|
Russia has proposed that the I.M.F. created, synthetic currency [Special
Drawing Rights], with changes [Gold backing], be adopted by the world to
replace the U.S.$ as the world's prime reserve currency. Both China and Russia
proposed new currencies, not so much in the hope that their proposals will
be accepted, but bringing to the attention of the world that the $ is losing
credibility and not serving the role is should as the world's reserve currency.
At the same time the I.M.F. was boosted to a much stronger global role than
ever before by the addition of nearly $1 trillion to its Balance Sheet. It
seemed appropriate to Russia then to attempt to elevate the Special Drawing
Right to a real global currency from the synthetic bookkeeping role it has
at present. With the I.M.F. now placed in such an important role in the global
monetary world and if such a proposal were adopted, would it work?
The I.M.F. established the
Special Drawing Rights to serve as the reference point of the global monetary
system. However, it never made it there and now serves solely as an accounting
measure of value with little practical use. This was because the U.S. controls
the I.M.F. through its voting power [17.3% with 85% needed for a resolution
to pass], which are required before any motion can be passed. So the Special
Drawing Right was seen as an extension of the $, but in a world run by the
U.S. No nation will be happy with the States continuing to pull the strings
on such a global currency. The need is now for a currency that is truly global
currency above any local national interests.
It didn't before in the seventies, because there was insufficient political
will for it to do so. For it to do so now there would have to be the global
political will for it to do so and we are close to that now as the I.M.F. has
been allowed to issue $250 billion in S.D.R.'s to stimulate the world economy.
If the measures proposed by the G-20 conference last week do not succeed in
rectifying the global monetary system the currency world will begin to break
down. As it is, once the $ retreat back to the States is complete, it looks
like the € will rise strongly again against the $. For the currency world
to remain stable the exchange rate between these two currencies must remain
relatively stable. This stability remains under threat. With potential financial
mayhem just being skirted, never has the time been as pressing as now for a
global solution to the world's credit and associated crises. Without global
unity on this, there will be no solution and then it will be every trading
bloc for itself!
The I.M.F has the support of the world [provided China and Russia are given
a greater say in that body and the U.S. stranglehold over it is removed by
lowering its voting power below 15%] to 'manage' the global monetary system,
as we mentioned above.
With this threatening situation hanging over us, it also looks like only the
I.M.F. has the support of the world to adjust and agree any fundamental reforms
to the monetary system. This is a view confirmed at the G-20 meeting where
both China and Russia called for new global reserve currencies. While there
is little chance that these proposals will be accepted, through it, China and
Russia made their presence known and initiated the reformation of the monetary
system. Certainly the time has come when China cannot be ignored on such matters.
While the U.S. Treasury Secretary has said the U.S. $ will remain the global
reserve currency, he was open to look at suggestions.
Now Russia has said it would favor the inclusion of gold bullion in
the basket-weighting of a new world currency based on Special Drawing Rights
issued by the International Monetary Fund. With the uncertainty affecting foreign
exchanges and exchange rates, such a move could add increased credibility to
the currency system. Bear in mind its price would be a reference point and
the move would not involve buying gold on the open market. However, with Bankers
so resistant to gold, its inclusion in the S.D.R. may be premature? If not,
we would then expect to see central bankers remove their dislike of gold completely
and let it find its own level.
Russia has been buying up gold for the last two years slowly but surely and
intends to raise the gold content of its reserves to 10%. By doing so it adds
action to intention on gold as part of their monetary system. The silent but
difficult to ignore presence of gold in so many central bank vaults tells us
that the return of gold in support of currencies may well be possible now?
With the U.S. still controlling the I.M.F. even the U.S. of A. may find such
an additional reserve currency acceptable. This would certainly diminish, over
time, the impact of the U.S. $'s swings on global foreign exchanges, on global
trade. With the Obama administration trying to fortify the I.M.F. at the meeting
of the Group of 20 now is a good time to launch the proposal and for adjustments
to the I.M.F. and the S.D.R. to be made. The I.M.F.'s view of gold continues
to be one of respect of a vital reserve asset, so there should be no barrier
provided it supports currencies and does not compete against it.
The
G-20 will only follow such a move if gold is needed to shore up confidence
in currencies, which is becoming abundantly clear to all now. Certainly, we
are not quite at that point at the moment. But how far away from that are we?
Should major currency crises begin gold will quickly become a very visible
anchor to investors be bought as such. This may force central banks to re-recognize
it as a stable foundation in extreme times.
So if the U.S. is prepared to take a lesser role in the I.M.F. it should gain
the support of the world and such structural changes to the global monetary
system would follow. Sadly, as national interests, not global ones, govern
international policies, we doubt whether the States would lessen its dominant
role, just yet. A little more pain may be needed first?
"The times, they are a changing".
The present I.M.F. view of gold: -
"Gold is an undervalued asset held by the I.M.F., and provides a fundamental
strength to its balance sheet. Gold holdings provide the I.M.F. with operational
maneuverability both as regards the use of its resources and through adding
credibility to its precautionary balances. In these respects, the benefits
of the I.M.F. 's gold holdings are passed on to the membership at large, to
both creditors and debtors. The I.M.F. should continue to hold a relatively
large amount of gold among its assets, not only for prudential reasons, but
also to meet unforeseen contingencies."
Gold Forecaster regularly covers all fundamental and Technical aspects
of the gold price in the weekly newsletter. To subscribe, please visit www.GoldForecaster.com.
|