|
NEW YORK (KWR) -- North Korea remains one of the major flashpoints
in the world. It combines a hair-raising mixture of conventional and (potentially)
nuclear weapons, an opaque and threatening Stalinist dictatorship, and a ticklish
set of issues, encompassing imprisoned American journalists, the right to intervene
on the high seas, and a potential missile threat to the region as well as Alaska
and Hawaii. Looming over everything is the issue of political succession in
North Korea, a development that involves not just that regime, but the United
States, South Korea, Japan, Russia and China.
But we have been here before. In January 2009 a Council on Foreign Relations
report noted, North Korea spent most of the 1990s on "a prolonged deathwatch".
That decade did observe an acute economic crisis related to the collapse of
the Soviet Union in 1991-92, which removed North Korea's major financial backer,
the loss of its founding father, Kim Il-Sung (the Great Leader) in 1994 and
a devastating famine that resulted in probably a million or so deaths. Out
of this period, Kim Jung-il (son of the founding father and referred to as
the Dear Leader) emerged as North Korea's paramount leader. Last summer the
67-year old Kim had a stroke and the East Asian country sits at the crossroads
of another round of political succession. This is bad, but it could get worse.
The critical issues surrounding North Korea are as follows - a weak economy,
largely unable to feed its population, and political factions in the regime
jockeying for dominance as the elder Kim seeks to impose a family succession.
The best way to divert attention to a political succession struggle is to threaten
the neighborhood -- mainly Japan, South Korea and possibly the United States
via Alaska or Hawaii. If North Korea's enemies are busy dealing with threats
of armed incursions or missile attacks they will not be able to influence the
Byzantine politics in the Kim's inner court - or so it is hoped in Pyongyang.
The brashness vis-à-vis the outside world is manifest in a number of
ways. Beyond the testing of missiles, North Korea is holding two U.S. women
journalists after sentencing them to 12 years of "reform through labor" for
what state media called an illegal border crossing and an unspecified "grave
crime". In addition, the Kim regime has demanded that South Korean firms with
factories in Kaesong (a jointly-run industrial zone in the North) raise wages
for its 40,000 workers to $300 a month from $75. It also demanded an increase
in rent for the Seoul-funded estate to $500 million, compared to the current
$16 million for a 50-year contract.
North Korea in the past has violated past agreements, acted in a belligerent
fashion, and then come back to the bargaining table. This worked in 1994 and
again in recent years. This time around its past history of breaking agreements
is undermining North Korea's ability to push the international community into
another agreement. That was evident in the passage in the United Nations on
June 12th of sanctions against North Korea, which include high-seas searches
of North Korean ships for weapons of mass destruction (one of the country's
major exports). North Korea has stated that it will regard any such intervention
as a declaration of war and act accordingly. As the official line reads: "If
the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will...wipe
out the aggressors on the globe once and for all."
While the high-sea searches will certainly hurt North Korea and raise tensions
further, the most effective measures are those that target the lifestyle of
North Korean leaders. That means financial sanctions that seek to end all banking
transactions related to Pyongyang's weapons trade as well as halting grants
and loans. As a New York Times op-ed noted: "This would effectively freeze
many of Pyongyang's overseas bank accounts, cutting off the funds that North
Korean leader Kim Jong-il has used to secure the cognac, Swiss watches and
other luxury goods needed to buy the loyalty of his country's elites."
What complicates matters is that very little is known of the factional politics
at play inside North Korea. Our guess is that Dear Leader Kim is seeking to
impose his third son as the next leader. His first son, Kim Jong Nam, appears
disqualified as he was born out of wedlock and arrested in Tokyo in 2001 with
a false passport on his way to Disneyland. He also has a reputation as a playboy,
often observed in Macau. Son number two appears to have problems from unsubstantiated
rumors over his health and possible homosexuality. This has left the third
son, Jong-un, as the heir apparent by the elimination of his siblings. He is
also 26 years of age and has been described as "short, a bit overweight and
aggressive". Apparently the Dear Leader has favored number three, indicating
that he is the most like himself.
In late June 2009, it was reported in the South Korean press that the Dear
Leader in March ordered senior officials at the State Security Department to "uphold" Kim
Jung-un's position as head of the secret police. In this role, the younger
Kim would have presided over the treatment of the two American journalists
and their trail. It is noteworthy that the "rise" to power of Kim Jung-un such
that it is comes as the head of the state security apparatus, which is central
to maintaining the regime's control over the nation of 24 million people. To
help bolster Kim Jung-un's acceptance among the guardians of the dynasty, five
luxury cars were given to top security officials, each vehicle allegedly worth
some $80,000.
Yet, political succession from Kim Jong-il to Kim Jong-un may not be a smooth
process. The Council on Foreign Relations noted that all three sons are "widely
considered deficient or compromised in some way." This leaves other political
players, especially those senior figures in the military, with considerable
influence. Power also appears to be concentrated into the hands of Kim Jong-Il's
brother-in-law, Chang Sung Taek. Consequently we are left with a government
in North Korea that has decided that it wants to be a nuclear power or at least
is posturing like one and is also in the process of reducing foreign influence
during a period of political succession.
Despite Washington's global power status, North Korea is a game in which Beijing
has far more clout - and national interests at stake. With greater pressure
being exerted on Pyongyang due to the UN sanction, its economic and political
dependence on Beijing will increase considerably. Beijing will most likely
seek to keep the regime alive; it might use its influence to move the Pyongyang
regime away from its dynastic mode to something closer to a modern socialist-soft
authoritarian state under civilian leadership, much like China. That would
be relatively constructive move, considering where matters are currently.
The path to greater tensions in North Asia clearly exists. The U.N. sanctions
provide the context for the United States and other countries to reduce North
Korea's ability to generate exports and maintain the superior lifestyle of
the country's elite. At the same time, this will add pressure on an already
weak economy, threaten to push the country toward renewed food problems, and
leave the military the only force capable of maintaining order. Under such
developments a regime collapse cannot be ruled out, though the Kim dynasty
has defied expectations thus far. This leaves the short-term defined by higher
political tensions both within North Korea and North Asia, a questionable lifespan
for the Kim dynasty over the medium term, and increasing chances that major
changes are likely in Asia's geo-political make-up, with long-term implications
for Korea, China, the United States, Korea and Japan. Much depends on how cautious
Washington proceeds and what role Beijing wants to play. The deathwatch remains
prolonged.
|
Dr. Scott B. MacDonald,
KWR International, Inc.
Scott MacDonald is a Senior Consultant at KWR International.
To obtain your free subscription to the KWR International Advisor, please
click here to register for the KWR Advisor mailing list. Please forward
all feedback, comments and submission and reproduction requests to: KWR.Advisor@kwrintl.com.
The views expressed within do not necessarily relect those
of KWR International, Inc.
While the information and opinions contained within have
been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, KWR does not represent
that it is accurate or complete and it should be relied on as such. Accordingly,
nothing in this article shall be construed as offering a guarantee of the accuracy
or completeness of the information contained herein, or as an offer or solicitation
with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. All opinions and estimates
are subject to change without notice. KWR staff, consultants, authors and contributors
to the KWR International Advisor, Special Reports, Market Viewpoints, Guest
Opinions, Alerts and all other articles may at any time have a long or short
position in any security or option mentioned.
To obtain your free subscription to the KWR International
Advisor or to register for these special alerts, please
click here to register for the KWR International mailing list.
Copyright © 2004-2009 KWR International,
Inc.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|