April 22, 2009
More Goldman Sachs Secrets that Tim Geithner Might Not Share with You!
by Reggie Middleton
|
|
 |
|
Okay, this is going to be a quick and dirty review of Goldman's derivative
real estate and off balance sheet real estate exposure as is probably reflected
through their credit exposure as well.
| OTC Derivative Credit
Exposure ($ mn) |
| |
Feb-09 |
% of total |
Nov-09 |
% of total |
Credit Quality Deterioration? |
Comments |
| AAA/Aaa |
$15,387 |
15.6% |
$14,596 |
20.7% |
(5.10%) |
<--Very significant decrease in AAA exposure |
| AA/Aa2 |
$33,820 |
34.2% |
$24,419 |
34.7% |
(0.50%) |
<-- Decrease in AA exposure |
| A/A2 |
$25,291 |
25.6% |
$16,189 |
23.0% |
2.6% |
<-- Significant increase in A exposure |
| BBB/Baa2 |
$9,724 |
9.8% |
$6,558 |
9.3% |
0.5% |
<-- Increase in BBB exposure |
| BB/Ba2 or lower |
$13,354 |
13.5% |
$7,478 |
10.6% |
2.9% |
<-- Very significant increase in non-investment grade (junk) exposure |
| Unrated |
$1,236 |
1.3% |
$1,169 |
1.7% |
(0.40%) |
<-- Marginal decrease in small unrated exposure |
| Total |
$98,812 |
100.0% |
$70,409 |
100.0% |
|
|
Now, why would Goldman's OTC Credit Exposure be increasing and deteriorating
even as it has taken expensive emergency money from Warren Buffet and strings
attached TARP funds it is trying to pass on like a itchy veneral disease? You
would think they would be trying to get rid of this stuff versus stuffing the
balance sheet with it.
Exposure by
asset category |
($ bn) (a) |
(a)
% of Equity |
Incl in L3
(b) ($ bn) |
(b)
% of (a) |
(b)
% of Equity |
| Prime |
$12 |
29% |
$1.7 |
14% |
3.9% |
| Alt-A |
$5 |
12% |
$2.0 |
41% |
4.7% |
| Subprime |
$2 |
4% |
$0.9 |
49% |
2.1% |
| Total |
$19.1 |
45% |
$4.6 |
24% |
10.8% |
Hmmm! 16% of Goldman's equity is in Alt-A and subprime assets. Alt-a doesn't
look to good. Read this article thoroughly (The
banking backdrop for 2009 ), then let's move on - or we can just glance
at this chart.

The problem ahead: According to Fitch, of the nearly $200 bn of option
ARMs outstanding, roughly $29 bn of loans are expected to recast by 2009.
Of this $6.6 bn constitute 2004 vintage (that would be recast as a result
of completion of the end of five-year term in 2009) and $23 bn constitute
2005 and 2006 vintage loans that would recast early due to the 110% balance
cap limit.
Further an additional $67 bn is expected to recast in 2010 of which $37
bn belong to 2005 vintage (that would be recast as a result of completion
of the end of five-year term in 2010) and the balance $30 bn consist of 2006
and 2007 vintage loans that would be recast early due to the 110% balance
limit cap.
The potential average payment increase on the loans recast is 63%, representing
an additional $1,053 due each month on top of the current average payment
of $1,672. These large payment increases could cause delinquencies to increase,
and increase dramatically, after the recast. The fact that only 65% of
borrowers have elected (or are able) to make only minimum payments
underscores the magnitude of the potential problem. The potential payment
shock combined with the continuous deteriorating outlook for home prices
and lack of refinancing opportunities could be a negative cause of concern
for investors in Option ARM securities. Even more ominous, is pall cast
upon the banks that hold these assets and are additionally exposed to other
forms of consumer credit, ie. HELOCs, credit card debt and other unsecured
loans (remember the links from the Asset Securitization Crisis above).
Well, let's take a look at the composition of their other exposures...
This is the "other exposure" not included in VaR table. Notice which category
has the largest change...
$ mn |
10% Sensitivity |
|
| May-08 |
May-07 |
% Change |
| Trading Risk |
| Equity |
1,102 |
709 |
55% |
| Debt |
1,147 |
1,045 |
10% |
| |
| Non-trading Risk |
| SMFG |
0 |
130 |
-100% |
| ICBC |
262 |
205 |
28% |
| Other Equity |
1,224 |
591 |
107% |
| Debt |
637 |
277 |
130% |
| Real Estate |
1,369 |
497 |
175% |
| Surprise, Surprise!!! |
Other market risk
not included in VaR |
5,741 |
3,454 |
66% |
Hmmmm! Their biggest non-VaR risk is real estate, primarily commercial real
estate, but they have plenty of other juicy stuff as well. Let's bring back
those two graphs from the previous article:

Reference the CMBS exposure that Goldman has above (at no less than 14x leverage),
then reference this chart directly below.

Damn, that really looks like its going to hurt! Now, let's move on to the
Off Balance Sheet Assets for the last quarter of 2008.
Q4-08
| Unconsolidated VIE's ($ mn) |
VIE assets |
Maximum
loss exposure |
Maximum
loss as %
of assets |
|
|
| Mortgage CDOs |
13,061 |
5,858 |
45% |
Real estate
derivative sec |
| Corporate CDOs and CLOs |
8,584 |
1,079 |
13% |
| Real estate, credit-related and other investing |
26,898 |
3,366 |
13% |
Raw real estate
& credit sec. |
| Municipal bond securitizations |
111 |
111 |
100% |
| Other mortgage-backed |
0 |
0 |
0% |
| Other asset-backed |
4,355 |
1,084 |
25% |
| Power-related |
844 |
250 |
30% |
| Principal-protected notes |
4,516 |
4,353 |
96% |
| Total |
58,369 |
16,101 |
27.6% |
Hmmmm! $40 billion dollars in real estate related assets and nearly $9 billion
in loss exposure, and that's JUST THE OFF BALANCE SHEET EDITION! This begs
the question. If they have this much exposure off balance sheet, how much do
they have on balance sheet? Well, let's take a look-see...
| Balance as at November 30, 2008 |
| In US$ mn |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Netting and
Collateral |
Total |
| Commercial paper, certificates of deposit, time deposits
and otr money market instruments |
5,205 |
3,457 |
0 |
0 |
8,662 |
| U.S. govt, federal agency and sovereign obligations |
35,069 |
34,584 |
0 |
0 |
69,653 |
| Mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities |
0 |
6,886 |
15,507 |
0 |
22,393 |
| Bank loans |
0 |
9,882 |
11,957 |
0 |
21,839 |
| Corporate debt securities and other debt obligations |
14 |
20,269 |
7,596 |
0 |
27,879 |
| Equities and convertible debentures |
25,068 |
15,975 |
16,006 |
0 |
57,049 |
| Physical commodities |
0 |
513 |
0 |
0 |
513 |
| Derivative contracts |
24 |
256,412 |
15,124 |
(141,223) |
130,337 |
| Total |
65,380 |
347,978 |
66,190 |
(141,223) |
338,325 |
Now, if any of you are paying attention, you should be agasp in your chair.
Why in the hell does Goldman carry more real estate assets exposure off balance
sheet than on. Well, just take a look at those pretty graphs above. The answer
is self-evident! Then there is also the spate of current events that are bound
to make those commercial real estate credits worth a mint... Such as the nation's
second largest Commercial property owner filing bankruptcy last week (as I
made clear that they would fold in some form or fashion in 2007 - GGP
and the type of investigative analysis you will not get from your brokerage
house).
Long story short, if you are bullish on commercial real estate and CLOs, then
you may want to be bullish on Goldman. However, if you foresee any real estate
problems, then this heavily laden, heavily valued, publicly traded fixed income
and real estate hedge fund may not be seeing the best of days in the near to
medium term!
Must read, related content:
- The
Official Reggie Middleton Bank Stress Tests
- GGP
has finally filed Bankruptcy, Proving My Analysis to be On Point Over the
Course of 18 Months
- For
those that attempt to argue that short sellers are bad for the market,
I bring you GGP!
- More
on the Goldmans Sachs - GGP Connection
- Who
is the Newest Riskiest Bank on the Street?
- Warning: "What
you don't report in your balance sheet can screw the average investor"!
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|
|