- The
Banking Backdrop for 2009
- Reggie
Middleton on the Irish Macro Outlook
General - How much debt did we pile on?
The next question is, just how much debt did these other countries lump on
top of their property bubbles, and how much change did we see in the past 30
years?
Well, we have some data on that. Clear data is available on Australia and
the US. There was also a most prescient piece put out by the OECD (again!)
in December 2006, titled "Has the Rise in Debt Made Households More Vulnerable?" (source).
Household Debt, % of Disposable Income - OECD Nations, 1985-2005
Consider these graphs of [Household Debt as % of Disposable Income ], and
the % change in that figure, from 1995 to 2005 (source):

Larger
Image
Observations:
- We know how badly the US screwed up (badly) - it appears that Denmark,
the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, the UK and Ireland are worse, while
Sweden, Japan and Canada are not at all far behind.
- From the prior analysis on global housing bubbles, Denmark, the Netherlands,
New Zealand, Australia, the UK and Ireland all had some of the worst housing
bubbles of anyone.
- Germany was not affected, and France was affected, but less than average.
- Incomes are probably inflated.
The graph below pulls us 10 years further back, comparing Household Debt /
GDP for all OECD nations in 1985, 1995 and 2005 (source):

Larger
Image
Observations:
- Over the past 20 years we have nearly doubled our household debt as a %
of GDP, from 43% in 1985 to 80% in 2005.
- This just isn't right. This is prima fascie evidence of a debt bubble.
Private Domestic Debt - All Countries - Current
Below is the graph of Domestic Private Debt. This is different from household
debt. It is defined by the CIA World Factbook (source)
in the following way:
"the total quantity of credit, denominated in the domestic currency, provided
by banks to nonbanking institutions. The national currency units have been
converted to US dollars at the closing exchange rate on the date of the information."
What this can do for us is "plug in the gaps" to see where the major non-OECD
members stand.

Larger
Image
Observations:
- China, at 110%, is basically on par with the EU as a whole, as well as
Australia, South Korea, and Hong Kong. It appears the major Asian non-OECD
nations do *not* have super-low debt.
- Brazil is 83%, India is 62%, Russia is 19%, Saudi Arabia is 13% - these
guys are very low.
What this says to me is that most of the world is quite heavily indebted.
The only ones who aren't are the non-Asian, non-OECD countries. And Germany.
Savings Rate Change, 1960-2006 - OECD Nations
Below is a graph of the change in the savings rate for the major OECD countries,
as well as a graph of the savings rate for many of these countries from 1960-2006
(where available) (source, source, source, source):




Observations:
- 10 of 15 had their savings rate drop by 4% or more.
- Only 1 of 15 actually went up!
- For all countries, there really seemed to be a paradigm shift in 1985 -
we all stopped saving as much starting then.
Honing in on Australia - 1985 was the starting point
It was shown above that Australia goofed up big time. They borrowed a ton,
they stopped saving, and they had a huge housing bubble. Australia has been
shown many times to have had a Private Debt bubble. The graph below shows that
mortgage debt as a % of GDP went from ~16% in 1985 to ~85% in 2008 (source):

We really began shooting to the moon in 1985. Again, 1985 seems like the global
starting point for the debt and spending craze.
Honing in on the USA - 1985 was again when we *really* went out of control
This is how much debt we lumped onto our housing bubble (source):


Once again we see 1985 as a starting point. Debt was growing - hard - beforehand,
but it was in 1985 when we saw homeowners' equity take a concerted leg downwards.
And that was off inflated pricing. If we were to adjust pricing to reality,
home equity would be even less.
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|
|