May 05, 2009
And the Banks that Need to Raise Capital Are...
by Reggie Middleton
|
|
 |
|
I am now releasing the additional calculated capital requirements for several
banks, with the full set of calculations available for download for free
registered users. I am releasing my proprietary work to demonstrate to
those who do not currently subscribe to BoomBustBlog the depth and breadth
of this site's capabilities.
The Methodology Used
As stated in my original
release of the Sun Trust Stress Test Analysis, I don't necessarily agree
with the methodology and assumptions of the government's version of the stress
test. For one, they don't risk weight earnings, only assets. Some of the
investment banking operations take significant risks to generate earnings
(see "Goldman
Sachs Banking Secrets Mr. Geithner May Not Share With You!), and these
actions pose systemic risk. In addition, the bar is too low to be considered
truly stressful (eg. 8.4% average unemployment as a base case in an 8.5%
unemployment environment, trending upwards). I have rectified the problem
of floating government targets and expectations by creating a scenario analysis
that covers multiple assumptions, thus the readers can decide for themselves
which set of assumptions to use in order to arrive at what they feel would
be the government's (or the most realistic) conclusion.
The following is a summary of my simulated government stress tests based upon
the white paper released in the latter part of April 2009. See The
Supervisory Capital Assessment Program: Design and Implementation 2009-04-30
02:16:44 286.90 Kb and Bank
of Finland Recessionary Stress Testing Methodology 2009-04-30 02:18:39 306.64
Kb for methodology. For my personal accounts, I am assuming a 4% bar for
Tangible Common Equity and a 6% bar for Tier One Capital. The actual bars have
not been released publicly, to my knowledge. It has been stated in the media
and dated government documents that the base case government estimates for
unemployment was 8.4%. As previously mentioned, we believe that to be unrealistic
(given that the latest government figures show 8.5% unemployment and trending
upwards), hence we have used the more stringent RGE Monitor macro assumptions
for the base case scenario and have reserved what we perceive as the government's
stated parameters as the optimistic scenario.
Please be aware that these are illustrative analyses only, and we are not
privy to the same access and information that may have went into the government's
analysis of these companies. In addition, the government may have wavered from
the stated implementation in the whitepaper released above. All in all, I believe
this to be a fairly accurate representation of what one could expect from the
government in the upcoming days.
The Scenario Analysis Summary for PNC Bank
Capital to be Raised
Assuming the government requires a 4% minimum tangible equity capital ratio,
we foresee PNC being in need of roughly $3.25 billion of additional capital
causing approximately 18% in dilution among existing equity investors as of
the closing price of the 1st of this month.
| 2010 End |
base case - rge monitor |
Adverse case |
Optimistic case |
| Risk weighted Assets |
260,878 |
257,111 |
266,758 |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital |
27,948 |
27,125 |
28,802 |
| Tangible Assets |
285,435 |
281,138 |
292,144 |
| Tangible Equity |
8,299 |
7,476 |
9,153 |
| Tier One Capital |
10.7% |
10.6% |
10.8% |
| TEC |
2.91% |
2.66% |
3.13% |
| PNC Share price |
40.45 |
|
| |
Base Case
Scenario |
Min Tangible
Equity
Capital Ratio |
Capital
to be
raised
($ mn) |
TEC $ mn
(post add
capital ) |
Tangible
Assets
$ mn
(post add
cap) |
No of
shares
(mn) |
Dilution
Impact |
| 2010 estimates |
2.9% |
0 |
8,299 |
285,435 |
0.0 |
0.0% |
| |
3.0% |
272 |
8,571 |
285,708 |
6.7 |
1.5% |
| |
3.5% |
1,753 |
10,052 |
287,188 |
43.3 |
9.7% |
| |
4.0% |
3,249 |
11,547 |
288,684 |
80.3 |
18.0% |
| |
4.5% |
4,760 |
13,059 |
290,195 |
117.7 |
26.4% |
| |
5.0% |
6,287 |
14,586 |
291,723 |
155.4 |
34.9% |
| |
5.5% |
7,831 |
16,130 |
293,266 |
193.6 |
43.5% |
| |
6.0% |
9,391 |
17,690 |
294,826 |
232.2 |
52.2% |
| |
6.5% |
10,967 |
19,266 |
296,403 |
271.1 |
60.9% |
| |
7.0% |
12,561 |
20,860 |
297,996 |
310.5 |
69.8% |
Download the full analysis (as a
registered user) here: PNC
Simulated Government Stress Test 2009-05-05 02:00:10 1.12 Mb
The Scenario Analysis Summary for Morgan Stanley
Assuming the government requires a 4% minimum tangible equity capital ratio,
we foresee Morgan Stanley not being in need of additional capital as of the
closing price of the first of this month.
| 2010 End |
Base case |
Base Case |
Adverse case |
Optimistic case |
| Risk weighted Assets |
280,233 |
280,233 |
270,716 |
292,711 |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital |
40,374 |
40,374 |
37,110 |
43,846 |
| Tangible Assets |
659,107 |
659,107 |
636,618 |
688,597 |
| Tangible Equity |
28,965 |
28,965 |
25,701 |
32,437 |
| Tier One Capital |
14.4% |
14.4% |
13.7% |
15.0% |
| TEC |
4.39% |
4.39% |
4.04% |
4.71% |
| MS Share price |
23.07 |
|
| |
Base Case
Scenario |
Min
Tangible
Equity
Capital
Ratio |
Capital
to be
raised
($ mn) |
TEC $ mn
(post add
capital) |
Tangible
Assets
$ mn
(post add
cap) |
No of
shares
(mn) |
Dilution
Impact |
| 2010 estimates |
4.4% |
0 |
28,965 |
659,107 |
0.0 |
0.0% |
| |
4.5% |
728 |
29,693 |
659,835 |
31.5 |
2.9% |
| |
5.0% |
4,201 |
33,165 |
663,308 |
182.1 |
16.8% |
| |
5.5% |
7,710 |
36,675 |
666,817 |
334.2 |
30.9% |
| |
6.0% |
11,257 |
40,222 |
670,364 |
488.0 |
45.1% |
| |
6.5% |
14,842 |
43,807 |
673,949 |
643.3 |
59.5% |
| |
7.0% |
18,465 |
47,430 |
677,572 |
800.4 |
74.0% |
Download the full analysis (as a
registered user) here: MS
Simulated Government Stress Test 2009-05-05 02:17:35 2.49 Mb
The Scenario Analysis Summary for Sun Trust Bank
Assuming the government requires a 4% minimum tangible equity capital ratio,
we foresee Sun Trust being in need of roughly $1.5 billion of additional capital
causing approximately 31.7% in dilution among existing equity investors, as
of the closing price of the first of this month.
| 2010 End |
Base Case |
Adverse case |
Optimistic case |
| Risk weighted Assets |
152,937 |
150,791 |
155,063 |
| Tier 1 risk-based capital |
13,653 |
12,358 |
14,959 |
| Tangible Assets |
165,245 |
162,825 |
167,642 |
| Tangible Equity |
5,121 |
3,826 |
6,427 |
| Tier One Capital |
8.9% |
8.2% |
9.6% |
| TEC |
3.10% |
2.35% |
3.83% |
| Sun Trust Share price |
13.71 |
|
| |
Base Case
Scenario |
Min
Tangible
Equity
Capital
Ratio |
Capital
to be
raised
($ mn) |
TEC $ mn
(post add
capital) |
Tangible
Assets
$ mn
(post add
cap) |
No of
shares
(mn) |
Dilution
Impact |
| 2010 estimates |
3.1% |
0 |
5,121 |
165,245 |
0.0 |
0.0% |
| |
3.5% |
687 |
5,808 |
165,931 |
50.1 |
14.0% |
| |
4.0% |
1,551 |
6,672 |
166,796 |
113.1 |
31.7% |
| |
4.5% |
2,424 |
7,545 |
167,669 |
176.8 |
49.6% |
| |
5.0% |
3,307 |
8,428 |
168,551 |
241.2 |
67.6% |
| |
5.5% |
4,198 |
9,319 |
169,443 |
306.2 |
85.9% |
| |
6.0% |
5,100 |
10,221 |
170,345 |
372.0 |
104.3% |
| |
6.5% |
6,011 |
11,132 |
171,255 |
438.4 |
122.9% |
| |
7.0% |
6,931 |
12,052 |
172,176 |
505.6 |
141.7% |
I have made the full 36 page report available for all to download here: Sun
Trust Banks Simulated Government Stress Test 2009-05-04 13:38:04 1019.01
Kb.
I will follow up with Stress Tests for Goldman Sachs and American Express
tomorrow. Stay tuned...
For those who do not know or follow me, I have a strong track record in calling
this credit crisis:
- The Commercial Real Estate Implosion: I called it in 2007 - "GGP
has finally filed Bankruptcy, Proving My Analysis to be On Point Over the
Course of 18 Months".
- The Investment Bank Implosions: Bear Stearns (Is
this the Breaking of the Bear? [Sunday, 27 January 2008]) - and - Lehman
Brothers investment banking/CRE implosion connection (Is
Lehman really a lemming in disguise? [Thursday, 21 February 2008])
- The Mortgage Banking Implosion: I called it in 2004, publicly on the blog
in 2007 - Countrywide and Washington Mutual (Yeah,
Countrywide is pretty bad, but it ain’t the only one at the subprime
party… Comparing Countrywide with its peer)
- The Regional Bank Implosion: Spring of 2008 - nearly all of the failed
or failing regional banks of significant size (As
I see it, these 32 banks and thrifts are in deep doo-doo!)
- The Monoline Implosion: 2007-2008 - MBIA (A
Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by Reggie
Middleton) and Ambac (Ambac
is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More than $8 Billion of Losses
with Just a $2.26 Billion Market Cap and Follow
up to the Ambac Analysis), among others including the residential homebuilders
and their abuse of off balance sheet JVs - well in advance.
I suggest everybody read up on how we got here. I started taking defensive
action in 2004, and implemented my offensive actions 2007 - right around the
time this blog was started. Read my blog by blow analysis...
Recommended Reading - The Asset Securitization Crisis:
- Intro:
The great housing bull run - creation of asset bubble, Declining lending
standards, lax underwriting activities increased the bubble - A comparison
with the same during the S&L crisis
- Securitization
- dissimilarity between the S&L and the Subprime Mortgage crises, The
bursting of housing bubble - declining home prices and rising foreclosure
- Counterparty
risk analyses - counter-party failure will open up another Pandora's box (must
read for anyone who is not a CDS specialist)
- The
consumer finance sector risk is woefully unrecognized, and the US Federal
reserve to the rescue
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part I
- Municipal
bond market and the securitization crisis - part 2 (should be read
by whoever is not a muni expert - this newsbyte
may be worth reading as well)
- An
overview of my personal Regional Bank short prospects Part I: PNC Bank
- risky loans skating on razor thin capital, PNC addendum Posts One and Two
- Reggie
Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure
redux
- More
on the banking backdrop, we've never had so many loans!
- As
I see it, these 32 banks and thrifts are in deep doo-doo!
- A
little more on HELOCs, 2nd lien loans and rose colored glasses
- Will
Countywide cause the next shoe to drop?
- Capital,
Leverage and Loss in the Banking System
- Doo-Doo bank drill
down, part 1 - Wells Fargo
- Doo-Doo
Bank 32 drill down: Part 2 - Popular
- Doo-Doo
Bank 32 drill down: Part 3 - SunTrust Bank
- The
Anatomy of a Sick Bank!
- Doo
Doo Bank 32 Drill Down 1.5: Wells Fargo Bank
- GE:
The Uber Bank???
- Sun Trust Forensic
Analysis
- Goldman Sachs Snapshot:
Risk vs. Reward vs. Reputations on the Street
- Goldman Sachs Forensic
Analysis
- American Express:
When the best of the best start with the shenanigans, what does that mean
for the rest..
- Part
one of three of my opinion of HSBC and the macro factors affecting it
- The
Big Bank Bust
- Continued
Deterioration in Global Lending, Government Intervention in Free Markets
- The
Butterfly is released!
- Global
Recession - an economic reality
- The
Banking Backdrop for 2009
- Reggie
Middleton on the Irish Macro Outlook
Recommended Global Macro Reading from Guest Contributors:
- Debt
- Thoughts On A Global Problem (Part 1),
- Banking
out of Control (Part 2)
- Global
Debt Stats (Part 3)
Related Articles/Posts
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|
|