|
In the spring of 2008 oil tumbled from a high of $148 per barrel to $36 a
barrel in December, and the commodities bubble was deemed popped. Gold dropped,
silver fell roughly 58% from its high and palladium fell a remarkable 72% etc.
But was this the result of a commodities bubble popping or could it possibly
have been a credit bubble burst which happened to dramatically affect the price
of commodities? This is important to understand in order for investors to determine
where value is for future growth.
In 2008 the world finally realized that home values were substantially overvalued
and that bank stocks, which are highly leveraged to home values through the
issuing of mortgages, tanked. As hedge funds, mutual funds, institutions and
private investors etc. scrambled to cover losing bets by selling popular investments,
all assets went down. In our opinion, all types of investors were racing to
get "liquid" (raise cash) as investment margins and home values collapsed.
In a dramatic change of events, investors sold assets and turned those assets
into cash, causing the US dollar to rise in value. This can be seen in the
charts below.

In the chart above, notice the dramatic spike in the US dollar index as investors
liquidated their investments. At the same time, note the dramatic drop in various
markets in the charts below.



As the US dollars value rose, nearly all investments priced in US dollars
fell. But the key questions and facts to remember in our mind are as follows:
-
What markets currently have strong fundamentals and what markets have
weak fundamentals?
-
Do we believe paper currencies, which can be printed at will by governments
(inflation), are a sound long term investment? We do not believe so. Because
of this, are currencies likely to lose value relative to "things" long
term? We believe so.
-
Is the US consumer overextended with debt and are their spending patterns
likely to continue to decline going forward? We believe so. Does the world
still needs to eat food, drive cars, ship goods, store wealth etc.? Yes.
-
Compared to historical bubble markets did the growth in commodities prices
reach excessive bubble price levels on a percentage basis? We do not believe
so.
-
Is it possible the credit implosion for investors and institutions caused
the commodities bull market to appear over when in reality it is still
in progress? Possibly. Can we see evidence of this? Yes.
We believe the "price" of investments can be misleading because the unit of
measure, the US dollar, is also moving. We know that in 2008 the price of Gold
in US dollars fell along with all investments but we also know the US dollar
significantly jumped as investors paid off debt. So if we look at the value
of gold when we measure it directly against other assets we see the following:




Notice that when the value of gold is priced in other assets, not only did
it recover; it actually rose from the spring 2008 drop. Relative to the Dow
Jones, gold is becoming significantly more valuable as it requires a larger
share of the Dow Jones to buy one ounce of gold. Making this direct market
to market comparison helps us see how gold has performed relative to other
markets rather than simply to the US dollar itself. In our opinion the commodities
bubble has not popped because there was no bubble to begin with. Instead we
believe the effects of the credit bubble caused the price of commodities to
drop but the fundamentals not only remain strong; they have actually improved.
The above charts illustrate that the gold bull market is alive and well relative
to other markets.
In the short term we cannot tell you exactly what will happen in any given
market. Market gyrations, short term fluctuations, random events, human emotions
etc. all make it very difficult to guess where a market is headed in the short
term. At investmentscore.com we
try to bypass the distortions of the fluctuating measuring stick, the US dollar,
and compare markets directly to one another instead. We try to use relative
market comparisons to help us spot long term market trends. Commodities may
have significantly fallen in "price" in 2008 but we believe they are still
the relatively undervalued asset class with solid fundamentals. Whether it
is in the coming months or years that commodities take off relative to US Dollars,
we do believe that this market will continue to outperform other asset classes.
If you enjoyed this analysis please feel free to pass along a link to this
article and share it with your friends. Also to learn more about our theories
and strategy and to sign up for our free newsletter please visit us at www.investmentscore.com.
|
Michael Kilbach
Legal Disclaimer: No content provided as part of
the Investment Score Inc. information constitutes a recommendation that any
particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy
is suitable for any specific person. None of the information providers, including
the staff of Investment Score Inc. or their affiliates will advise you personally
concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability or any particular security,
portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy or other matter.
Investment Score Inc. its officers, directors, employees, affiliates, suppliers,
advertisers and agents may or may not own precious metals investments at any
given time. To the extent any of the content published as part of the Investment
Score Inc. information may be deemed to be investment advice, such information
is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person.
Investment Score Inc. does not claim any of the information provided is complete,
absolute and/or exact. Investment Score Inc. its officers, directors, employees,
affiliates, suppliers, advertisers and agents are not qualified investment
advisers. It is recommended investors conduct their own due diligence on any
investment including seeking professional advice from a certified investment
adviser before entering into any transaction. The performance data is supplied
by sources believed to be reliable, that the calculations herein are made using
such data, and that such calculations are not guaranteed by these sources,
the information providers, or any other person or entity, and may not be complete.
From time to time, reference may be made in our information materials to prior
articles and opinions we have provided. These references may be selective,
may reference only a portion of an article or recommendation, and are likely
not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously provided information
and data may no be current and should not be relied upon.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Michael Kilbach
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|