|
The following article is excerpted from a brand-new eBook on gold and silver
published by Robert Prechter, founder and CEO of the technical analysis and
research firm Elliott Wave International. For the rest of this fascinating
40-page eBook, download
it for free here.
Have you ever traveled abroad and taken a look at the local currency and wondered
how the citizens of that country could take seriously what looks like "Monopoly
money?" I've got news for you: You're using the same stuff. Monopoly money
is the money over which some government has a monopoly. It is the currency
of the realm only because the state makes it illegal to use any other type.
Promissory notes issued by a state and declared the only legal tender are
always doomed to depreciate to worthlessness because of the natural incentives
and forces associated with governments. A state cannot resist a method of confiscating
assets, particularly one that is hidden from the view of most voters and subjects.
By extension, it is unreasonable to advocate a standard for such notes, which
is simply a state's promise that its currency will always be redeemable in
a specific amount of something valuable, such as gold. A gold standard of
this type is only as good as the political promises behind it, reducing its
value to no more than that of paper. It could be argued, in fact, that a state-sponsored
gold standard is far more dangerous than none at all, as it imbues citizens
with a false sense of security. Their long range plans are thus built upon
an unreliable promise that the monetary measuring unit will remain stable.
Later, when the government's "IOU-something specific" becomes, as Colonel
E.C. Harwood put it, "IOU nothing in particular," reliability disappears and
the arbitrary reigns. Although the populace tends to retain its confidence
in the currency for awhile thereafter, the ultimate result is chaos.
The only sound monetary system is a voluntary one. The free market always
chooses the best possible form, or forms, of money. To date, the market's choice
throughout the centuries, wherever a free market for money has existed, has
been and remains precious metal and currency redeemable in precious metal.
This preference will undoubtedly remain until a better form of money is discovered
and chosen. Until then, prices for goods and services should be denominated
not in state fictions such as dollars or yen or francs, but in specific weights
of today's preferred monetary metal, i.e., in grams of gold. Anyone might issue
promissory notes as currency, but the acceptance of such paper certificates
would then be an individual decision, and risks of loss through imprudence
or dishonesty would be borne by only a few individuals by their own conscious
choice after considering the risks. Critical to the understanding of the wisdom
of such a system is the knowledge that private issuers of paper against gold
have every long run incentive to provide a sound product, just as do producers
of any product. As a result, risks would be minimal, as the market would provide
its own policing. Thievery and imprudence will not disappear among men, but
at least such tendencies in a free market for money would not have the potential
to be institutionalized, as they are when a state controls the currency. From
a macroeconomic viewpoint, occasional losses resulting from dishonesty or imprudence
would be extremely limited in scope, as opposed to the nationwide disasters
that state controlled paper money has facilitated throughout history, which
have in turn had global repercussions. As Elliott Wave Principle put
it, "That paper is no substitute for gold as a store of value is probably another
of nature's laws."
That being said, it is also true, and crucial to wise investing, that markets
come in both "bull" and "bear" types. Being a "gold bug" at the wrong time
can be very costly in currency terms. For nearly three decades, gold and silver's
dollar price trends have confounded the precious metals enthusiasts, who for
the entire period have argued that soaring gold and silver prices were "just
around the corner" because the Fed's policies "guarantee runaway inflation." Yet
today, 29 years after the January 1980 peaks in these metals and despite consistent
inflation throughout this time, their combined dollar value (weighting each
metal equally) is still 40 percent less than it was then.
It is all well and good to despise fiat money, but it is hardly useful to
sit in gold and silver as if no other opportunities exist. In contrast to the
one-note approach, which has had an immense opportunity cost since 1980, competent
market analysis can help you make many timely and profitable financial decisions
in all markets, including gold and silver.
For more in-depth, historical analysis and long-term forecasts for precious
metals, download
Prechter's FREE 40-page eBook on Gold and Silver.
|