|

From last weekend's NFTRH41:
"Anecdotally, I see a gold sector that has quieted down considerably.
That is good. Things now seem to be in the realm of chartists micromanaging
the decline, looking for trend lines and projecting downside targets, support,
etc. With each passing week, we hear less and less about the vaunted Inverted
Head & Shoulders pattern that was imagined in gold in response to immense
inflationary policy by our friends in government. These are all bullish
proceedings, but you must have patience and keep in mind that, as galling
as it will feel to inflation believers, there is downside potential prior
to the real bullish price objectives, the next of which is 1300."
I spoke too soon. The pattern is gaining some attention this week. But this
time, the attention includes some of the negating kind, for the reasons I illustrated
two months ago; drum roll please... no prior downtrend. This from
an NFTRH subscriber:
"Hi Gary: For the longest time, you were the only person that I saw who
was claiming that gold's weekly intermediate term chart was NOT an inverse
H & S. And believe me, I read tons of articles with corresponding TA
calling the pattern an inverse H & S, and this has been going on for
months. I never saw anyone else who was thinking along your lines in that
regard until now. Don't know if you saw it but Merv Burak, a certified
market technician (CMT) wrote an article yesterday and the particular points
he made were as follows:
'As for the intermediate term pattern, the left and right shoulders can
be seen on the right side of the chart with the reverse head in the middle.
Unfortunately, I DO NOT subscribe to these being reverse head and shoulder
patterns. They are more legitimately potential double top patterns which
I had talked about previously.
Head and shoulder patterns are trend reversal patterns and therefore
for a reverse head and shoulder to be present (suggesting an upside break)
you would have had to have had a bear market move leading into the pattern.
For a normal head and shoulder the lead in trend would have been a bull market
trend. In neither of these cases do we have a bear market leading into the
formation of the pattern and therefore we DO NOT have a reverse head
and shoulder pattern.'
The full article can be found here.
Regards, Bruce"
I have given up trying to figure out why the gold price is so intensively
micromanaged by people who would claim it is the only real money on earth.
If it is real money, then it is not just another FOREX play to be paired off
with other plays and charted into oblivion. As I have always written, and as
was taught to me by a real gold guru, 'gold is not about price... gold is about
value.'
Obviously Mr. Burak is looking at it from a technical perspective and is telling
it like he sees it. I have not read his material in several years but from
what I recall, he is not afraid to put forth his unbiased technical view, whether
right or wrong. That is what TA is all about. It must stand separate from fundamental
views. Insofar as one needs to manage the price of gold for trading and working
a world full of 'plays' out there, then this is the way to go about it. With
deeply held beliefs firmly in check while TA and sentiment analysis guide the
way.
Well, it has been a while so I guess I will do a little micromanagement of
the gold price myself. Actually, nothing has changed whatsoever, but this can
serve as a review. Here we see the weekly chart of gold. Months ago I published
this post negating the
inverted H&S but showing another bullish potential, an ascending triangle
with its ultimately bullish objective of 1300. This level has been our target
in NFTRH all along, but... and in this case the 'but' is crucial to players
and casino patrons far and wide... the lower uptrend line needs another successful
bump for the pattern to be actualized. Failing that, I have noted a support
level at or just below 700 that should be bought like mad by anyone who needs
exposure but loves a bargain. Then again, when you are talking about value
in a monetary world gone mad, I would think that the need for exposure surmounts
the desire to get a steal.
A somewhat uneven symmetrical triangle has been added to the mix, but there
is really no functional difference between the two patterns. They both need
a test of the lower line and they both ultimately target the 1300 area. Bullish
objectives could still be many months out. The weekly MACD is not pretty and
implies room to drop to the lower uptrend line.
Now, having had the 'gold is not about price, gold is about value' mantra
hammered home to me several years ago when I was but a fledgling gold market
player, I have truly found this simple concept invaluable in managing my tack
with regard to the various market plays. That is because even though gold may
(emphasis on may because there will likely come a day when the metal surprises
everybody and tells we TA geeks to go jump in lake) decline in the near term,
its ratios to the various assets of hope and positive correlation are what
count (or should count) for gold stock traders and for macro market forecasters.
I am bullish on gold. I am certainly not telling readers to be bearish on
it. I am simply asking you to be aware of the potentials for its price, both
to the upside and the downside and of the timeframes that are likely. It is
a good bet that when gold finally does launch for real, it will do so without
some of its most would-be ardent believers aboard. It will launch amid fear
and agony. That's the way this market works.
|