|
I have been very pleased with the progress of my legislation, HR 1207, which
calls for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve and removes many significant
barriers towards transparency of our monetary system. This bill now has nearly
170 cosponsors, with support from both Republicans and Democrats. Senator Bernie
Sanders has introduced a companion bill in the Senate S 604, which will hopefully
begin to gain momentum as well. I am very encouraged to see so many of my colleagues
in Congress stand with me for greater transparency in government.
Some have begun to push back against this bill, and I am very happy to address
their concerns.
The main argument seems to be that Congressional oversight over the Fed is
government interference in the free market. This argument shows a misunderstanding
of what a free market really is. Fundamentally, you cannot defend the Federal
Reserve and the free market at the same time. The Fed negates the very foundation
of a free market by artificially manipulating the price and supply of money
- the lifeblood of the economy. In a free market, interest rates, like the
price of any other consumer good, are decentralized and set by the market.
The only legitimate, Constitutional role of government in monetary policy is
to protect the integrity of the monetary unit and defend against counterfeiters.
Instead, Congress has abdicated this responsibility to a cabal of elite, quasi-governmental
banks who, instead of stabilizing the economy, have destabilized it. It took
less than two decades for the Federal Reserve to bring on the Great Depression
of the 1930's. It has also inflated away the value of our currency by
over 96 percent since its inception. It has invisibly stolen from the poor
and given to the rich through this controlled inflation, and now openly stolen
through recent bank bailouts. It has predictably exacerbated the very problems
it was meant to solve.
Detractors have also argued that the Fed must remain immune from the political
process, and that that more congressional oversight would distort their very
important decisions. On the contrary, the Federal Reserve is already heavily
entrenched in the political process, as the Fed chairman is a political appointee.
High level officials routinely make the rounds between positions at the Fed,
member banks, Treasury and back again, taking care of friends and each other
along the way.
As far as the foolishness of placing complex monetary policy decisions in
the hands of politicians - I couldn't agree more. No politician or central
banker, no matter how brilliant, is smart enough to know more than the market
itself. The failure of central economic planning has been witnessed over and
over. It is frankly beyond me why we ever agreed to try it again.
To understand how unwise it is to have the Federal Reserve, one must first
understand the magnitude of the privileges they have. They have been given
the power to create money, by the trillions, and to give it to their friends,
under any terms they wish, with little or no meaningful oversight or accountability.
Thus the loudest arguments against greater transparency are likely to come
from those friends, and understandably so.
However, it is the responsibility of every member of Congress to represent
the interests of the people that sent them to Washington and find out what
has been happening with our money. As the branch of government with the power
of the purse, we really have no other reasonable choice when the economy is
in the shape it is in.
|