|
Below is an excerpt from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
26th April 2009.
The Effects of Inflation
The effects of monetary inflation are three-fold. First, it brings about an
unwarranted transfer of purchasing power (resources) to the creator of the
new money and/or the first user of the new money. Another name for this unwarranted
transfer is theft. Second, it has a NON-UNIFORM effect on prices, leading to
mal-investment and the wastage of resources. The huge amount of savings and
resources squandered in real-estate investments over the past several years
exemplifies the havoc that can result from monetary inflation and why its effects
cannot simply be counteracted at some later time by "withdrawing liquidity".
Third, it EVENTUALLY results in a broad-based increase in the prices of everyday
goods and services.
Almost everyone focuses on the third of these effects, but the greatest injustices
and economic problems result from the first two. The "Keynesians" and the "Monetarists",
for instance, are generally unaware of the first two effects. In their fatally
flawed views of the economic world, monetary inflation either doesn't matter
at all or doesn't matter unless/until it causes the CPI to rise.
Based on traditional lead times, the substantial monetary inflation that has
occurred over the past seven months probably won't start to become evident
in the prices of everyday goods and services until 2010. Furthermore and as
mentioned in previous TSI commentaries, the CPI will probably trend downward
throughout 2009. This will make the deflationists look right for the next few
quarters even though they will be wrong. They will be wrong because even while
prices decline, the inflation will be taking a heavy toll on the economy by
facilitating the transfer of resources to the government and to failed businesses.
The Keynesians argue that the monetary inflation won't be a problem because
the economy will remain weak due to "insufficient aggregate demand", but they
fail to realise that "insufficient aggregate demand" doesn't cause anything*
and that monetary inflation is one of the main reasons why the economy is destined
to remain weak.
We are far more bearish on economic growth and employment than the mainstream
economists who are predicting deflation, and yet we expect an upward trend
in the general price level to begin within 12 months. Our expectation is not
outlandish because economic weakness will not prevent a currency from losing
its purchasing power in response to substantial growth in its supply. In fact,
it's the other way round. The less stuff that gets produced by the economy
the greater will be the eventual decline in the currency's purchasing power
stemming from monetary inflation. Or, to put it another way, real economic
growth puts downward, not upward, pressure on the general price level, so during
periods when the economy is weak there will be greater potential for increasing
currency supply to bring about higher prices (after the usual 'confusing' lag,
of course). During 1933-1940, for example, the unemployment rate was stuck
in the 14%-20% range and yet prices trended upward in response to a moderate
increase in the money supply (the US Government/Fed couldn't increase the money
supply at will during this period due to the remaining vestiges of the Gold
Standard). Prices also trended upward in parallel with high unemployment during
the 1970s, again due to growth in the money supply.
The effects of monetary inflation will work their way through the economy
over the next few years, but the theft is happening right now. We suggest that
the deflationists stop going on about how the amount of money created 'out
of thin air' is small compared to the declines in asset and debt prices (and
thus encouraging the Fed to counterfeit money at an even faster pace), and
start emphasising the problems inherent in the inflation.
*Aggregate demand will never be "insufficient" until
everyone has everything they want, which means it will never be insufficient.
What Keynesian economists refer to as "insufficient aggregate demand" is
the increased tendency to save, and the corresponding reduced tendency to
spend, after savings have been obliterated on a grand scale due to the mal-investments
prompted by the preceding inflation-fueled boom. A fall in prices is one
of the ways the economy heals itself in the aftermath of an inflation-fueled
boom. Generating more inflation prevents the healing process from occurring.
Current Situation
Either through luck or skillful manipulation, the Fed has managed to bring
about a sizeable increase in the US money supply over the past seven months
while preventing the money supply growth rate from spiraling out of control.
At the beginning of this year there appeared to be a significant risk that
the monetary situation would spiral out of control, but things have since settled
down. For example, US M2 money supply is down by around $100B over the past
four weeks and is almost flat over the past 11 weeks, causing the year-over-year
M2 growth rate to drop back from 10% to 8% (we haven't re-calculated TMS, but
the TMS and M2 growth rates have tracked each other closely over the past several
months).
The year-over-year growth rate in the money supply is likely to resume its
upward trend over the coming months, though, because the Fed is likely to ramp-up
the rate at which it monetises bonds. In fact, such a ramp-up appears to be
underway in that the Fed monetised (purchased with newly created money) $75B
of mortgage-backed securities and $14B of Treasury Bonds during the week ended
22nd April.
We aren't offering a free trial subscription at this time, but
free samples of our work (excerpts from our regular commentaries) can be viewed
at: http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/freesamples.html.
|