|
This is a snippet from a recent issue of the Gold Forecaster with Subscriber-only
parts excluded.
For many years, accusations that JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America
and Goldman Sachs have wide open and huge, exposed short positions against
gold and silver, have been made by groups like GATA and others. In the United
States these four banks control over 90% of the derivatives market. They
too will be subject to "substantial supervision and regulations," including
conservative capital requirements and strong business conduct standards.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is set to propose giving securities
and futures regulators authority to police the over-the-counter derivatives
market. Discussions on these regulations begin next week.
Oil market regulation is the first target so as to keep oil prices free from
speculatively higher prices. Other markets, including Gold & Silver, are
being targeted for regulation at the same time. The Secretary is moving to
address these accusations and ensure that the markets involved are managed
in an orderly, regulated manner. On the surface it appears that these regulations
will simply affect the markets from the day of the enforcement of the regulations
and thereafter, but it is more likely that actions to clean up their acts will
start much earlier , if there has been market manipulation?
Mr.
Geithner stated, "Our plan will help prevent market manipulation, fraud
and other abuses by providing full information to regulators about activity
in the OTC derivative markets." The Securities and Exchange Commission, which
oversees securities, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which supervises
futures markets, would have authority to impose recordkeeping and reporting
requirements on the derivatives. This plan is geared toward removing counterparty
risks by requiring greater use of central counterparties and imposing stricter
capital standards on participants. If Mr. Geithner's staff succeeds in bringing
true transparency to these markets, either the charges of manipulation will
be dropped or the manipulation will be halted!
Are the Banks 'short'?
The sheer size of the derivatives market is enormous, but this is not too
much of a concern in itself, provided the great majority of positions match
each other or stock is held against the 'open' positions.
In other words, for example, where someone sells a futures contract, there
will be someone who buys it. This would 'match' the position and remove risk
from the overall exchange position. However, where there were sales of the
commodity that were not 'matched' [where there is none of the product to deliver
into the contract] one would be left with an exposed position with no real
counterparty. This is called going 'short'. Going 'long' is the other way,
but also involves a seller. The buyer must buy from some counterparty that
should be able to supply the item on the date of maturity of the contract.
If he can't then the position of the overall exchange is 'short' and can't
deliver stock to the buyer. Once it has stock, the seller must go into the
market to buy the item so he can deliver to the buyer thereby 'close' the position.
The Exchange on which the transaction is dealt is responsible for ensuring
that all contracted items can be delivered on the date of maturity of the contract.
The exchange itself should hold the physical amount of the item in its own
warehouse that needs to be delivered to the buyers whose position is not 'matched'.
This ensures an orderly market.
The accusations that have attended the four banks are that they cannot deliver
the physical item because they are heavily 'short' to the extent that prices
are heavily manipulated. The closing and subsequent opening again, of these
positions, on due date, enables the 'short' position to be perpetuated for
as long as the bank wants to, despite the potential losses or gains sitting
in the contract over time. Provided the new regulations are efficient such
exposed positions will be highlighted, bringing the wrath of the government
and the public on these institutions once more.
If they are what will they do?
Imagine yourself holding huge short positions that are carrying massive losses,
what would you do? The charges made by bodies like GATA are made by intelligent
convinced men who tell us they have indisputable proof of long-term manipulation
of the gold and silver markets. If they are correct, what will happen?
Subscribers only
If they are what will the CFTC do?
- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission will hold public hearings from
next week and in August to consider position limits in oil and gas markets.
But that is not all.
- A member of that Commission Mr. Chilton said he daily hears concerns about
large positions being held in metals, particularly in silver and gold. Since
last September, the CFTC's enforcement division has joined other federal
and international regulators in an investigation into potential manipulation
and concentration of positions in the silver market.
- Chilton said he is unsure whether his fellow commissioners would support
position limits on metals, but is hopeful the idea will gain momentum during
the hearings on oil and gas.
The next few months will see, we hope, GATA's work bear fruit in the correcting
of market manipulation. We would hope that new regulations do just what Mr.
Geithner promised they would do, to resolve current manipulation and to prevent
future market manipulation. So what will happen to the gold market if the banks..........
Subscribers only
Gold Forecaster regularly covers all fundamental and
Technical aspects of the gold price in the weekly newsletter. To subscribe,
please visit www.GoldForecaster.com.
|