|
A baseline overview and a psychological, political, and historical approach
regarding the emerging gold bull market
Part II of XI
GENERAL MARKET CHARACTERISTICS OF GOLD
HALF TRUTH?
One often hears that gold does better in deflation than inflation. This is
a half-truth. By definition, under the gold standard that existed throughout
most of the 1800's, gold must do well in a price deflationary environment.
After all, if prices are dropping, and gold remains pegged to the dollar, and
one dollar remains one dollar, logically what else can happen? However, once
gold was un-pegged to the dollar and became increasingly demonetized in the
20th century, its price behavior relative to inflation, deflation, and commodities
became increasingly erratic. The situation becomes even more complicated given
that the terms "inflation" and "deflation" have very different meanings and
imply different policies for different economists.
A few paragraphs down I begin my discussion of various forms of "good" and "bad" inflation
and deflation. "Goodness" and "badness," is meant relative to a laissez faire
or "bottom up" approach to economics commonly referred to as the "Austrian
School." I agree in principle with the Austrian
School that when we search for truth, there should be no philosophical "disconnect" between
the "bottom up" fundamentalist principles of microeconomics that apply to small
businesses and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the national
macroeconomic policies practiced by government and central banks. Therefore,
the Austrian school provides an invaluable perspective that I return to repeatedly
in increasing detail throughout this series.
The late Dr. Roy W. Jastram of UC Berkeley published a now out-of-print landmark
study of gold price behavior titled The Golden Constant - The English and American
Experience 1560-1976. Franklin
Sander, a Tennessee-based gold dealer, posted data from his book on the
Internet. In addition, I have supplemented his data with additional data and
commentary (provided by the time periods covered by hyperlinks) by market strategist Dan
Ascani (designated as "DA").
| Inflation |
Deflation |
Commodities |
Silver |
Gold |
| 1808-1814 |
|
+58% |
-33% |
-37% |
| |
1814-1830 |
-50% |
+89% |
.+100% |
| 1843-1857 |
|
+48% |
-30% |
-33% |
| 1861-1864 |
|
+117% |
-53% |
-6% |
| |
1864-1897 |
-65% |
+27% |
+40% |
| 1897-1920 |
|
+232% |
-49% |
-70% |
| |
(DA) 1920-1933 |
-69% |
|
+251% |
| |
1929-1933 |
-31% |
-5% |
+44% |
| 1933-1951 |
|
+168% |
-4% |
-37% |
| 1951-1979 |
|
+158% |
+380% |
+240% |
| |
|
|
|
|
| (DA) 1933-1997 |
|
+1013% |
|
+51% |
Dr. Jastram felt his data demonstrated a "retrieval phenomenon" where "gold
prices do not chase after commodities; commodity prices return to the index
value of gold over and over." He demonstrated that for short time periods,
gold, commodities, and inflation do not necessarily move together, although
he concluded that gold has maintained its value in terms of real purchasing
power in the very long run. His data also shows how gold tended to do well
in periods of deflation during the era of the gold standard.
The stagflationary 1970's provide an important precedent in recent American
financial history, particularly since I believe the decade ahead will echo
the 1970's, only worse. After Nixon removed the dollar from the $35 an ounce
international exchange rate in 1971, gold began a run up that culminated at
a London PM fix of $850 an ounce Jan 21, 1980. This might be interpreted as
a variation of Dr. Jastram's "catch-up" theme. As a prelude, broad money supply
growth (M3) had increased to around 10% a year during much of the Johnson administration
(Nov 1963-Jan 1969) and the Nixon years (Jan 1969-August 1974). In the mid
to late 1960's the Fed kept a lid on the price of internationally-traded gold
during an episode called "The London Gold Pool" in which it sold off U.S. gold
reserves as part of a campaign to help keep inflation indicators suppressed
while Johnson was simultaneously funding the Great Society programs and the
Vietnam War. Eventually the lid blew off of government and Fed intervention.
More on this in Part IX, "The Leviathan State: From Consolidation to Excess."
It is also worth noting that the period from 1951-1979, not to mention most
of the other economic periods provided in the chart above, actually consisted
of several distinct economic phases that need to be analyzed in detail before
one can draw rigorous conclusions. The data is provided here simply to help
provide an intuitive overview.
To get a sense of how different phases of the business cycle impact on the
price of gold, we must first disentangle the very different and often confusing
meanings of the terms inflation and deflation that are bandied
about by the government and national media.
The
Honorable Humpty Dumpty: "When I use a word, it means just what I choose
it to mean -neither more nor less." Alice responded: "The question is whether
you can make words mean so many different things." The Hon. Humpty Dumpty
replied: "The question is, which is to be master -that's all."
INFLATION AND DEFLATION,
THE "GOOD" AND "BAD" FORMS OF EACH
Bad inflation. This type of inflation typically means an expansion
of the money supply and bank credit ahead of gains from productivity and asset
growth. More money and credit chasing fewer goods and services typically means
higher prices over the long run.
The public often thinks that light to moderate bad inflation is good for the
overall economy both in the short term and the long term. It usually thinks
that any degree of bad inflation from its inception is automatically good for
gold. Both beliefs are demonstrably false in many if not most cases.
Government and central bank spokesmen typically call this good inflation.
They claim that credit expansion and government deficit spending "stimulus" helps
to generate full employment and full capacity utilization. This in turn supposedly
generates additional earnings and economic growth that offset any increased
indebtedness and long-term price inflation.
From their "top down" macroeconomic vantage point, this is definitely good
inflation to the extent that it allows government and Fed officials to create
money and bank credit out of thin air and spend heavily without the aggravation
of overtly raising taxes and receiving immediate negative political blowback.
One reason why this is really bad inflation is because it results in an eventual
loss in real purchasing power for the average consumer. This is a hidden form
of taxation. Creating more money and credit per se does not in itself create
any new wealth any more than a counterfeiting ring. The act of simply increasing
spending and the process of creating more useful goods and services in a balanced
economy are usually two very different things. "Stimulus" spending typically
creates the short-term illusion of prosperity at the long-term price of distorting
the economy and debauching the currency.
In the short run, the price inflationary impact of new money and credit is
usually muted and ignored by most investors. One reason often involves governmental
deceit. The article "They Are Lying to Us Again," archived at www.jimrogers.com describes
how government can selectively edit and misrepresent statistics.
Price inflation may also remain initially muted because excess liquidity can
first find its way into stock, real estate, or bond asset bubbles. It may experience
a prolonged delay in running up commodity and consumer prices.
Lastly, price inflation has been reduced because the dollar has served as
a global reserve currency since World War II. Dollars currently comprise around
68% of global reserves. Foreign banks and trade surplus partners have been
willing to sop up excess dollars for their own reserve needs or to try to humor
the "last remaining global superpower."
Gold has historically been slow to react to the initial onset of bad inflation.
A likely reason is that the first waves of broad money supply and credit growth
(M3) tend to give a false impression of economic health. M3 growth may take
longer than a year to begin to show up in price increases for consumer goods.
In the initial phase of this cycle, banks acquire more deposits, and in turn
have more money to lend. Spending increases, corporate earnings may rise, and
the stock market may be spurred on by accelerated business activity.
As business activity picks up, the Fed may hike interest rates ostensibly
to "cool the economy" while insisting that it has inflation tightly under control.
Higher bond yields look even more attractive relative to gold bullion, which
pays no interest.
So-called "bond vigilantes" at major investment firms may insist that the
free market is raising bond yields at the "whiff of inflation," and this in
itself is adequate to help cut back excessive monetary growth. The public usually
buys off on this, and ignores the fact that investment houses have their own
axes to grind.
Investment firms typically want to avoid "unnecessarily" scaring their fixed
income clients into another asset class such as gold that could help dry up
their bond business. Their bond departments are usually major profit centers.
Investment firms often use the attractiveness of bonds for conservative investors
as a means to open up new accounts and build up their asset base.
Elderly people, who control a major portion of this country's wealth, tend
to perceive gold and other commodities as volatile and risky. It is not uncommon
for an elderly person to shop long hours among brokers to get an extra 50 to
75 basis points in bond yields. He may need to be almost hit over the head
with very strong gold trend evidence and very bad inflation news before switching
over to gold. We may be talking about the kind of person who is becoming increasingly
reluctant to drive at night.
In Part X of this series I discuss evidence supplied by the Gold Anti-Trust
Action committee that major investment firms have other conflicts of interest.
As two examples, they have apparently been in bed with the Fed through the
repurchase agreement market that provides backup support for them to manipulate
certain markets. They also need to retain access to Long Term Capital Management-type
Fed bailouts to deal with the high
risks entailed by their very profitable hedge fund clients.
Adam Hamilton charts the short term paradox where a rise in interest rates
can hurt gold in the short run in his July 20, 2001 article "Real
Rates and Gold." In the long run, higher interest rates should coincide
with rising real inflation, and motivate people to buy more gold as a hedge
against inflation. However, in the short run, if people think that interest
rate increases are not part of a sustainable rising trend, they may sell off
their gold and drive it lower and jump into bonds to try to capture higher
yields. Once it becomes more obvious that inflation is very real, is rising,
and is no longer containable, then gold starts moving up along with long-term
interest rates. But that usually comes very late in the bad inflation cycle.
Fraud Note: Usually government and central bank authorities
never admit that spending stimulus and credit expansion is "inflationary," in
fact, quite the opposite, even though M3 growth may already be showing an upward
diagonal line on the money
supply charts for a number of years. Inflation is always politically unpopular,
and politicians typically have to be dragged kicking and screaming to admit
to it. In addition, government tends to be a heavy borrower, and does not want
to hike its own interest rate burden. Nor it is anxious to index upwards retirement,
Social Security, and other transfer payments in the social welfare state. Nor
does it want to excite union members and other workers into hiking wage demands.
To the contrary, inflation has always been the government's sneaky way of dropping
real wages to bring the labor supply and employer demand curves in alignment
and increase employment while pretending to be "doing something" to stimulate
the economy and boost wages.
According to "Austrian" economists, the short-term illusion of heightened
economic health created by the "stimulus" spending equivalent of a "counterfeiting
ring" has other negative ramifications. M3 growth creates false pricing signals
that can seriously distort the economy and undermine entrepreneurial calculation
and capital formation. "Austrians" argue that artificial stimulus and artificially
low interest rates encourage speculative and wasteful economic activity precisely
at that time in the classical economic cycle when the write-down of bad debt
and more savings and more prudent investment are required. "Stimulus" tends
to help sweep underlying problems under the rug where they may fester and grow
larger.
But even worse than false pricing signals and governmental deceit, however,
is the ability of the Fed and US Treasury to actively engage in interventions
that further distort and compromise the free market. According to the Gold
Anti Trust Action Committee (GATA), the
Fed has orchestrated central bank dishoarding to artificially suppress gold
to create the illusion of low inflation. GATA also believes that through the
repurchase agreement market, the Fed has induced its Wall Street allies to
use the gearing of futures contracts to suppress the price of gold and silver
even further. As previously mentioned, bullion dealer Blanchard & Co. has
filed a $2 billion law suit alleging that J.P. Morgan Chase and Barrick colluded
in an artificial gold price suppression scheme.
Good inflation: Since I am discussing opposing concepts, I necessarily
have to mention "good inflation" to complement the aforementioned discussion
of "bad inflation." The only problem is that I have never seen anyone discuss
such as thing as "good inflation" in this context. At the risk of sounding
academic, "good inflation" could mean adding new assets to the system (asset "inflation" in
the sense of asset accretion or asset accumulation) while keeping the money
supply roughly the same, such as doubling the land mass of the U.S. for nominal
cost under the Louisiana Purchase or adding more manufactured goods without
raising prices due to enhanced production methods. These accretions tend to
drive down average prices while adding tangible wealth and would tend to have
the same positive impact as good deflation mentioned later.
Bad Deflation: This is the kind of environment where gold often outshines
all other asset classes, and merits extended discussion. This is the overall
underlying environment I believe we have been in since the Nasdaq top in March
2000, and it could last for many more years. But first some background on the
bizarre situation that currently exists with both the gold market and the stock
market.
Bad deflation is typically the back-side of the aforementioned bad inflation
cycle, where over-inflated asset prices created by excessive "stimulus" start
coming down. As discussed in my paper "Amidst
Bullish Hoopla: A Behind the Curtain Look at Fed Desperation and Intervention
Wizardry," where I describe stock market overvaluation in more detail, the
Fed has been fearful that if the stock market bubble starts deflating too quickly,
this could lead to a negative wealth effect, reduce consumer confidence and
spending, undermine bank collateral, dramatically increase bankruptcies and
unemployment, and risk a depression. However, by dropping the Federal Funds
rate down to 1% and by gunning the money pump by about 10% a year over the
past few years to stave off asset bubble deflation, the Fed has risked creating
more bubbles elsewhere, such as in the real estate and bond markets. This money
supply growth has been showing up in rising consumer prices. This is the type
of inflation that the Fed and US Government try to ignore. Hence, we are now
simultaneously experiencing consumer price inflation while witnessing overvalued
stock, bond, and real estate markets that threaten serious deflation.
As a response to the Fed's alleged anti-deflation activities (and related
factors), the S&P 500 has risen about 43% since March 2003. Conversely,
as a response to fears about long-term inflation (and related factors), the
un-hedged gold stock index (HUI) has climbed over 500% in the last three years
in a "stealth bull market" that most Wall Street firms have downplayed.
Historically the gold market and the stock market have been negatively correlated.
Rising long-term inflation is usually very good for gold, and very bad for
the stock market. The bullish activity of both markets may be signaling two
completely different outlooks for the US economy.
Negative real interest rates are usually a crucial factor in
a bad deflation cycle to account for the out-performance of gold. Negative
real interest rates mean that the rate of real inflationary erosion in purchasing
power from the long-term impact of the underlying growth of M3 is greater than
the nominal interest rates one can get from CDs at the bank. Although Americans
have been in a negative real interest rate environment since at least the mid-
1990's, it has become particularly dramatic since the Fed reduced the Federal
Funds rate down to 1% by summer 2003 while maintaining broad money base (M3)
growth in the 8-10% a year range.
An important cause of negative interest rates is central bank intervention.
Let us compare how interest rates set by the Fed may differ from those that
might be created by a free market. The Fed has dropped its Federal Funds rate
to a 45 year low of one percent to ostensibly stimulate the economy to avoid
a collapse of puffed-up asset prices. The Thirty Year Treasury bond hovered
around 4.9% as of mid Jan 2004. In my Amidst Bullish Hoopla article, I discuss
how hedge funds can work with the Fed and allied Wall Street firms to transmit
lowered interest rates out the yield curve with the bond carry trade. Also,
the Fed can use Open Market Operations to buy bonds to prop up bond prices
and drive interest rates down, often by making purchases with money created
out of thin air that ultimately create a hidden tax on the average American.
Contrast all of this with M3 growth, a truer indicator of real long-term inflation.
This has been growing between 7%-10% a year since 1995. Let's say 8% on average.
If the free market were to price a bond, it would probably take into account
this truer long term inflation rate, and add on top of that a risk premium
of let's say a historical average of around 2.50% . That gives us 10.5% as
a rational hurdle rate for setting a free market floor on expected interest
rates. Now, let's deduct the aforementioned Thirty Year Treasury rate of 4.9%,
and we get a possible real negative interest rate of 5.6%. For individuals
in money market funds that pay less than 1%, the negative spread could be over
9.5%.
Gold, which pays no interest but has the potential to appreciate, starts to
look very attractive compared to the negative real rates of return on bonds,
CDs, and money market funds. Better yet for gold, if interest rates eventually
go up, the resale value of bonds will come down, giving bond investors double
black eyes. They will lose both from their low rate of current interest income
combined with capital losses on the reduced resale value of their bond holdings.
(When interest rates go up, bond resale values go down). Conversely, to the
extent that rising long term interest rates signal rising long term inflation,
this becomes another plus for gold. Last, but not least, once investors sense
that stocks have peaked and may be set for a price decline (deflation), gold
and other "commodities" begin to look relatively more attractive. We live in
era of central bank and government intervention whose continuous stimulus efforts
to arrest asset price deflation are likely to add inflation to the pro-gold
story.
There is evidence that markets may tend to be inefficient in adjusting to
an environment of continually rising interest rates. British economist Prof.
Tim G. Congdon noted in his WGC
research study no. 28: "As the double-digit annual inflation rates of the
1970s came as a shock to savers, it took them time to catch up with the new
investment paradigm. Interest rates lagged behind inflation and real interest
rates became negative, creating the ideal conditions for rising prices of gold
and other so-called "hard assets" (oil, real estate, commodities)."
Fraud note: From the Austrian viewpoint, bad inflation cannot
go on forever, even as a way to stave off bad deflation. Bad inflation stimulates
speculative mal-investment, excessive debt, and asset bubbles that distort
the economic system while debauching the currency. The economy may become so
distorted that new waves of money only generate stagnation and inflation ("stagflation"),
analogous to a drug addict whose fixes start breaking down the body. Since
summer 2003 the M3 growth and money velocity charts have been tapering off,
partly because the system is getting so saturated with cheap credit that the
Fed is beginning to push on a string. Also, a debauched currency may trigger
a currency crisis (a rapid exchange rate slide) that can cause foreign imports
(10% of US GDP) to become more expensive and contribute towards prolonged malaise.
Austrians believe that often the best thing to do is simply leave the economy
alone and allow the free market to sort things out. Go ahead and let asset
bubbles deflate on their own. After a period of brief but intense pain from
bankruptcies and collapsing prices, entrepreneurs and other bargain hunters
typically step in, reshuffle assets into more productive enterprises, and economic
growth will start again. That actually happened in America during the Martin
Van Buren administration (1836-1840) that experienced a sharp stock market
correction and a money supply contraction of 30%, somewhat similar to the first
two years of the Great Depression beginning in 1929. The US Government actually
reduced its spending during this period, and the economy turned around at the
end of the painful two years. (c.f. Dr. Jeffrey Hummel, "Martin
Van Buren: What Greatness Really Means"). In contrast, the Great Depression
dragged on from 1929 to the 1940's despite the Hoover administration interventions
and FDR's New Deal. Dr. Murray Rothbard claims in America's
Great Depression that government intervention actually served to prolong
and deepen the Depression, and in fact created a second depression within the
Depression.
I consider the aforementioned two paragraphs a "fraud note" under the theory
that many senior government and banking officials in America are aware of all
of this, but are afraid to educate the public for fear that this could lead
to the curtailment of pork spending and central banking special privileges
that I describe in Parts VIII and IX about the history of gold in America.
Good Deflation: This involves price level declines from improved
efficiencies and from asset accretions. The money supply is held relatively
constant. Earlier I discussed how the Industrial Revolution helped drive down
prices while Britain was on the gold standard. It helped double the purchasing
power of the British Pound over a one hundred year period. When currency is
pegged to gold, price deflation must by definition be good for gold. Today
we see another dramatic example of good deflation in the computer chip industry
in which computing power has steadily declined in price in accordance with "Moore's
Law."
America is also experiencing a form of price "deflation" from low cost imports
from Asia, which actually retard the rise in American consumer prices. I hesitate
to label this "good" deflation because of many complicating issues. The theory
of international free trade is supposed to enhance the wealth and prosperity
for all parties involved, and not result in the lopsided situation we see in
America today with a serious loss in its jobs and its manufacturing base and
a dangerous rise in debt. (A worthy discussion of these issues would require
another paper).
Most countries today inflate their money supply at much faster rates than
productivity gains. This submerges the gradual accretive effects of good deflation
on the price action of gold. The big moves in gold prices usually pertain to
other factors such as the deflationary side of business cycles, central bank
interventions, fears of runaway inflation, and changes in currency exchange
rates.
HOW GOLD REACTS TO CHANGES IN THE DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE
In August 2003, Newmont Mining President Pierre Lassonde commented: ""Eighty
percent of the variability of the gold price is due to the U.S. currency valuation.
So where the dollar is going is the key determinant of the U.S. dollar gold
price. And when you look at the structural imbalances in the U.S. today, they
are no different than they were 12 months ago -- in fact they are worse,"
A decline in the dollar can help create a rising floor underneath the price
of gold due to an arbitrage principle often referred to as the "Law
of One Price." This can apply to other high unit value, highly transportable
goods in addition to gold.
Here is an example of how it might work: Suppose that $1 US dollar equals
1 unit of Foreign Currency (FC). Imagine that ounce of gold sells for US $400.
An ounce also sells for FC 400 units. Now suppose as a result of a dollar slide,
US $2 now equals FC 1 unit, but the gold price has not changed in the US or
in the foreign country. I can now buy an ounce of gold for US $400 in the US,
sell that gold at an FC bank for FC 400 units, and then swap the FC 400 units
for US $800. By repeating this all day long, I would put upward pressure on
the price of gold in US dollars, downward pressure on gold in foreign units,
and upward pressure on the value of the $US, causing a decline in the $/FC
unit conversion rate.
The formula for the arbitrage is: $/ounce of gold = $/FC unit * FC unit/ounce
of gold.
If we keep FC/ounce of gold constant, and increase the $/FC ratio because
of a slide in the value of the dollar relative to FC units, then $/ounce of
gold in the U.S. is likely to go up.
According to gold analyst Paul
Van Eeden, currency exchanges changes are more likely to drag gold along
than gold prices changes are likely to impact on currency conversion rates.
This is because the gold market is relatively small compared to the gargantuan
size of currency markets.
While currency exchange movements may have a high correlation with short to
intermediate term gold price swings, they do not explain how the price of gold
gets calibrated in the first place before the currency change effects kick
in. My history of gold in America in Parts VII to IX should give the reader
a better sense of how the baseline value of gold can dramatically decline as
the banking system reduces its gold reserve requirements and engages in other "demonetization" processes.
In addition, currency traders arbitrage against a wide basket of goods, and
not just gold alone. Finally, it may be hard to distinguish between how movements
in gold prices and currency exchange rates may relate to psychological expectancy
effects among traders (also known as a "self-fulfilling prophecy") as opposed
to mathematical relationships based on hard fundamentals.
Analyst Clive Maund has
noted that gold has tended to go sideways or slightly down in foreign currencies
such as the Euro, South African Rand, and in Australian and New Zealand dollars
as they have appreciated while the dollar index has declined
dramatically over the last two years. They have indicated a weak but not
insignificant "Law of One Price" relationship.
Many gold gurus have noted that the rise in the price of gold denominated
in US dollars in the last two years has actually reflected a dollar bear market
rather than a real gold bull market. Rick Rule,
President of Global Resource Investments Ltd, observes that gold is the only
form of money that does not have an inflationary constituency. Currently all
of the major industrialized nations of the world, including Switzerland, are
debauching their currencies to maintain export competitiveness relative to
the U.S. The next major phase of a true gold bull market will probably take
place when gold starts moving up against all the major currencies of the world
as countries continue the game of "beggar thy neighbor.".
To better understand currency exchange movements, it is helpful
to disentangle their short term, intermediate term, and long term causes. There
are many different causes behind a slide in the US dollar than may not be directly
related gold, but nevertheless may get transmitted into a rising gold price
through the so-called "Law of One Price" arbitrage.
In the short run, currency exchange rates tend to be heavily
influenced by investment capital flows. Back in 2000 America received capital
inflows in the area of around two
to three billion dollars a day from foreigners. One important factor was
a desire to participate in the 1995-2000 stock market mania. Anther important
factor was a belief by foreign investors that the dollar would continue to
remain strong relative to other currencies, and not fall and hurt the value
of their non-repatriated US investments. Lastly, many countries have been willing
to continue investing their trade surplus dollars in US securities to stay
in the good graces of the world's "last remaining superpower."
The US stock and bond markets remain a risky bet that foreigners will continually
hold rather than eventually bolt for the door. The S&P index is trading
at a P/E multiple that is more than twice its historic average. Its reported
or "pro forma" earnings are often twice "real" (or GAAP or core) earnings,
as noted in my article "Bear
Case Overview." Also, bond interest rates, at 45 year lows, seem to have
nowhere to go but up. A Forbes magazine charticle "Here
We Go Again" suggests that the US market could still be mimicking the early
phases of the Japanese market of the 1990's. If the secular bear market that
may have begun in March 2000 returns, it could scare foreigners into selling
off their US securities and put further downward pressure on the dollar.
In the intermediate term, exchange rates tend to fall in line
with the Purchase Power Parity concept. The Economist Magazine's Big
Mac Index uses the Big Mac hamburger, representative of a basic consumer
item sold in over 118 countries as a rough yardstick to help calibrate relative
currency under-valuations or overvaluations. In 2002 it signaled that the dollar
was very overvalued. Li Lian Ong, Senior Analyst at Macquarie Bank, has authored The
Big Mac Index. According to the Amazon.com review of her book, the
index "...Could have been used to predict the Asian Currency Crisis and the
Mexican Peson stand-off where more traditional economic measures failed."
In the long run relative currency valuations relate to different
rates of productivity gains and different levels of monetary discipline of
different countries. They bear a rough analogy to relative values of shares
of stocks in companies, in which inflation is similar to stock dilution and
rising debt is bad (to include trade deficits) if it increases at a faster
rate than sustainable earnings growth (analogous to GDP growth). Professor
Tim Congdon, Director and Chief Economist of the economics consultancy Lombard
Street Research in London, published World Gold Council Research
Study 28 in 2002 which he modeled such factors as debt to GDP ratios, interest
rates, and growth rates for the US. He cites three reports predicting the strong
possibility of a serious currency slide (more on this later), and asked whether
the US could make the Herculean shift of 5% of GDP to exports fast enough to
halt deteriorating balance of trade and indebtedness trends.
The fundamental outlook for the US remains negative in this area. The declining
dollar is likely to have only a marginal impact in correcting America's balance
of trade problems. America has lost about half its manufacturing jobs in the
last thirty years and is addicted to foreign goods, plus certain foreign producers
such as China and Japan loosely devalue or peg in line with the dollar decline
to maintain their export competitiveness. There is no credible evidence that
the Federal Government can rein in runaway spending on any level, be it military
or social, and is arguably already bankrupt (discussed in more detail in Part
V). Fed Governor Ben Bernanke has announced that the Fed is prepared to inflate
without limit to smooth over problems. Asian demand is putting steady upward
pressure on commodity prices, which will likely squeeze American incomes. China
is becoming increasingly capable of fueling its growth in Asia independently
of the US, and Chinese investors may become less inclined to support America's
trade deficits and use their capital instead to fund internal growth. Other
foreigners will likely cut back on their US investment for fear of suffering
further losses from continued US dollar declines.
Eventually, to fund America's growing deficits, the Fed will have to accelerate
money creation to monetize part of America's debt and also hike interest rates
to try to lure foreign investment back. Rising interest rates will likely slow
the economy and hurt the stock, bond, and real estate markets. The magnitude
of America's trade deficits and indebtedness suggest that the US will eventually
wind up with double-digit interest rates and hyperinflation.
HOW GOLD COMPETES AGAINST OTHER INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES
I have already discussed in my "bad deflation" section how gold tends to be
a late bloomer in the bad inflation cycle, often trailing commodities, and
how it tends to benefit in a negative interest
rate environment. James Turk's commodity
chart shows us the explosive "generational" bull market in commodities that
took place in the stagflationary 1970's. This followed the sideways commodities
markets of the 1950's and 1960's. This raises an interesting question regarding
how explosively commodities might move in the decade ahead if they become the
focus of another generational event proportional to the commodities bear market
that lasted from 1980 to 2000.
Like gold, commodities in general can have a dual nature as investment vehicles
once investors perceive them as a store of value in an inflationary environment.
The 1970's era even showed how commodities could become the focus of an investment
mania.

[Source: "A Commodity
Bull Market" by James Turk]
Interestingly, commodities cycles have been getting
longer in the last eighty years, as suggested below by the Commodities
Cycles chart provided by the Di
Tomasso Group. This may be an indicator that we could be entering the
early phases of a long term commodities bull market.
| Commodity Market Cycles |
| Begins |
Ends |
Duration
in Years |
Change |
Type |
| 1921 |
1925 |
4 |
45% |
Bull |
| 1925 |
1932 |
7 |
-51% |
Bear |
| 1932 |
1937 |
5 |
70% |
Bull |
| 1937 |
1939 |
2 |
-25% |
Bear |
| 1939 |
1954 |
15 |
99% |
Bull |
| 1954 |
1970 |
16 |
-41% |
Bear |
| 1970 |
1981 |
11 |
106% |
Bull |
| 1981 |
1999 |
18 |
-68% |
Bear |
| 1999 |
?? |
?? |
?? |
Bull |
| |
| Duration of Bull Markets: |
35 years |
|
| Duration of Bear Markets: |
43 years |
|
| |
| Average Bull Market Return: |
80% |
|
| Average Bear Market Return: |
-46% |
|
| |
| [Source: Di
Tomasso Group] |
We might also note the "generational" 30 year Treasury Note chart below. Please
recall that the Fed began to hike interest rates between 1998 and 2000 to help
keep a lid on inflation and take some of the speculative air out of the stock
market mania. Jim Roger's article "For
Whom the Closing Bell Tolls" criticizes Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan for
not hiking margin rates and reducing monetary stimulus much sooner. My guess
is that somewhere around or prior to 1998 was probably the real bottom of the
generational trend in declining interest rates. The artificially low interest
rate environment we have been in since 2000 could simply reflect a postponement
of fundamental inflationary realities.

[source: "The
Silver and Gold Trainwreck" by James Puplava]
The chart below overlays the price action of gold on the exponential rise
in M3 and government spending. It provides another perspective on the rising
waters that may be filling a cracking dam to the brim. Eventually, long-term
interest rates, gold, and commodities may make a dramatic upward move together
as they did in the late 1970's.

[source: "The Once and
Future Money" by Bob Landis]
WHERE WILL IT ALL END?
James Sinclair said in a July
20, 2002 interview with James Puplava that he exited gold in 1980 near
its top at $850 following its long run in the stagflationary 1970's. He took
his cue when Fed Chairman Paul Volcker hiked short term interest rates to
16%. To Sinclair, this showed that the Fed was finally serious about stopping
inflation. This was after the prime rate had held over 20% for over a year.
This dramatic Fed tightening created a credible positive real interest rate
environment and an air of certainty about interest rate trends (stable to
down). All of this was bad for gold, and suggested a top.
ITS ALMOST LIKE THE BEREAVEMENT STAGES...
Today, even though the M3 growth charts look scary, the government, central
bank, national media, and public at large are still in denial. Let us call
this stage the Phase I denial stage. We still have at least two more phases
to go. Phase Two entails general acceptance of a serious inflation problem.
Phase Three entails taking decisive steps to stop the problem, as Fed Chairman
Volcker did in the early 1980's. Using the Sinclair method, one might simply
buy gold and silver stocks now and hold until America shows credible evidence
of achieving Phase III. This will probably be many years from now.
In his article "To
the Moon, Alice!" James Puplava wrote about how in the first phase of
a long term bull market, the smart money gets in. Then in the second phase
the institutional investors get in. Finally, in the third and last phase,
the little guy gets in. Puplava thinks we are in the tail end of phase I.
Mass media publications are often a contrarian indicator for when the little
guy is finally catching on. If Puplava is correct, one might still consider
accumulating gold and other precious metals stocks now and then wait until
someone like Pierre Lassonde, President of Newmont Mining, makes the cover
of Time magazine before inserting stop loss orders.
Link to Part III of Series
|