|
In my last column, I joked that with public spending out of control and the
piling on of the international bailout bill, economic collapse seems to be
the goal of Congress. It is getting harder to joke about such a thing however,
as the non-partisan General Accounting Office (GAO) has estimated that the
administration's health care plan would actually cost over a trillion dollars.
This reality check may have given us a temporary reprieve on this particular
disastrous policy, however an equally disastrous energy policy reared its ugly
head on Capitol Hill last week.
The Cap and Trade Bill HR 2454 was voted on last Friday. Proponents claim
this bill will help the environment, but what it really does is put another
nail in the economy's coffin. The idea is to establish a national level of
carbon dioxide emissions, and sell pollution permits to industry as the Catholic
Church used to sell indulgences to sinners. HR 2454 also gives federal bureaucrats
new power to regulate a wide variety of household appliances, such as light
bulbs and refrigerators, and further distorts the market by providing more
of your tax money to auto companies.
The administration has pointed to Spain as a shining example of this type
of progressive energy policy. Spain has been massively diverting capital from
the private sector into politically favored environmental projects for the
better part of a decade, and many in Washington apparently like what they see.
However, under no circumstances should anyone serious about economic recovery
emulate an economy that is now approaching 20 percent unemployment, where every
green job created, eliminated 2.2 real jobs and cost around $800,000 each!
The real inconvenient truth is that the cost of government regulations, taxes,
fees, red tape and bureaucracy is a considerable expense that has to be considered
when companies decide where to do business and how many people they can afford
to hire. Increasing governmental burden directly causes capital flight and
job losses, as Spain has learned. In this global economy its easy enough for
businesses to relocate to countries that are more politically friendly to economic
growth. If our government continues to kick the economy while its down, it
will be a long time before it gets back up. In fact, jobs are much more likely
to go overseas, compounding our problems.
And for what? Contrary to claims repeated over and over, there is no consensus
in the scientific community that global warming is getting worse or that it
is manmade. In fact over 30,000 scientists signed a petition recently directly
disputing the claims on which this policy is based. Legitimate environmental
claims should instead be directed towards the public sector. The government,
especially the military, is the most serious polluter in the country, and is
exempt from most EPA regulations. Meanwhile Washington bureaucrats have classified
the very air we exhale as a pollutant and have gone unchallenged in this incredible
assertion. The logical consequence is that there will come a time when we will
have to buy a government permit just to emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere
from our own lungs!
The events on Capitol Hill last week just demonstrate Washington's audacity
in manufacturing problems just so they can expand government power to solve
them.
|
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation
as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading
spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free
markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed
currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents
for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul
never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized
by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon,
Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
Copyright © 2006-2009 Dr. Ron Paul
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|