|
With much fanfare this week, Congress and the Administration began a series
of actions designed to protect over-leveraged consumers from the high fees
imposed by credit card lenders. As with most other initiatives devised by government,
this policy will create a host of unintended consequences that will undermine
the benefit the program hopes to create.
Anyone who carries a credit card knows that billing practices have become
much more aggressive, punitive, and seemingly arbitrary over recent years.
Sadly, these fees have become one of the only means the companies can use to
compensate for the increasing defaults on their unsecured loans.
By mandating that the credit card companies lower their fees, the government
will severely hinder their tenuous profitability. In order to avoid bankruptcy,
the companies will have to deny credit to marginal borrowers, which would reverse
the "easy access" policies that have defined the industry over the last generation.
The resulting contraction in consumer credit will run contrary to current Administration
efforts to keep Americans spending. The horns of this dilemma are completely
missed in Washington.
In better times, when companies could make money from interest charged on
a high-performing loan book, companies could perhaps compete on better customer
service and transparency. Unfortunately, desperate times have called for desperate
measures. And rather than seek to break their reliance on credit through harsh
reductions in spending, many Americans have waded into the snake pit despite
the costs.
Among other things, Congress objects to credit card issuers raising interest
rates and cutting back on lines of credit for those borrowers deemed at heightened
risk of default. One practice, called "universal default", in which card issuers
take into account a cardholder's total liabilities, not just what is owed on
a single card, has drawn particular Congressional fire. In this system, delinquency
on one account will often affect rates charged on all accounts, even those
where the borrower is still current.
Also under scrutiny is the very concept of lenders raising rates on existing
balances to reflect heightened risks, despite the fact that their ability to
do so is spelled out in advance. The concept is similar to adjustable rate
mortgages, where borrowers initially get lower rates but face the possibility
of higher rates should circumstances change. Without the ability to raise rates,
lenders will have no choice but to charge much higher rates from the start.
The bottom line is that credit card lending is a very risky business. The
debts are unsecured and the probability of default is high, meaning big losses
should borrowers choose not to pay. In addition, should a borrower file for
bankruptcy, credit card debt is often the first to be discharged. Given the
risks, interest rates need to be very high to keep lenders in business.
One way to keep a lid on rates for those who do pay is for lenders to weed
out those most likely to default. This can be accomplished through higher rates.
Not only does this discourage riskier borrowers from taking on more debt, but
it gives lenders a bigger cushion to absorb losses. However, by interfering
with card issuers' attempts to better price risk and limit losses, the government
will reduce credit availability.
The securitization process, infamously associated with mortgage debt, has
also been utilized extensively with credit card debt and has greatly spurred
the growth of consumer credit. As a result of securitization, lenders were
able to immediately offload their loans to Wall Street, which repackaged and
sold them to investors around the world. In this way, credit card issuers became
more concerned with loan volume and less concerned with loan risk. However,
now that huge losses in credit card-backed bonds have reduced investor demand
(despite recent multi-billion dollar Fed purchases), card issuers need to hold
loans on their own books. Greater prudence is resulting.
Ironically, this is the one potential silver lining to this cloud. By making
credit card lending even riskier, this bill will actually make it harder for
consumers to get credit. Since excess consumer credit is part of the problem,
restricting that credit is part of the solution. However, while I approve of
the ends, it is certainly not justified by the means.
It would be preferable to simply allow markets to function. Higher losses
among credit card lenders and higher rates for credit card users would greatly
diminish both the availability and desirability of consumer credit. Fear of
losses and the absence of a secondary market to unload risk would force lenders
to more judiciously extend credit. Simultaneously, higher rates would reduce
the appeal of credit card debt, causing fewer Americans to partake.
These mechanisms would begin the painful process of weaning the nation from
its addiction to credit. Ironically, this is what President Obama has said
is necessary.
Of course, there is also a good chance that this silver lining will prove
a mirage. When the banks attempt to restrict credit as a result of their business
concerns, the government will most likely funnel more taxpayer "bailout" money
to banks to entice them to keep lending. In typical government fashion, rather
than letting market forces work, our government will force bad decisions on
companies and then subsidize resulting losses. Isn't this starting to sound
familiar?
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar, read my just released book "The
Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets." Click here to
order your copy now.
For a look back at how I predicted our current problems read my 2007 bestseller "Crash
Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and
preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best way
to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com.
Download Euro Pacific's free Special Report, "Peter Schiff's Five Favorite
Investment Choices for the Next Five Years", at http://www.europac.net/reports.asp.
Subscribe to our free, on-line investment newsletter, "The Global Investor" at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
And now watch the latest episode of Peter's new video blog, The Schiff Report,
at http://www.europac.net/videoblog.asp.
|