|
On April 21, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the "vast majority" of
U.S. banks have more capital than needed.
"Currently, the vast majority of banks have more capital than they need to
be considered well capitalized by their regulators," Geithner said in testimony
to a congressional oversight panel on the government's financial rescue program.
Geithner's remarks come on the heels of a surge in reported quarterly profits
by the big banks.
One of these banks, Bank of America (BAC), the world's second largest in terms
of market capitalization, booked a first-quarter net income of $4.247 billion
- 6% more than it made in all of 2008.
So is this the turnaround Geithner et al. have been willing to beggar our
nation's future for?
Before calling your broker and placing a big order for bank stocks based on
all this "good" news, it might be prudent to answer a couple questions first.
For starters, just where did all this income come from? And has credit quality
really improved?
The answers to both can be found buried in a company press release bearing
the encouraging title "Bank of America Earns $4.2 Billion in First Quarter."
I'd like to draw your attention to the four most telling excerpts from this
release.
-
"Equity investment income includes a $1.9 billion pretax gain on the sale
of China Construction Bank (CCB) shares."
-
"Noninterest income included $2.2 billion in gains related to mark-to-market
adjustments on certain Merrill Lynch structured notes as a result of credit
spreads widening."
-
"Credit quality deteriorated further across all lines of business as housing
prices continued to fall and the economic environment weakened."
-
Nonperforming assets were $25.7 billion compared with $18.2 billion at
December 31, 2008 and $7.8 billion at March 31, 2008, reflecting the continued
deterioration in portfolios tied to housing."
Now we see that out of its $4.2 billion in profits, a total of $4.1 billion
came from a one-time sale of CCB stock and marking up Merrill's book of mortgages.
If you subtract these one-time gains from net income and include preferred
dividends, Bank of America actually lost $1.286 billion.
As far as credit quality goes, I think number 3 above makes the situation
as clear as can be.
Importantly, Bank of America is not the only big bank engaged in accounting
sleight of hand.
As The New York Times article "Bank Profits Appear Out of Thin Air" by
Andrew Ross Sorkin points out:
With Goldman Sachs, the disappearing month of December didn't quite disappear
(it changed its reporting calendar, effectively erasing the impact of a $1.5
billion loss that month); JP Morgan Chase reported a dazzling profit partly
because the price of its bonds dropped (theoretically, they could retire them
and buy them back at a cheaper price; that's sort of like saying you're richer
because the value of your home has dropped); Citigroup pulled the same trick.
So what's the takeaway?
When the Treasury secretary tells you banks are well capitalized and you read
in the press that financial institutions have turned a corner, don't buy it.
And don't buy the stocks of these companies either.
These days, smart investors are well advised to carefully watch the investment
as well as the political landscape... because Washington's movers and shakers'
influence on the markets has never been greater. The
Casey Report investigates and analyzes those influences and trends
- to find the best investing opportunities with maximum gains. You can try
it completely risk-free - check out our 3-month trial with 100% money-back
guarantee. Click
here to learn more.
|