|
If one were to parse the bullshit that the government has allowed the banks
to proffer in the name of earngings, one would find the banks will probably
be flailing this quarter from bad loans and mortgages. Beware of the FASB authorized
accounting games and peer beneath the hood. I have included a portion of the professional
level Wells Fargo analysis (click this link to subscribe) to help drive
my point home, but before you peruse it as a non-subscriber, be sure to remember
how this research subject twisted and manipulted their numbers to produce a
bank profit out of a bank loss - Tricky
Dick Bank Reporting Schemes - What record earnings are you referring to? then
take a look at the hard data released by the FDIC and the NY Fed: Revised
SCAP Assumptions Public Open Source Version 1.1 2009-05-18 15:15:47 1.21 Mb)
as well as an
explanation as to how I tabuluated it.
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo acquired home equity loans from Wachovia, which carries the highest
default risk as its portfolio largely comprises second lien mortgages. The
value of the home equity portfolio is US$128.9 billion.
| Home equity portfolio |
US$ mn |
| Core portfolio |
| California |
31,784 |
| Florida |
12,067 |
| New Jersey |
8,086 |
| Virginia |
5,653 |
| Pennsylvania |
5,129 |
| Other |
56,342 |
| Total core portfolio |
119,061 |
| Liquidating Portfolio |
| California |
3,835 |
| Florida |
492 |
| Arizona |
233 |
| Texas |
179 |
| Minnesota |
122 |
| Other |
5,001 |
| Total liquidating portfolio |
9,862 |
| Total core and liquidating portfolios |
128,923 |
The value of Wells Fargo's pick-a-pay portfolio (home loans) is US$93.2 billion
of which US$39.7 billion or 42.6% is impaired loans. The principal balance
of the impaired loans is US$61.6 billion. This loan has the highest probability
of risk and could result in complete writedown. Currently, the LTV in majority
of the states is above 100%, with California and Arizona having the highest
- 161% and 152%, respectively. Despite writing down US$21.9 billion, the carrying
value at these two states hovered around 100%, implying high risk.
| Pick-a-pay-portfolio |
Impaired loans |
| |
Unpaid principal
balance |
Current LTV % |
Carrying value |
Carrying value to
current value |
| California |
42,216 |
152.0% |
26,907 |
98.0% |
| Florida |
6,260 |
129.0% |
3,779 |
79.0% |
| New Jersey |
1,750 |
101.0% |
1,271 |
74.0% |
| Texas |
475 |
76.0% |
336 |
54.0% |
| Arizona |
1,642 |
161.0% |
987 |
99.0% |
| Other states |
9,306 |
110.0% |
6,397 |
77.0% |
| Total |
61,649 |
|
39,677 |
|
Methodology to compute loan loss rate: Real estate 1−4 family junior
lien mortgage
Real estate 1−4 family junior lien mortgage comprises home equity line
of credit (HELOC) and second/junior lien mortgage. Home equity carries a very
high risk of default due to high LTV and being second lien mortgage. We segregated
the loans into owner occupied and non-owner occupied based on the state-wise
proportion published by FDIC. Thereafter, applying the respective default rate
of each category we arrived at the weighted average default rate.
To determine net charge-offs, we have considered the recovery rate based on
historical recovery rates applied in conjunction with the current LTV. The
table below gives the recovery rates used to determine net charge-offs.
| |
Current LTV |
Recovery rate |
Basis |
| Greater than |
120% |
12.0% |
(recovery rates during 1990-1991, lowest since 1976) |
| Greater than |
110% |
16.7% |
|
| Greater than |
100% |
21.4% |
(average recovery rate since 1976) |
| Greater than |
90% |
28.2% |
|
| Less than |
<90% |
35.0% |
(highest recovery rate since 1976) |
Source: FDIC and Boombustblog.com Analysis
We estimated the current LTV for home equity loans based on the housing price
decline calculated using the Case-Shiller Index of each state and LTV at origination
to determine the current LTV. Impaired loans have a two-year loss rate of 67.5%,
while other loans have a loss rate of 56.4%. We have assumed impaired loans
to have a 0% recovery rate in each of the states. The non-impaired home
equity loans would have a loss rate of 56.4% for 2009 and 2010, while the Federal
Reserve's estimated loss rate is 21-28% for the same period.
Real estate 1−4 family
junior lien mortgage |
High Risk Subprime
ARM Loans (Low FICO and high LTV) |
| |
Current LTV |
Owner
Occupied |
Non-Owner
Occupied |
Default rate |
Recovery
Rate |
Loss Rate |
| Impaired Loans |
65.0% |
95.0% |
|
| California |
128% |
93.7% |
6.3% |
66.9% |
0% |
66.9% |
| Florida |
124% |
88.7% |
11.3% |
68.4% |
0% |
68.4% |
| New Jersey |
108% |
91.5% |
8.5% |
67.6% |
0% |
67.6% |
| Arizona |
146% |
91.9% |
8.1% |
67.4% |
0% |
67.4% |
| Other |
112% |
91.0% |
9.0% |
67.7% |
0% |
67.7% |
| Total Impaired Loans |
67.5% |
| All other loans: |
| California |
128% |
93.7% |
6.3% |
66.9% |
12% |
58.9% |
| Florida |
124% |
88.7% |
11.3% |
68.4% |
12% |
60.2% |
| New Jersey |
108% |
91.5% |
8.5% |
67.6% |
21% |
53.1% |
| Virginia |
111% |
91.1% |
8.9% |
67.7% |
17% |
56.4% |
| New York |
90% |
92.0% |
8.0% |
67.4% |
28% |
48.4% |
| Pennsylvania |
111% |
90.0% |
10.0% |
68.0% |
17% |
56.6% |
| North Carolina |
86% |
88.3% |
11.7% |
68.5% |
35% |
44.5% |
| Texas |
89% |
91.6% |
8.4% |
67.5% |
35% |
43.9% |
| Georgia |
105% |
88.5% |
11.5% |
68.5% |
21% |
53.8% |
| Arizona |
146% |
91.9% |
8.1% |
67.4% |
12% |
59.3% |
| Other |
112% |
91.0% |
9.0% |
67.7% |
17% |
56.4% |
| Home equity portfolio |
56.4% |
As a reminder...
The
two tailed banking crisis and the raw data with the storie behind it;
America,
You have been outright lied to! Bamboozled! Swindled! Hoodwinked! The Worst
Case Scenario
Reggie
Middleton Slashes Financial Jargon with Weapons of the TRUTH! Here are the
Stress Tests
Warning: "What
you don't report in your balance sheet can screw the average investor"!
Is
the Fed following BoomBustBlog? Let's hope so!
Quick
opinion on bank stress tests
For those who want the hard data that I used to come up wit; h the findings
below, as well as to run their own calculations, I welcome you to the open
source model: The
Truth About the Banks Has Been Released: the open source spreadhseet edition as
well as the Welcome
to the Big Bank Bamboozle! and The
banking backdrop for 2009.
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who
am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2010 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2010
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|