Printer Friendly

eMail Article

March 24, 2009

Pivotal Events
by Bob Hoye

The following is part of Pivotal Events that was published for our subscribers Thursday, March 19, 2009.

SIGNS OF THE TIMES:

Last Year:

"UCLA Economics Forecast"

"We don't see [a recession] happening. This is tough call, but I will be very surprised if this actually precipitates into a recession."

- AP, March 11, 2008

"So Congress tried to make sure it [The Depression] would never happen again by creating a system of regulation and guarantees that provide a safety net for the financial system."

- Nobel winner, Paul Krugman, New York Times, March 21, 2008

"Banks are particularly attractive - will lead us out of the doldrums."

- Matrix Asset Management, Business News Network, March 28, 2008

"Most banks are a 'Widows and Orphans' short."

- Institutional Advisors, July, 2007

* * * * *

This Year:

"Jim Rogers said that the Federal Reserve will probably start buying treasuries to keep borrowing costs down, postponing a disaster in U.S. Government bonds."

- Bloomberg, March 9, 2009

This observation is so naïve as to be almost Zen-like. History provides many outstanding examples of unintended consequences, but one of the biggest involves simple arithmetic and government ambition.

At the secular low in interest rates for long-dated treasuries in the 1940s, the establishment got used to rates around 2.5 percent. Then as the yield rose to 3 % politicians and bureaucrats were quick to calculate that the overall cost of servicing government debt would increase.

Responsive to advice from economic charlatans, the treasury was persuaded that buying treasuries out of the market would lower long term interest rates. This went on and as the program was flooding currency markets with dollars - said dollar depreciated, forcing an inflation premium upon interest rates. The result was rising long interest rates and the 6 percent level had even greater arithmetic, and the federales redoubled their efforts to lower long rates.

The "new" buying program was propagandized as "Operation Twist", and a subsequent Fed paper noted: "From this episode [Operation Twist], many policymakers and analysts should have recognized that long-term interest rates cannot be substantially reduced by market gimmicks." Although it was abandoned in 1966, other misguided efforts to artificially lower interest rates conspired to drive long rates to 15 percent in 1981.

It is worth recalling the story that China and India were going to drive commodities for years:

"Chinese house prices fell by a record last month, paced by a 15 % plunge in Shenzhen."

- Bloomberg, March 10, 2009

Rather than accepting official schemes on their face value, market participants should contemplate the doctrine of unintended consequences.

* * * * *

STOCK MARKETS

(The first part of this section was written on Wednesday morning, and we'll stay with it.)

The markets remain choppy, but somewhat higher highs are possible over the next 4 or 5 weeks. The S & P 500 index could get to around 805 and traders should be selling into the opportunity.

Actually, the composition of the venerable index may be suspect - some 220 of the companies are no longer qualified to be included in the index. The inaction to replace these seems equivalent to the ineptitude of bond rating agencies, or the blatant nonsense of still labeling sub-prime mortgage bonds, priced at 30, as "AAA".

Speculation about the Fed's program to buy longer-dated treasuries was confirmed yesterday, and so far, the results have been positive.

Above, we reviewed the disaster of "Operation Twist". Also, it is worth noting that during gold's natural bear market with the Tech Bubble it seemed that global central bankers could drive gold down "forever". What they did was sell taxpayers' gold into a cyclical low and were unable to prevent soaring investment demand for gold that typically accompanies a post-bubble disaster.

One of the other features of such a contraction is that within the initial couple of years real and nominal long rates seriously increase. Although owned by private banks, the Fed's reckless behaviour will eventually be hung on the taxpayer. Even the Fed should not be buying bonds at not very far off secular lows.

Although abruptly arbitrary, this week's policy seems to be part of the positive action we have been hoping would blossom in April.

We now watch for the exit for the general stock market.

Energy Prices: We have been expecting a rally in crude oil out to spring and last week noted that the big change in currencies would prompt a rally.

This would have worked without the drama from the Fed. It is worth adding that the "stimulus" did nothing to prevent an 1873 or 1929 crash and this intervention seems effective, because it is occurring when some joy in the markets has been possible.

Using the XOI, oil stocks will likely test the high of 1057 set in early January. This is a target. The recent low was 755 early in the month.

Three weeks ago, natural gas registered a Downside Capitulation at 3.92. The initial bounce took it to 4.38, but was unsustainable and the action has been dismal as the price declined to 3.75. Natgas typically follows crude and that strong move will soon prompt a good rally for gas.

At 300 a week and a half ago, gas stocks (XNG) were moving up before yesterday's Fed drama. That low sets a successful test of the crash low and the rise to 370 is anticipating the rally in the product. The high of 414 in early January is the target.

"Nowhere does history indulge in repetitions so often or so uniformly as in Wall Street. When you read contemporary accounts of booms or panics, the only thing that strikes you most forcibly is how little either stock speculation or stock speculators differ from yesterday. The game does not change, and neither does human nature."

- Reminiscences Of A Stock Operator, published in 1923 by Jesse Livermore under the pseudonym, Edwin LeFevre

Link to March 20th 'Bob and Phil Show' on Howestreet.com: http://www.howestreet.com/index.php?pl=/goldradio/index.php/mediaplayer/1152

Bob Hoye
Institutional Advisors

The opinions in this report are solely those of the author. The information herein was obtained from various sources; however we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. This research report is prepared for general circulation and is circulated for general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investors should note that income from such securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each securitys price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.

Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer to buy or sell any securities or options or futures contracts. Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are influenced by the currency of the underlying security, effectively assume currency risk.

Moreover, from time to time, members of the Institutional Advisors team may be long or short positions discussed in our publications.

Copyright © 2003-2009 Bob Hoye

Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009 SafeHaven.com

« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please visit RSSHelp for instructions. »