|
Well, which is the driving force, the U.S. $ plunge or the gold price rise?
Who cares as long as gold is on the rise, right? There still are a couple of
resistance levels for gold to overcome but they may not be all that serious.
GOLD
LONG TERM
Just a quick word about the U.S. $. It closed on Friday at 79.43 which was
a close below the December low close but not below the December intraday low.
So, it depends upon if one is looking at the intraday low or the closing low
to see if the $ has broken below the previous "low" for a double top confirmation
and a move to the 68.00 level as mentioned last week. Another down day for
the $ and both lows will probably be breached with the question unimportant,
but for today I would still like to see the close at below the previous intraday
low for confirmation.

The chart today is what I refer to as my very long term chart. It includes
a 52 week RSI and a 52 week simple moving average line. I wouldn't go into
any detail analysis of this chart (I think I had done that some time back)
suffice it to say that BOTH the RSI and the price/moving average are in sync
on the bullish side. For me to go bullish or bearish on the very long term
I like both of these indicators to be telling me the same story. The price
should be above a positive sloping moving average line and the RSI should be
inside its positive zone (above the 50% level). The reverse is true for a bear
market. During times when both are not in sync we have a neutral trend. It
could be a + neutral coming off a bull trend or a - neutral coming off a bear
trend.
Late last year both indicators were in sync, on the down side for a very long
term BEAR rating, the first bear since the bull took hold in 2001. However,
in late April both indicators had reversed back to the up side for a very long
term BULL rating. That's where the very long term stands, once more.
Going back to my normal long term indicators, everything is still looking
good. The price is above its positive sloping moving average line and the momentum
indicator is inside its positive zone above its positive trigger line. As for
the volume indicator, it continues to move upward above its positive trigger
line. The long term rating remains BULLISH.
INTERMEDIATE TERM
No surprises here, the intermediate term continues on its way to higher levels.
The price is above its positive moving average line and the momentum indicator
continues to push higher inside its positive zone. The indicator also continues
to move above its positive trigger line. The volume indicator continues positively
above its positive trigger line. On the intermediate term gold remains BULLISH.
SHORT TERM

I guess I went a little overboard with drawing trend lines today but what
the heck, each line tells a story. I'll leave it up to the reader to try and
decipher each story for themselves. Just remember that once you have a well
defined trend line its breaking is telling us something. Also, the momentum
trend line, when we have one, is most important and usually slightly ahead
of the price trend.
On the short term everything smells roses. The price and various indicators
are above their trend lines and positive moving average lines. The volume activity
is starting to perk up on the up side. The very short term moving average line
continues to trace higher levels above the short term moving average line.
The short term rating can only be BULLISH.
The immediate direction of least resistance is to the up side but caution
has already been noted. Both the short term momentum indicator and the aggressive
Stochastic Oscillator have entered their overbought zone. That is a warning
that a possible end on the up side may not be far ahead. It may only be a rest
or a short reaction but something can be expected to halt the latest upside
move. When? That is not yet eminent.
SILVER

Up, up and away. Quite a difference between the recent silver action and that
of gold. Gold has not yet exceeded its February high while silver has taken
off well above its similar high. Silver, however, still has a long way to go
to reach its previous 2008 high of $21.50. The volume indicator, however, is
well into new all time highs. Looking at my table of Non-Edibles Futures Indices
silver has the number 1 performance over the past long term (200 days) and
the number 2 performance in the short term (15 days). Only in the intermediate
term has it stumbled somewhat and let the other non-edibles take over. It is
only number 15 out of 26 non-edible futures in the intermediate term (50 days).
Oil is the number 1 performer on the short and intermediate term.
It should be obvious without any analysis that the silver rating is BULLISH for
all three time periods and that the immediate direction of least resistance
is to the up side. The only cautionary indication is the fact that both the
short term momentum and the aggressive Stochastic Oscillator are in their overbought
zone and may start to dampen further upside action until after silver has taken
a rest to consolidate gains.
PRECIOUS METAL STOCKS

As long time readers to these commentaries know, I use only simple technical
techniques in my weekly analysis. I do the same in my weekly service relative
to stocks. Now, I so often come across "investors" who claim that they find
the technical discipline very hard to follow and use. Most claim that it just
doesn't work. Well, in a matter of a few simple paragraphs I am going to show
you two different simple technical techniques that would have kept you from
losing your shirt over the past year or two and had you in cash getting back
in at near the bottom of a new move. To demonstrate I will use an actual stock
from my universe of 160 stocks. The name has been omitted as some web sites
that post these commentaries do not want commentators to name individual stocks.
The first simple technique is the short term moving average line crossing
the intermediate term moving average line. The cross over points are highlighted
on the chart as red arrows. I use the 15 day weighted (not exponential) moving
average (thin black line) for the short term and the 65 day weighted moving
average (blue line) for the intermediate term. You will get almost the same
performance by using the 10 day and 50 day simple moving averages. Note that
this simple technique is not perfect (perfection is only for losers). You would
have been whip-sawed in April and early May.
The second simple technique is a little more complicated but still simple.
Both the intermediate term moving average line and the intermediate term momentum
indicator should be in sync. For a buy the price should be above a positive
sloping moving average line and the momentum should be in the positive zone
(above the 50% level). For a sell the reverse is true. The price should be
below a negative sloping moving average line and the momentum indicator should
be in its negative zone. My preference for an intermediate term momentum indicator
is a 50 day RSI. Some might use the MACD. It is a little more aggressive but
still okay.
Let's see how this worked on this stock. For the first technique we had a
buy at $0.13 in early Dec, a sell at $0.41 in mid April and another buy at
$0.51 in early May. The net result was more than a 400% gain from the initial
buy. Not bad for 6 months of work, almost a living.
For the second technique we had an initial buy at $0.18 in late Dec and no
sell yet, for a similar gain of over 400%.
Looking back at this stock it was over a $1.70 stock back in 2006. It started
its decline then and had been moving lower until late last year as the chart
shows. The first technique is the more volatile technique. Looking back one
would have sold this stock at around the $1.60 level. There were three times
during the decline where one might have bought and then sold (getting whip-sawed)
based upon the very simple criteria. The loss from those transactions would
have been around 30% total. No matter the technique used, you should expect
that you will have losses from time to time. The experienced speculator limits
the amount of losses. Let's be conservative here and assume that for every
share you sold initially at $1.60 you had only $1.00 left to invest in late
2008. With that $1.00 you could have bought over 7 shares at the buy in point.
You are now holding 7 shares for every share you initially sold in 2006, worth
$7.00 at the recent price. The buy and hold "investor" would still be holding
that one share he initially had at the $1.70 price and now only worth $1.00.
This is a point so often missed by the masses who are wedded to this buy and
hold strategy. With the buy and sell strategy you are most likely to end up
with more shares costing a lot less per share. The strategy to buy extra shares
on the way down does the same thing BUT who knows if that stock will in fact
recover. Think General Motors here, the top "quality" a few years ago and
now a bankrupt. Buy extra shares on the way down did not work too well here.
Anyway, this is just to illustrate a couple of very simple technical techniques
that one can use to time his buys and sells without much work. Anyone not able
to understand these simple techniques should not be in the market. And again,
NO TECHNIQUE is perfect. Every technique WILL result
in a loss sooner or later and one must be prepared for such losses and keep
them small. I do have additional criteria that I use to try and limit the losses
but that would take too long to explain here.
Merv's Precious Metals Indices Table

Larger
Image
Well, I think I'll call it a week.
|